Could Starwood Merge With IHG Or Wyndham?

In mid-February Starwood’s CEO, Frits van Paasschen, suddenly resigned. This was a bit of a surprising move, given that Starwood didn’t have a permanent CEO replacement ready to go.

This was probably related to the fact that Starwood’s stock hasn’t been performing as well as some investors had hoped. This seems to be linked to Starwood growing at a fairly slow rate, in particular in the limited service hotel sector.

There’s no arguing that Starwood is way behind when it comes to limited service hotels, especially when you look at the offerings of Hilton and Marriott. As a customer that’s something I’m fine with, ultimately, since limited service properties aren’t really something I’m after. But of course shareholders are going to have a different take, since it’s also a sector where there’s a lot of growth potential.

SpringHill-Suites
SpringHill Suites, one of Marriott’s limited service brands

Bloomberg ran a story yesterday about how IHG or Wyndham merging with or taking over Starwood is a distinct possibility:

While InterContinental’s 6.4 billion pound ($9.6 billion) market value is smaller than Starwood, the company is more expensive relative to sales and profit, which would pose a challenge for any deal.

“Starwood has a lot of concentration at the high end of the hotel segment, but that’s not where the growth is, so they need some balance,” Nikhil Bhalla, an analyst for FBR & Co., said in a phone interview. “But in this stage of the cycle, they’re going to have to pay up to acquire any brands and that may not be accretive. So I think the best route for Starwood would be a sale of the company.”

SunTrust’s Scholes said it might be a good fit for Wyndham, which at $11 billion is slightly smaller than Starwood. Wyndham lacks higher-end brands, which is a drawback because customers that are loyal to certain hotels like to have options depending on their type of travel, he said.

Wyndham CEO Thomas Conforti has said the company is looking for acquisitions. Small transactions are more likely, but “should a big deal come up that’s compelling and helps us achieve our objectives, we wouldn’t shy away from it,” Conforti said last month during an analyst conference. A representative for Wyndham declined to comment.

While I’m not sure a merger with IHG or Wyndham is necessarily the answer, I’d be willing to bet we’re going to see some serious changes with Starwood, whatever form they come in.

On the surface Wyndham and Starwood seem fairly complementary, given that Starwood has a large variety of high end hotels, while Wyndham has a large variety of lower end hotels.

That being said, as an SPG loyalist, it would be terrible news, as I’m sure the program would change drastically.

To clarify, as someone obsessed with loyalty programs, I’m not opposed to all mergers/takeovers. For example, IHG taking over Kimpton was positive news for my stay patterns.

I love Kimpton properties, but their portfolio isn’t big enough for me to exclusively be loyal to them. While that takeover is likely terrible news for Kimpton Karma Rewards loyalists, it’s positive news for people like me, who like to occasionally stay at Kimptons, but can’t justify staying at them dozens of nights per year. Hopefully soon enough I’ll be able to redeem my IHG Rewards Club points and free night certificates at Kimpton properties.

Kimpton-InnerCircle-Welcome-Amenity
I’d expect Kimpton’s amazing personalized loyalty program to be discontinued at some point

Meanwhile for my needs, Starwood is a big enough brand so that I wouldn’t really benefit from the much larger portfolio, and it would no doubt lead to Starwood Preferred Guest being gutted. There does seem to be a pretty direct inverse correlation between elite benefits and the number of limited service properties a brand has.

I do hope Starwood will remain independent, though to do so they’ll need to make some serious changes to keep their investors happy.

What’s your take on this — what would you like to see Starwood do, and what do you think is likely to happen? 

Conversations (27)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Barbara Insider Guest

Recent articles concerning Starwood's "baffling" behaviour and its "flamboyant and costly moves" have been intriguing to say the least. Most people are unaware that Starwood and the Board of Directors are currently on course to be investigated for corruption and conspiracy to defraud investors. Ask Adam Aron and Bruce Duncan to lift the corporate veil as they are the co-architects (along with Frits van Paasschen) of this breach of trust. Plea-bargaining with the regulators is likely before any further grandiose statements can be made.

0
‼ 0
Partjos Guest

Wyndham has just launched a new Rewards program...perhaps that was what was needed for Starwood to consider this 'partnership'. Now there is no distinction on points nor is there a difference in how many points it takes to stay at any property at any location...if a program like this will transfer over, staying at a higher end property will be easier to do. All points are redeemable and there are no black out dates....you all should check it out ,

0
‼ 0
bobbieddie New Member

Lucky - thanks for this heads up. In light of this would you please give us a summation of all the options for transferring SPG points and whether/not you'd be unloading some now just based on this news. Thanks.

0
‼ 0
DCS Diamond

@eponymous coward -- You make so much sense that I feel compelled to slightly amend and recycle the following comment that I made in a discussion on the JD Power survey, which that blog's host had completely dismissed as useless, and this site did not even mention. The dismissal of this survey by bloggers, though one or two gave it a fair shake, can be explained as follows: the travel bloggers are buried so deep within their little blogosphere echo chamber, reinforcing one another’s — often erroneous — perceptions, that they get shocked when they see some of the choices that real people out there make regarding their preferred loyalty programs. Like most surveys, the JD Power loyalty schtick does have its issues, but the company has built a decent reputation for “surveys of customer satisfaction, product quality, and buyer behavior for industries ranging from cars to marketing and advertising firm.” Therefore, they cannot be dismissed outright as one would a lesser entity. So, people are talking about this survey, which, in fact, qualitatively agrees with my own perceptions (for example, I rate Hilton Honors -- tied for first place in the JD Power survey of 16 hotel loyalty programs -- much higher than the bloggers because I consider it to be a much more “mature” program). However, unless a survey places Hyatt or SPG at the top, its rating of hotel loyalty programs would not be considered credible by the loyalty/travel bloggers. I have often expounded on why the placing of Hyatt GP — a loyalty program that is, at best, a work-in-progress and was ranked 9th out of 16 by JD Power — on a pedestal is misguided, or that SPG [ranked 14th out of 16] is one of the least attractive programs because their awards are too expensive in relation to one’s ability to earn Startpoints, but this has simply been ignored in favor of the conventional travel blogosphere “wisdom”. IHG has been one of the hottest tickets of late, but the bloggers have been absolutely brutal in tearing them down. However, notice that real folks out there do seem to like IHG [ranked 4th] just fine… I think that some of the travel bloggers and their equally insular readers need to get out there in the real world from time to time… ;-)

0
‼ 0
Kieran Guest

Christian's analysis certainly sheds light on this issue, and I would be loathe to see reckless growth (that ends up with SPG having less control over it's portfolio) given priority over sustained well managed expansion - even if it takes longer. The rise of limited service properties is just a reflection of the trailing edge of the economic cycle. It seems very unwise to rapidly restructure for what has gone before, rather than position for what is coming up. It seems to me SPG would be better off just increasing it's Aloft, Element and Four Points properties or looking at acquiring just one budget brand to add to the portfolio if it wanted to add downturn protection (Premier Inn maybe) - rather than selling the farm and it's identity.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published