France Bans Short Domestic Flights, But…

France has just formally banned short domestic flights that can be covered by train in a reasonable amount of time. While French lawmakers initially voted to ban these flights back in April 2021, it took over two years to actually implement this new law. While this no doubt sounds drastic, the practical implications are fairly limited.

France’s ban on domestic flights

Under a government decree published on May 23, 2023, France has banned domestic flights for routes that can be covered by train in under 2hr30min. The law states that train services on these routes must be frequent and well timed enough to meet the needs of travelers who would otherwise use airplanes. The idea is that travelers need to be able to do a same day trip while spending eight hours at the destination.

France’s National Assembly initially voted on this over two years ago. However, some airlines asked the European Commission to look into the legality of this law, which is why the implementation was delayed.

Interestingly this had initially been voted on shortly after it was announced that the French government would more than double its stake in Air France-KLM, which came with some significant provisions. This new rule is part of an overall effort by France to reduce carbon emissions by 40% by 2030, bringing them back down to 1990 levels.

As France’s Industry Minister, Agnes Pannier-Runacher, described this update at the time:

“We know that aviation is a contributor of carbon dioxide and that because of climate change we must reduce emissions. Equally, we must support our companies and not let them fall by the wayside.”

France had been considering all kinds of measures to reduce emissions from aviation. For example, in September 2020 I wrote about how the country was considering adding the world’s highest aviation eco-tax, which could be 400 EUR one-way for long haul business class flights. Furthermore, the country has been looking to restrict private jet flights.

Other ideas under consideration included banning flights where there are train connections of less than four hours, and even banning the construction of new airports and expansion of existing airports.

France was considering the world’s highest aviation eco-tax

How many routes are impacted by this?

This new measure of banning short haul domestic flights might sound drastic, but how many flight routes are actually impacted by this new rule? Of the 108 pre-coronavirus domestic routes in France, this impacts… five routes. Yep, just five.

This includes the following (flights from Paris Charles de Gaulle aren’t impacted):

  • Paris Orly to Bordeaux
  • Paris Orly to Lyon
  • Paris Orly to Nantes
  • Paris Orly to Rennes
  • Lyon to Marseille
Only five routes are now banned

So this bans roughly ~4.6% of domestic flight routes. Admittedly these are probably some of the more high frequency routes, so it probably represents more than 4.6% of total domestic capacity, but still. I’d hardly call this revolutionary, and I doubt this will materially impact Air France’s financial performance.

Why are flights from Paris Charles de Gaulle not impacted? It’s because the law is intended to target those flying exclusively within the country, so it doesn’t impact those connecting off long haul flights.

In the case of Paris Charles de Gaulle, these routes can continue to exist, to serve passengers who are connecting from other markets (though local passengers can book them as well). I haven’t been able to compare schedules, but I can’t help but wonder if frequencies were simply increased out of Charles de Gaulle to make up for cuts out of Orly…

It’s primarily routes out of Paris Orly that are impacted

Bottom line

As of May 2023, France has banned domestic flights in markets that can be covered by trains in under 2hr30min. This is part of a larger plan to reduce emissions in the country, and initially came in conjunction with the government increasing its stake in Air France-KLM last year.

This new law impacts just five of the 100+ domestic routes in France, so the implications aren’t that major. At least it won’t have nearly as bad of an impact on the French aviation industry as the introduction of the world’s highest aviation tax, for example.

What do you make of France banning short haul domestic flights?

Conversations (46)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Likhon Guest

Governments have too much power. This should be totally illegal, doesn't make any sense whatsoever. Europe, North America going 100 percent carbon neutral wouldn't change a thing as far as what they are saying they want to accomplish. This is absurd and going backwards. If I want to fly, I want to fly and I should have the option. These rich countries must come out of their little 'Hollier than thou' woke bubble and recognize how most people (India, China, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Brazil, countries in Africa) live in this world. For billions of people, the most important thing in their lives is the next meal, education, healthcare, sanitation. We currently have numerous more pressing needs than this 'carbon neutral' BS. Focus on the education, healthcare. France still occupies Ivory Coast, Dahomey (currently Benin), French Sudan (currently Mali), Guinea, Mauritania, Niger, Senegal and they are lecturing people about weather. Disgusting!!!

0
‼ 0
Andy Diamond

I think its really just a symbolic measure. Also AF operates some of their long-hauls out of ORY (in particular to their colonies). Also CDG has a good railway station, while ORY hasn't. On the other hand, the TGV is really competitive within France. I would certainly use it, if I have no connection. It's really as quick as the plane if you consider a city center to city center connection.

0
‼ 0
Gary Guest

"Why are flights from Paris Charles de Gaulle not impacted? It’s because the law is intended to target those flying exclusively within the country, so it doesn’t impact those connecting off long haul flights." That is strange because La Compagnie and French Bee, which do less expensive long-haul, fly from Orly. My point is "who profits from the crime"? It is not environment as much as it is Air France, Delta and American, which fly transatlantic from CDG.

0
‼ 0
David Guest

And as a result of this, what will happen with the climate? Answer is...NOTHING! Just a bunch of people being inconvenienced for some feel good gimmick and power being taken away from citizens, given to power hungry politicians.

0
‼ 0
iamhere Guest

That's exactly why it does not make sense. It can operate as a connection from CDG for example and it's not saving much if they will increase train frequency. I guess EU high speed trains are not fuel effecient.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published