Ridiculous: Cathay Pacific CEO “Resigns” Suddenly

Cathay Pacific has just announced some shocking senior management changes. Obviously a lot has been going on in Hong Kong. There have been protests for months, and these have increasingly impacted the airport and airline over the past couple of weeks.

Rupert Hogg resigns as Cathay Pacific CEO

The Cathay Pacific Board of Directors has today announced that they’ve accepted the resignation of two senior executives:

Hogg said the following regarding his resignation:

“It has been my honour to lead the Cathay Pacific Group over the last three years. I am confident in the future of Hong Kong as the key aviation hub in Asia. However, these have been challenging weeks for the airline and it is right that Paul and I take responsibility as leaders of the company.”

As you can see, he says that it has been a challenging few weeks for the company, and that it’s “right” that he “takes responsibility” for this. So this isn’t a resignation based on spending more time with his family or whatever reason executives otherwise want to give, but rather very clearly is a response to what has been going on.

Here’s what Cathay Pacific’s Chairman, John Slosar, said about these resignations:

“Rupert Hogg and his team executed the three-year Transformation Programme which has been important to Cathay Pacific’s recovery and provides a strong platform for continued development. However, recent events have called into question Cathay Pacific’s commitment to flight safety and security and put our reputation and brand under pressure. This is regrettable as we have always made safety and security our highest priority. We therefore think it is time to put a new management team in place who can reset confidence and lead the airline to new heights. Cathay Pacific is fully committed to Hong Kong under the principle of ‘One Country Two Systems’ as enshrined in the Basic Law.”

Cathay Pacific’s new executive appointments

Cathay Pacific has already appointed replacements:

  • Augustus Tang has been appointed CEO; he is currently the CEO of aircraft maintenance and engineering company HAECO, which has the same parent company as Cathay Pacific
  • Ronald Lam has been appoint Chief Customer & Commercial Officer; he was recently appointed CEO of HK Express, which Cathay Pacific acquired

What did Cathay Pacific executives really do wrong?

With protests in Hong Kong escalating, we’ve seen Hong Kong’s airport and largest airline increasingly be involved here.

For one, Hong Kong Airport closed a couple of times due to the number of protestors, bringing the airport to a standstill.

More specific to Cathay Pacific, the Chinese government has accused Cathay Pacific employees of participating in “illegal protests,” and requested that the airline start sharing all information about employees not only flying to China, but also passing through Chinese airspace.

The airline ended up firing a few employees who participated in protests.

As far as I’m concerned here, Cathay Pacific has done absolutely nothing wrong, and has balanced their interests best they can. They’re truly stuck between a rock and a hard place, and didn’t have much of a choice:

  • I believe fundamentally the company shares the sentiments of those who are protesting; obviously not the entire company, but at least a majority of the employees and much of the management
  • At the same time, defying China couldn’t possibly end well for them, given that China doesn’t exactly cave easily

So now you have this absolute mess of a situation. Cathay Pacific is putting a new management team in place to “reset confidence” after “Cathay Pacific’s commitment to flight safety and security” has been called into question.

Conversations (106)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

TheTruthIs Member

Ha Ha! See you later Chinese propaganda bots! Go somewhere else and try to trick others into believing Beijing's propaganda. Most of the world disbelieves it and probably most mainland Chinese too.

0
‼ 0
Anthony Guest

The truthls - LOLLLLLLLL. What an unhinged nutter you're! You idiot are beyond redemption. I'm done with this topic and see you no more muppet.

0
‼ 0
Scott Guest

Thetruthis - LMAO, you just ate your words and made a fool of yourself! You idiot. Your parents obviously didn't teach you that you're living in a world of fake news and never ending lies. It will be a total waste of air& time to talk to an intellectually challenged imbecile and nut case like you again.

0
‼ 0
ThetruthIs Member

Scott - I won't take the time to dismantle your propaganda because what you are is a Beijing Propaganda Bot. Besides no one is reading this string any longer.

0
‼ 0
Scott Guest

Good Riddance. Cathay asked for it. How can their management be so dumb and irresponsible. They need to pay the price for their stupidity, endangering the lives of travelling passengers: it’s plain common sense – pilots and air hostesses are not supposed to engage in any such anti-social activities that are in direct conflict with their day-to-day jobs. Airports are a virtual home for pilots and air hostesses. There is no better example of a direct conflict of interests. It’s incumbent upon any Airline employer to immediately fire any of their airline employees who participate in such anti Govt rallies associated with rioting, arson and destruction of public property. Not doing so, geometrically increases the risks to all flights and their passengers. These airline personnel have direct access to security areas within the Immigration area and to critical areas on the aircraft’s in which they fly. What’s to prevent delinquent airline personnel from carrying out sabotage or acts of terrorism. Today it’s protesting and rioting at the airport terminal, tomorrow these radicalised nut cases could carry an offensive weapon or explosives on to the aircraft. Simply cannot be tolerated. They are free to resign from their jobs and become professional rioters. If not they should be fired forthwith and banned from the airlines. Senior management at Cathay who didn’t display simple common sense and responsibility to allow this to happen should also be placed under scrutiny for their sheer incompetence. Don’t blame China for Cathay Pacific’s mismanagement and downfall. Chinese authorities, CAAC had already given CX the choice. Don’t fly into mainland China’s airspace and CX doesn’t need to comply with their directives. This was very clearly stated. Their country, their law.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published