Etihad Reduces San Francisco And Boosts Dallas

While Etihad’s presence in the US has been steadily growing over the past few years, the airline just announced a couple of US service adjustments that show some interesting trends. Specifically, Etihad will be:

  • Reducing their Abu Dhabi to San Francisco flight from daily to 3x weekly as of February 1, 2017
  • Increasing their Abu Dhabi to Dallas flight from 3x weekly to daily as of February 1, 2017

auh-us

Logically you’d think there would be more local demand for Etihad’s flight out of San Francisco than their flight out of Dallas. Both routes are being operated by fairly low capacity Boeing 777-200LR aircraft, featuring 225 seats (including eight first class seats and 40 business class seats).

Etihad-First-Class-777-02
Etihad’s 777 first class

So, what could be causing this change?

Is Air India driving Etihad out of San Francisco?

Many of the passengers the Gulf carriers transport out of the US are connecting to India. It’s a huge market, and they’ve had a pretty captive audience for a while. As of last December Air India launched flights between Delhi and San Francisco, which is their first flight to the US west coast.

Apparently the route has been doing very well, as this flight will soon be operating daily.

Etihad doesn’t have much in the way of connecting traffic in San Francisco, given that their primary US partner is American. Given that they were relying largely on traffic originating in San Francisco, I assume they’ve been losing quite a bit of the Bay Area to India market to Air India.

air-india-777

Is Etihad’s partnership with American a success?

Dallas arguably has too much capacity from the Gulf carriers (at least to meet local demand), as Emirates, Etihad, and Qatar all operate flights to Dallas out of their respective hubs. However, American partners with both Etihad and Qatar, and presumably they provide a good amount of feed onto the airlines’ flights out of Dallas.

As of the middle of last year, American even improved mileage earning for travel on Etihad.

I would speculate that capacity on this route more than doubling isn’t because the demand in Dallas is there, but rather because this route will allow more opportunities for connecting passengers. For as much as the US carriers rag on the Gulf carriers, they still seem to do quite well working together.

Etihad-777

Bottom line

It’s interesting to see Etihad reallocate capacity in the US. I imagine Air India’s nonstop flight between San Francisco and Delhi has cut into Etihad’s load factors, while the growth out of Dallas is probably due to their partnership with American.

Are you surprised to see Etihad decrease San Francisco service and increase Dallas service?

Conversations (25)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Diana New Member

Thanks for this update. Just moved my award ticket to DFW which had a much better connection time to my home base. I wouldn't have known this if you hadn't posted this info. Thanks a bunch!

0
‼ 0
Desi Guest

@John UA not going to cooperate with AI because LH wouldn't like it. So UA is shackled to EU JV. Also UA unions won't allow any joint venture with airlines with low employee cost. At some point AI start looking for other partners like B6, AS and SW(assuming new contract permits) AI should upgrade cabin interiors and IFE system (or) content. Miserable connections in Delhi is a myth spun by travel agents and bloggers. Delhi immigration and customs are better than most advanced countries. AI working diligently to make connections smooth.

0
‼ 0
John Member

Statistics: Top 10 Source Markets for Etihad's AUH - SFO flights (No. of passengers) between Sep 2015 and Aug 2016 1) Delhi, India = 11,813 2) Mumbai, India = 9,782 3) Hyderabad, India = 8,791 4) Bangalore, India = 8,508 5) Chennai, India = 5,712 6) Abu Dhabi, UAE = 3,757 7) Ahmedabad, India = 3,462 8) Tehran, Iran = 2,375 9) Lahore, Pakistan = 2,118 10) Kochi, India = 1,632 So just counting the top 10 markets, India's share is around 86% (49,700 passengers) whereas Abu Dhabi, Lahore and Tehran contribute approx. 6%, 4.2% and 3.8% respectively. Clearly, any competition to Etihad will directly hurt its largest market base for San Francisco. And it probably wouldn't be wrong to generalize this assumption for most of its and other Gulf carrier's American markets. Therefore, as I said before, direct flights between US and India can drive out Gulf and European competition from India. (source: www.routesonline.com)

0
‼ 0
Mark Member

@Aaron I'm from LA but live abroad now, so travel many times a year between Europe and TBIT. It's incredible seeing the other passengers in the arrivals hall. I've seen some pretty strange luggage coming through (boxes and boxes of stuff coming off Asian flights). I'm just an aviation geek, so have a limited knowledge on how certain things actually work. Fx, it's public knowledge how much capacity there is on routes, but airlines do not have to report the actual load factors and statistics on the routes (right?). I think their should be a post on how to read the wikipedia statistics on U.S. airports, because it looks like they're coming from a .gov and the reports are based on building queries. Looking at LAX, it just doesn't seem even close to correct, when LAX-PVG has half the amount of passengers as INC when they both have 5 flights a day (I know INC throws in the whale almost exclusively, but still...). Bigger question, it says that LAX-DXB has almost a half a million pax for 2015, when it was only daily on an A380 (until mid way through 2016) with probably 1000 max a day. Who can write something explaining this stuff? I'm so curious.

0
‼ 0
John Member

@Anuj Yes, you should contact Etihad as the San Francisco flight will be reduced down to Monday, Thursday and Saturday. @Aaron Completely agreed!! :) Would love to see the statistics

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published