Why I 100% Blame United Airlines For Dog’s Death, Not Fellow Passengers

Earlier I wrote about the heartbreaking story of how a United flight attendant instructed a passenger to place her dog (in a carrier) in an overhead bin, and at the end of the flight the dog was found dead. As someone who loves dogs (probably) far too much, I’m so disturbed and enraged by the story.

At a minimum I hope that the flight attendants gets seriously disciplined. If an investigation determines that the flight attendant was aware there was a dog in there (which every eyewitness report corroborates) I’d like to see the flight attendant fired and/or face animal cruelty charges, though I doubt that will happen. Dogs are part of the family for many people, so I can’t even imagine what a horrible, helpless situation this must have been.

Several readers have asked some valid questions about how this could have possibly happened. Why would the lady follow the flight attendant’s instructions to place her dog in the overhead bin? Why didn’t any of the other passengers around her who witnessed the situation say anything? Of course hindsight is 20/20, and I think we’re all thinking to ourselves that if this were our dog, it wouldn’t have happened.

However, I can see exactly what transpired that caused this to happen, and I put the blame squarely on the flight attendant for not following procedures.

What do I think lead to this?

Clearly the passenger was overwhelmed

For a vast majority of people, flying is stressful, and it isn’t a weekly occurrence. I imagine that this woman felt significantly more stress than most travelers — she was traveling with a teenager, an infant, and a dog. Clearly she was just trying to get through the day. Eyewitness reports suggest that she tried to push back firmly when the flight attendant requested she place the dog in the overhead bin. Eventually she gave in, as presumably she didn’t want to be kicked off the plane. She also probably assumed that if the flight attendant was recommending it, it must be safe.

Some say “well maybe she shouldn’t have traveled with a teenager, an infant, and a dog.” Why not? There’s no airline policy against that, and an airlines’ most important task is to transport people safely. Furthermore, we don’t know what circumstances she had. Sure, traveling like that probably isn’t ideal, but would it have been safer for them to drive for four days?

Why didn’t other passengers do anything?

For better or worse, we’re sheep when we go to the airport. Airlines have conditioned us that way. We wait in a check-in line. We wait in a security line. We wait in a line to board the plane. We get yelled at and threatened if we don’t follow instructions. As much as we’d like to think that’s not the case, just about any experiment supports this theory even in circumstances that are significantly less stressful than going to the airport. We assume that if everyone else is doing something, it’s okay. Conversely, we assume that if no one else is saying anything, it must be okay as well. We’d like to think that’s not the case, but it absolutely is.

Here’s an old video that demonstrates exactly the peer pressure we succumb to:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BgRoiTWkBHU

“Follow crewmember instructions at all time”

How many stories have gone viral over the years of passengers being removed from planes? It has gotten to the point where we’re afraid to speak up. We’re afraid it’ll mean that we get kicked off the plane by an employee on a power trip. Passengers watched without comment as Dr. Dao was violently removed from a plane, causing permanent damage. Why would things be different here?

Airlines are different than most other businesses, because it’s one of the few for-profit businesses where employees are allowed to threaten passengers without fear of repercussions.

When you add in our general sheep mentality on planes, and the stress of airports, and the fear we have of airline employees (which is exactly how they want us to feel), you have the perfect recipe for something like this to happen.

I didn’t realize being in an overhead bin would kill a dog

I feel like I should add this as well, because I’m curious if I’m in the minority here. Clearly this isn’t my area of expertise, but I wouldn’t have assumed that putting a dog in the overhead bin was particularly dangerous. Don’t get me wrong. it doesn’t seem especially safe (in terms of the risk of carry-on items shifting around), but I also wouldn’t have assumed that this was extremely dangerous. Then again, I’m not sure if the dog suffocated, if it had a heart attack, or if it got crushed by other bags (all of which are horrible scenarios).

I’m curious if others feel differently? If I had witnessed this I would have probably thought that it seems very unusual and not particularly safe, but my initial reaction wouldn’t have been “OMG the dog is going to die in there.” I suspect others on this flight felt the same way? I’d like to think that if anyone thought the dog was going to die, they would have spoken up.

Bottom line

For the above reasons I think the blame for this situation falls squarely on the flight attendant (and the airline, for their culture). Several eyewitness reports confirm that the flight attendant was aware there was a dog in there. The bag in question was also very clearly a pet carrier. Presumably at check-in an agent verified the size and weight of the dog and carrier, to ensure it was compliant.

No matter how you slice it, the flight attendant was being negligent, in my opinion:

  • Even if the flight attendant wasn’t aware that this was life threatening, crews are taught to follow protocols, and there’s no protocol for placing dogs in the overhead bin
  • If this was an issue of the lady having too many bags, or something, then she should have been presented with the option to check a bag or deplane; putting the dog in a situation like that isn’t appropriate

So I guess the way I view it, airlines can’t have it both ways. If flight attendants are flight safety professionals and their orders must be followed at all times, then they’re 100% responsible when they go off script. I’m going to assume that the flight attendant wasn’t a dog-hater who wanted to murder the poor dog. But that doesn’t make her any less responsible.

I’ll be curious to see how United’s flight attendant union, the AFA, responds to this. The AFA constantly stresses how the most important duty of flight attendants is safety. Will they try to defend this flight attendant even though she clearly violated the safety protocols, or will they take a stand and say that this is wrong?

I also wonder how United responds. They say they are “thoroughly investigating what occurred to prevent this from ever happening again.” Hopefully United has learned from their past mistakes, does a thorough investigation, and releases to the public what is being done to prevent something like this from happening in the future. It just blows my mind how one airline is able to consistently dig themselves such deep holes.

