SkyTeam Is Forcing American & China Southern To Scale Back Their Codeshares

In early 2017, American Airlines bought a $200 million stake in Guangzhou-based China Southern Airlines. On some level this was surprising, given that prior to this the two airlines didn’t cooperate in any way. They had no codeshare agreements, and American doesn’t even fly to to Guangzhou. American said that this investment “creates a strong foundation for a long-term relationship between two of the world’s biggest carriers.”

It didn’t seem to me like they had huge plans overnight, though rather this seemed somewhat reactionary, as Delta bought a stake in China Eastern a few years back, while American doesn’t have a single partner airline based in mainland China.

When this partnership first launched, American and China Southern announced their intentions to begin codesharing, with the ability to earn and redeem miles, through-check bags, and book travel on both carriers on a single ticket, but only on codeshare routes.

Let’s keep in mind that on top of that there have been rumors of China Southern leaving SkyTeam and joining oneworld. If it weren’t for Cathay Pacific, this seems very likely to me, as oneworld doesn’t have an airline based in mainland China, while China Southern has second-rate status in SkyTeam, given Delta’s close partnership with China Eastern.

The issue is that Cathay Pacific has veto power in oneworld, and many think that they wouldn’t want another airline to join that’s based so close to Hong Kong. This has also lead to rumors of Cathay Pacific leaving oneworld and joining Star Alliance, though I doubt that’s going to happen.

Anyway, while the relationship between American and China Southern isn’t that close yet, it looks like it’s already too close for SkyTeam. Aviation Week is reporting that as of January 18, 2018, American and China Southern are being forced to reduce their number of codeshare routes from 29 to 16.

Under this revised agreement:

  • China Southern Will codeshare on American’s flights from Los Angeles to Chicago, Charlotte, Houston, Philadelphia, and Phoenix, as well as American’s flights from San Francisco to Dallas and Phoenix
  • American will codeshare on China Southern’s flights from Beijing to Changchun, Changsha, Chongqing, Guangzhou, Dalian, Harbin, Nanning, Shenyang, and Shenzhen

So, why are the two airlines having to scale back their relationship with one another? Allegedly because China Southern has exceeded the maximum number of codeshare routes allowed by SkyTeam with non-alliance airlines. I wasn’t aware this was a restriction, but SkyTeam limits the number of codeshare routes that airlines can have with airlines not belonging to the alliance. Keep in mind this isn’t China Southern’s only codeshare agreement out of the alliance. They even recently announced a codeshare agreement with British Airways.

There are an increasing number of reasons that China Southern should leave SkyTeam and join oneworld, though it looks like the only thing standing in the way is Cathay Pacific…

Conversations (30)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

ccuctuscat Guest

CZ doesn't have to join OW as long as they keep working closely with AA. AA would have more destinations in mainland China than solely depending on CX. Also, CZ would have more destinations in South America otherwise they have to invest so much money to get into those markets.

0
‼ 0
Tony Guest

Well, being an OW Elite member and living in Japan, have very few airline option to travel around Asia from here. (4 OW airlines comparing to 8 carriers on Star Alliance and even 6 on Sky Team) CX is good, MH isn't bad, but I avoid JL because I felt uncomfortable with the temperature inside the aircraft. According to a flight attendant (that answered me like a robot when I flew JL last time), temperature is always around 26/27C(81/783F) because japanese flyers "feel cold". I've heard *A ANA follows the same. 27C/83F all flight? Seriously?! CZ may not be the best option to join OW to replace AB, but I believe that having more carriers joining OW could improve their hubs not only in Asia. CX is comfortable (and not affordable) here because there's no other chinese on their way. Btw, I'll leave the OW to Star Alliance soon after having my cards expired.

0
‼ 0
Tam Guest

@JZ You serious? I would take MH over CZ any day. MH's main hub is a dump though CZ's is not that much better. But MH's onboard service is so much better than CZ.

0
‼ 0
Golfingboy Guest

Good points about HNA and Hong Kong Airlines... Completely forgot about that piece, hopefully one day HNA will go away (not a well run business) and spinoff the airlines into their own separate entities..

0
‼ 0
Kerry Diamond

@Golfingboy, Hainan owns Hong Kong Airlines, Cathay’s most bitter local competitor, so I would expect CX to have far more issues with Hainan joining OW, rather than CZ.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published