Airlines Ask Hong Kong To Waive Airport Fees

Hong Kong has seen a huge drop in visitors after months of protests, which have increasingly impacted the airport and airlines as well. Not only has the number of inbound travelers dropped, but given the disruptions the airport has seen, the number of connecting travelers has dropped in some cases as well.

How Much Has Demand In Hong Kong Dropped?

Hong Kong has seen a massive drop in visitors, including those traveling through the airport:

  • In August Hong Kong Airport saw a 12% drop in travelers overall
  • In August Hong Kong Airport saw a 38% decrease in O&D passengers (those arriving and departing there, rather than those connecting)
  • For the first 10 days of September Hong Kong saw a 90% drop in tour groups from China, following a 63% drop in August

Keep in mind that August was still a peak summer month, so it’s pretty likely that numbers will look even worse for the rest of the year.

Hong Kong

Some Airlines Have Cut Capacity

We’ve seen some airlines adjust capacity as a result of this. For example, Cathay Pacific has cut frequencies on some popular routes, while United has discontinued their Chicago to Hong Kong flight, and downgraded their flights from Newark and San Francisco to Hong Kong.

I expect we’ll continue to see airlines adjust capacity as a result of this situation.

United has already cut their Chicago to Hong Kong flight

Airlines Want Relief From The Airport

As reported by SCMP, In hopes of making flights to Hong Kong sustainable, the Board of Airline Representatives of Hong Kong has urged the airport to slash fees.

The organization represents over 70 airlines flying to Hong Kong, and they propose cutting the cost for airlines flying to & from Hong Kong, and even cutting the cost of rental fees for offices and lounge space at the airport, in an effort to provide some relief to airlines.

While some relief measures have been taken overall in Hong Kong, there hasn’t been anything specific for airlines yet. Aviation supports 330,000 jobs in Hong Kong and contributes over 10% to the city’s GDP.

Per the letter:

“In view of the situation, the BAR urges the Hong Kong government to consider issuing short-term relief measures that can help airlines survive this extremely difficult time.

It would definitely help if the government could temporarily waive these operating expenses so that airlines operating in Hong Kong can remain commercially viable.”

Hong Kong is known for having among the highest airport fees in the region. It’s noted that about 16% of Cathay Pacific’s operating costs are made up of airport and air traffic control fees, so this is a significant amount.

Hong Kong is also known for having among the highest fees in the region. On average, a Boeing 777-300ER flying to the airport would rack up over 110,000 HKD in fees, which is about 14,000 USD. This includes landing, parking, and passenger fees.

Airlines want Hong Kong Airport to cut their fees

Bottom Line

It’s a rough time in Hong Kong, and airlines are suffering. United President Scott Kirby has called the financial performance of Hong Kong flights “terrible” at this point, and I suspect they’re not alone right now in feeling that way.

It will be interesting to see if the airport is willing to waive some fees. In fairness, this wouldn’t be the first time they’ve done so, as they offered similar relief during the SARS crisis and financial crisis.

Given that Hong Kong has among the highest airport fees out there, it doesn’t seem unreasonable that airlines would want some short-term relief.

Conversations (30)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Daneils Guest

Eskimo, why bother listing colleges you never had a slight hope of attending? You're so off-topic 95% of the time. Same with the HK situation. Don't opinionate beyond your mental capacity. It's embarrassing to read. Even National Enquirer magazine is too sophisticated for you.

0
‼ 0
G Guest

I have no fear of transiting at HKG. I just bought my biz trip on CX from JFK to TPE via HKG for about US$4300 for traveling in mid-October. I do think HKG should give airlines some temporary relief on charges. HKG is a cash cow only if the cows are healthy!

0
‼ 0
cargocult Guest

I flew EWR-HKG (UA 179) on a 777-300ER in early September and noticed that the load was quite low. J was perhaps half full at check in and maybe two-thirds at most after upgrades were processed. The back of the plane was also sparsely populated, with many, if not most, passengers able to spread out in the proverbial "poor man's business class" configuration. The city itself also seemed quieter than usual and there was little vehicular traffic for a Friday night or Saturday morning. On a side note, I don't know how I ever chose to sit in the second J cabin in the past. 777 or 787, the second cabin is ridiculously loud and the floor/seat shakes horribly. I don't know if a larger footwell (if selecting a bulkhead seat) would compensate for this discomfort unless one were quite tall.

0
‼ 0
BillC Gold

@Eskimo -- "Too bad this isn’t humor nor this is anti-Trump. Millions paid the price of letting Nazi rise to power when many could have prevented. A lot of stuff can be done to stop juveniles creating anarchy. Neither does Trump, a person know to stir conflict and ignores one-China, is the right person to help make peace with China." So your attempt to associate Trump with Nazis (as implied in your post above) is *not* anti-Trump? How about you enumerate specifically *what* Trump has actually *done* to "stir conflict" in Hong Kong, anyway? Are you even aware of what Joshua Wong requested in his meeting with the USA Congress? He put forth the following propositions to the USA Congress -- #1. Pass the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act #2. Add a human-rights clause related to the Hong Kong protests into trade negotiations between the US and China #3. Stop exporting riot weapons to Hong Kong's police force On top of everything, he even chided Trump for *not* sufficiently supporting the HK protest activities, and "bending" too much towards China's position, to the detriment of HK's future prospects for continued liberties and freedoms! So ... clarify *further* what you meant in your post about Trump stirring conflict and ignoring China's position, regarding the HK protests?

0
‼ 0
HongKonger Guest

For the past few years I've been flying SFO-HKG (and back again) on a bi-weekly basis on United in Polaris. I haven't seen a noticeable decrease in the amount of passengers in Polaris since the protests began this summer. Nor have I seen a decline in the ticket prices. Similar to the protests in Greece about a decade ago the violence here has been mainly concentrated to a few small parts of the city. Also similar to the Greek protests the media flees peaceful marches when they hear that something is on fire in a different district.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published