China Loosens Restrictions On International Flights, But Is It Enough?

Update: See here for the latest decision from the US DOT.

Well that didn’t take long — the Civil Aviation Authority of China (CAAC) has reversed its stance on international airline service just hours after the US Department of Transportation (DOT) banned Chinese airlines from flying to the United States.

China’s “unfair” aviation policy

Yesterday the DOT banned Chinese airlines effective June 16, 2020. The reason was because China was refusing to allow any US airlines to fly to China, even though four Chinese airlines continue to fly to the US.

What essentially happened is that China (rather arbitrarily and retroactively) claimed that airlines could only offer as much service to China as they offered on March 12, 2020. As of March 12 no US airlines flew to China (in light of the current pandemic), and as a result China has argued that US airlines shouldn’t be allowed to fly to China at all.

That’s perhaps an oversimplification, but I wanted to keep the recap as short as possible, so check out my previous post for all the details.

US airlines were essentially banned from flying to China

China backtracks, will allow one weekly flight

The CAAC has backtracked. As of June 8, 2020, foreign airlines can fly one international passenger flight to one mainland Chinese city each week. This applies exclusively to countries that previously served China, and therefore for countries that China has a bilateral aviation agreement with (since the country doesn’t participate in Open Skies).

This will allow many airlines — including American, Delta, and United, in the US — to resume service to China. The once weekly limit is a major restriction, though, since it means between the three airlines there would only be three weekly flights.

US airlines can now offer three weekly flights to China

China will punish airlines that bring in COVID-19

The CAAC is also creating a punishment and reward system to encourage airlines to not transport passengers with COVID-19:

  • If an airline for three consecutive weeks doesn’t transport any passengers on flights to China who test positive for COVID-19, they will be allowed to open one more flight to China each week
  • If an airline transports five passengers on flights to China who test positive for COVID-19, flights to China will be suspended for a week, while if the number reaches 10, flights will be suspended for four weeks

I can appreciate China wanting to do what it can to minimize the number of incoming COVID-19 cases, though one has to wonder how airlines could act differently in light of this policy.

The reality is that US airlines may encourage passengers to wear masks and may do temperature checks, but aside from that there’s not really a mechanism by which US airlines are testing people for COVID-19.

Unless US airlines add some sort of additional screening, this unfortunately seems like something airlines won’t have much control over. The reality is that the airport experience is very different in China than in the US.

China will punish airlines transporting COVID-19 positive passengers

Will one weekly flight be enough, though?

While I’m sure US airlines are happy to see the CAAC so quickly reverse its stance, the battle isn’t over for US airlines. Now each US airline can operate a single weekly flight to China, but we’ve repeatedly heard US airline executives say that’s not enough.

The economics of once weekly service just don’t work well, since it means crews would need to lay over for an entire week (or deadhead back), which just isn’t realistic.

For example, United shows daily flights between San Francisco and Shanghai for at least a week in July, so clearly something is going to have to give.

In fairness, China is applying the same rule to Chinese airlines, so this isn’t a case of China being unfair towards foreign airlines.

US airlines want more than one weekly flight to China

Bottom line

It’s nice to see the CAAC backtracking so quickly on its unfair aviation policy. China often doesn’t give in so easily, so I could have also seen this spat lasting much longer.

Even with this permission, though, it doesn’t change the fact that once weekly service just isn’t viable for many US airlines, so there’s more to this battle.

The concept of creating a rewards system around not bringing in passengers with coronavirus makes sense on the surface, but realistically that’s not something that US airlines are really positioned to police at the moment.

Conversations (34)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

tcchoi New Member

After all, we need to understand the reason that the virus is spread to the current level throughout the world. Sometime in December, the virus was found to make someone sick in Wuhan at the Huanan Seafood Market, which becomes the 2019-nCoV. Then it was known to the world to be similar to SARS and deadly. But people throughout the world do not know its existence outside of Asia. It then spread throughout, and a few cases were confirmed outside China, in Thailand, Japan, Hong Kong, et Cetra. it continue to spread into the western world, and then a cruise was hit, Diamond Princess a parked in Japan, with hundreds of cases confirmed in the cruise and those who had ridden the cruise. And later it becomes a global pandemic, given the name COVID-19. WHO chairman Tedros had been advising the country do not to block China as a way to track outsourcing coronavirus cases. The WHO had failed to control the spread of coronavirus, which was thought to have only cause 80k cases and thousands of cases, but that number seems extremely false when the cases around the world skyrocketed, with 100k cases in European countries with less than 1/20 of the population in China. I do not understand how anyone could still trust China, especially in reporting cases. Being from Hong Kong and had been through SARS in 2003, I know how China had been hiding information that would otherwise be useful from the international community, including the so-called Chinese Hong Kong SAR. China is just not trustworthy.

0
‼ 0
Alan Diamond

@Joseph N Here's an excellent article on Mongolia's covid response. https://medium.com/@indica/covid-underdogs-mongolia-3b0c162427c2 And yes they did listen to China. I love how so many want to bash China but not a single person ever can ever provide any evidence to show that Beijing and Shanghai had large outbreaks. Just accept it - the US screwed up big time and those of us Americans living overseas are still going to be screwed by having a worthless passport. Thank you so much US govt (and both parties are to blame)!!!

0
‼ 0
Joseph N. Guest

@Alan, do you think anyone believes that? No, it is because Vietnam did NOT listen to the PRC and their lackeys at the WHO that the Viets had so few cases. NOT trusting the PRC is also the reason why Taiwan, Japan and Singapore had so few cases. There is a plethora of articles all over the internet detailing this. @BigG I have seen a building full of PLA operatives flood an internet bulletin board with these anonymous comments so many times that at this point I simply find the comments above to be comical.

0
‼ 0
Alan Diamond

Why do so many bash China? The US had its first case prior to Wuhan being closed. So how is it possible that Beijing and Shanghai never had large outbreaks? Mongolia and Vietnam listened to China and have had very few cases. Had the US listened to China it would definitely not be in its current situation.

0
‼ 0
BigG Guest

50 cent army working hard . Cha Ching cha Ching from chairman Winnie Xi.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published