Conversations (176)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

James Litz Guest

I totally agree that the flight attendant and the United Airlines was absolutely at fault on this. Everyone needs oxygen to breath as do animals. A small dog in a bag and then put in a holding for baggage that can't have much if any fresh air coming in is asking for trouble. Why didn't the check-in agent inform this lady about her pet. I really can believe what came out of all this and to me I smell something rotten. I live on Guam and United is the only airline that flies to and from Hawaii with pets. Before all this happened with the small dog in the bin you could ship a pet in cargo from Hawaii to Guam for around $300.00 due to the flight being a domestic flight to a U.S. territory. Now you need to go through IPATA because they change the flight to International. IPATA requires you use one of their pet shipping firms that charge a lot of money. United only lets active military and state department people pets now. The citizens of Guam are stuck with not being able to ship or enjoy a new import family member do to all this happening. I think this was a set up to make the Airlines and investors more money. The people of Guam are being robbed of their money paying to enjoy a pet or trying to buy one for some happiness. This all needs to STOP and allow people the right to own an animal. This is the United States not some communist 3rd world country. Thank you for writing this article about the fault of United Airlines killing an innocent dog.

0
‼ 0
patricia wright Guest

i would have removed myself from the stupid plant my dog would mean more to me than a trip someone should have said something or removed the pup from the overhead luggage area these people had done everything for their pet to be placed under their seat which is still uncomfortalbe for a small dog Get off the plane the next time and take your pet with you or leave your pet with a responsible person to care for it at home

0
‼ 0
Steve Guest

"I’m curious if others feel differently? If I had witnessed this I would have probably thought that it seems very unusual and not particularly safe, but my initial reaction wouldn’t have been “OMG the dog is going to die in there.” I suspect others on this flight felt the same way? I’d like to think that if anyone thought the dog was going to die, they would have spoken up." AFAIK overhead storage on an airplane is not specifically vented in any manner. Not designed to be airtight but not vented to allow free flow of air either. Suffocation from CO2 buildup would seem to be a risk.

0
‼ 0
James Litz Guest

I live on Guam and United Airlines should be sued for what decisions they made after this incident occurred. United Airline is the only airline that flies directly to Hawaii and from Hawaii to Guam. There is an Air Force Base and a Naval Base on Guam. There are hundreds of military people here and many local people that love their pets like a family member. United just told everybody that they stopped shipping pets because of this incident happening. This left many service people and the local residents without any way to ship their pets off island. After numerous complaints from service people United decided to make military exempt from this. It left the local people handing with no way to bring or send their pets on/ off island. I called United Airline and they informed me that they will make a decision in May on if they will continue shipping pets. May finally came and they made a decision to continue pet shipping but it wouldn't be until the end of month to make reservations and then another week or so before they would ship the pets. United also made several changes in their pet travel plans and have put a burden on many families. United put several restrictions on what pets they would allow on the plane. There are many species of animal now that CANNOT fly on United. Not only did United decide to do this they also made the flight from Guam to Hawaii that was a domestic flight before in to an International flight. Before this change on the domestic flight it only cost $300.00 to ship your pet from Hawaii to Guam. Now that they made it an International flight you call United PET SAFE the company that ships animals for United and they will tell you that due to being an International flight you have to go through IPATA and use their IPATA member for your area to ship your pet if it is a species that is allowed. The price for a medium size dog went from $300.00 to $1,300.00 just to ship a pet. Remember that United is THE ONLY Airline that flies back and forth to Hawaii from Guam. United has made having a pet on Guam in to something that most military and locals can't afford. I wanted to buy a pure bred dog located on Hawaii and ship it to Guam. The dog was a puppy only 9 weeks old and United IPATA member quoted me a price of $1,170.00 just to ship the dog. Pets are part of our family and many people need pets for companions to make their lives happier. Why can United Airlines hold the entire island of Guam from getting pets to and from the island? Our military as well. These people have given so much for our Country and they deserve the right to have pets as family members. As it is currently with United if you have a Pug, Shi-Tzu, and many other breed of dog and you need to be relocated off island or move to the States you will have to sell your pet or put it in an animal shelter. This is not correct for people to just give up a loving family member. Not only that you give up your pet but be charged way to much for shipping your pet if allowed. This all came about because of United having out of control power minded people working for them. The people on Guam are being treated very bad with United Airlines pet transportation. This needs to STOP and let people have some happiness with their pets. I'm really amazed that our local Government hasn't done anything about this. I believe United Airlines and the local Government are working together and they are aware of all the heart break they are causing with our pets. What if you had children that loved their dog. Then you had to tell them that we need to sell the pet or put it in an animal shelter because of these stupid new regulations that got put in place. People can't even have pets anymore. WOW what is this world coming too.

0
‼ 0
Jeff Guest

This situation is horrible. Having lost dogs unexpectedly, i can sympothize with the family. That said, I find it interesting how many people call for the FA to be fired and state that the passenger was not at fault in any way. A couple of key points: 1. The dog carrier was protruding into the aisle and didn't fit under the seat. All passengers know the rules and they are clearly stated when you book your ticket and state you will have a pet. If the carrier was too big, the passenger is partially at fault and also the gate agents who let her board. The FA is responsible for the safety of all passengers and had to clear the areas. 2. Nobody checked the dog during the flight. They could have checked on the dog and taken the carrier down from the overhead during the flight - just had it up there for takeoff and landing. To state that the FA was completely at fault and the passenger(s) were not at fault at all is ignoring the basic facts of the situation and that we have to have some responsibility for our own actions. How many time do we see passengers push the boundaries and then blame the airline. If you are traveling with an animal, as the owner you need to take responsibility for the animals safety.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published