Lufthansa Ending Flights To San Jose, California

Over the past few years we’ve seen airlines launch longhaul flights to secondary markets. This has been possible thanks to fuel efficient, low capacity, long haul aircraft, and thanks to generally low oil prices.

With these new routes comes some trial and error. I commend airlines for trying new routes, but I guess sometimes the math doesn’t work out the way they were expecting.

San Jose Airport in California is one that has benefited from longhaul expansion, as the airport now has both transatlantic and transpacific flights. Unfortunately the airport lost one longhaul route last month, and will lose another one this month.

Lufthansa will be discontinuing their flight between Frankfurt and San Jose as of October 27, 2018. This flight has an interesting history:

  • Lufthansa began flying between Frankfurt and San Jose 5x weekly as of April 29, 2016
  • While the route was initially operated year-round, they suspended the flight between October 2017 and March 2018, though they claimed that this was “purely for operational reasons due to a shortage that [they] have in staffing crews in [their] intercontinental operations”
  • In March 2018, Lufthansa resumed operations, and made a point of saying that the route would return year-round

Now Lufthansa has quietly removed this flight from the schedule. Not only has it been removed from the schedule for winter, but it’s not showing for next summer either, so it looks like it’s being removed permanently.

This flight has been operated by a Cityline Airbus A340-300, featuring just 18 business class seats. So while you’d think San Jose would be a business market, the route had a configuration more designed for leisure destinations.

Lufthansa continues to operate flights to Los Angeles, San Francisco, and as of recently, San Diego. My guess is that there was just too much overlap between the Bay Area airports, and they just couldn’t make both San Jose and San Francisco work.

Interestingly Air China also launched flights between San Jose and Shanghai in 2016, though the airline canceled their flights as of a couple of weeks ago.

At this point San Jose’s intercontinental service includes an ANA flight to Tokyo Narita, a British Airways flight to London Heathrow, and a Hainan flight to Beijing.

British Airways 787 at San Jose Airport

Are you surprised to see Lufthansa cut their San Jose to Frankfurt flight?

Conversations (16)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

NL Guest

Dang this is disappointing, if you ask me. As a San Jose native, this was the best route from Europe back to the Bay Area

0
‼ 0
Omar Guest

One of the issues with ex-SJC flights is a matter of education. Many people do not know they exist including employees at the big tech companies based near there. Searching SFO on most search engines will not also include SJC (or OAK for that matter).

0
‼ 0
Stuart Diamond

I agree with a lot of the sentiments here. SJC is perhaps good for a quick flight to LAX or SAN so as to avoid SFO parking, long rental return, etc. But for International flights SFO is almost as close when thinking Palo Alto and environs. They are just not that far apart. And for International flights I will always choose SFO for better lounges (the BA lounge in SJC is pitiful), duty fee, amenities and, most important, numerous alternate options in case of flight delays or cancellations. An example is that If BA has a significant delay in SJC or an outright cancellation you are going to get shuffled up to SFO and probably not make it out until the next night. I know there has been a lot of talk about Ontario in SoCal recently and I actually see that as a much more viable target for secondary International flights (especially to Asia) over LAX. It can take two hours to get to LAX from the inland empire during high traffic times and it serves a massive population center. As well it is great for International travelers to access Palm Springs and the high desert cities.

0
‼ 0
TJ Guest

That is really sad. There are many people living in the southbay and I agree SJC is a much easier airport to navigate. I noticed low load factors on that flight as well and I think it has to do with lack of advertising. Most people simply didn't know and automatically search for a flight to SFO. Even I, knowing about that flight had sometimes forgotten about this routing and then realized, oh wait, I should really fly into SJC. By default you search for SFO. This has nothing to do with the tech centers supposedly moving north, that's completely BS. The tech center remain for the most part around Mountain View/Sunnyvale/Palo Alto.

0
‼ 0
mike Guest

Goodbye to the arrival plus 15 minutes total for immigration and baggage claim which is at least 45 minutes at SFO with the A380 and trying to find bags between carousel 5 and 6.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published