Air Greenland’s Record-Breaking Turboprop Flight

Air Greenland was making headlines a few weeks ago for their transatlantic turboprop flights, but they’ve just operated a flight that’s in a league of its own.

In late March I wrote a post titled “Air Greenland’s Fascinating 8-Hour Turboprop Flight,” about the way in which they were operating flights between Greenland and Copenhagen:

  • Air Greenland has suspended regular passenger operations
  • The airline continued to operate a link to Copenhagen for medical staff, COVID-19 tests, and more
  • The airline has a single A330 that they usually fly between Kangerlussuaq and Copenhagen, though the plane is currently undergoing maintenance, and offers way too much capacity anyway
  • As a result, Air Greenland has been operating nearly eight hour flights between Nuuk and Copenhagen, with a stop in Keflavik, Iceland

Air Greenland flies 7hr52min nonstop on Dash 8

In recent days Air Greenland took Copenhagen service to a whole new level:

  • On Sunday, April 19, 2020, Air Greenland operated a 7hr25min nonstop flight from Nuuk to Copenhagen
  • On Monday, April 20, 2020, Air Greenland operated a 7hr52min nonstop flight from Copenhagen to Nuuk

The flight was operated by a 23 year old Dash 8-200 with the registration code OY-GRP. The 2,200+ mile flight overflew Denmark, Norway, the Shetland Islands, the Faroe Islands, and Iceland. In the event of an emergency, they had plenty of diversion airports, including Stavanger, Vagar, Egilsstadir, Keflavik, and Kulusuk.

The flight from Nuuk to Copenhagen was being operated as an evacuation flight for an insurance company (with a patient onboard, in addition to the crew), and then the return flight became historic. The return flight had four people, including two pilots, one flight attendant, and one doctor.

The 7hr52min flight on Monday is historic for a couple of reasons:

  • It’s allegedly the longest Dash 8-200 flight ever
  • It’s the first ever nonstop flight from Copenhagen to Nuuk (the airport only has a runway of 3,100 feet)

How is this nonstop flight possible?

Believe it or not, the plane wasn’t reconfigured with extra fuel tanks, or anything, but rather because the plane was so empty it was able to operate this journey nonstop. The plane landed back in Nuuk with another 400 kilos of fuel, and the captain says that they could have flown for another hour.

He also said that they could fly nonstop from Nuuk to Copenhagen with up to 10 passengers, assuming the winds aren’t unfavorable.

Since the plane had no cargo, they actually had to weigh it down a bit for weight and balance.

As of April 17, 2020, Air Greenland is cutting the “air bridge” between Greenland and Denmark. As mentioned above, the primary reason for this was that COVID-19 testing wasn’t possible in Greenland.

Now Greenland has their own testing equipment, and therefore the link is no longer needed between the two places. You can expect some flights to continue, but not as many as in the past.

This also means that they can shut down their temporary Copenhagen base. The way the airline had staffed these flights is quite interesting — Air Greenland had crews temporarily based in Copenhagen, and crews based in Nuuk (as usual).

The plane would refuel in Keflavik, and they’d trade crews there. That meant that one crew would fly from Nuuk to Keflavik to Nuuk, and the other crew would fly from Copenhagen to Keflavik to Copenhagen. This was intended to minimize the movement of crews as a preventive measure for COVID-19.

Bottom line

What an unbelievable nonstop flight Air Greenland operated. I’ve been dreaming about being on many of the cool one-off flights we’re seeing right now (like the Titan Airways A318 to Saint Helena), though I have to say that an eight hour turboprop flight isn’t one that tempts me very much.

What a cool journey, though!

(Tip of the hat to Matthias, featured image courtesy of Quintin Soloviev)

Conversations (17)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

James McDermott Guest

Naive question but might turboprops make something of a comeback with the need for planes that can do longer routes with fewer passengers and still make a profit? I know the A321xxx is moving into that territory but would costs be low enough? I can see people going for a (much?) longer flight if the price were low enough and seats comfortable/roomy enough. I have a somewhat silly vision in my head of an updated Dash-7 (to satisfy ETOPS) doing this. For a jet version, maybe a BAE-146 with updated, more efficient engines, larger fuel tanks and possibly reduced pax capacity. Just crazy ideas that've run through my head after reading articles predicting the number of de facto long, thin routes skyrocketting as a result of Covid.

0
‼ 0
George Olson Guest

1960 long flight with engines going in and out of syncronasation on a TEAL - later Air NZ Super Connie from Nandi to Auckland . Just as you were ready to drift off all 4 would sync and really shake it up. 168 got lucky and crossed the Indian Ocean in a QUANTAS Electra from Perth to Cocus Keeling then to Maritius.1st hop was 8 and 2nd was 10 as I remember. Long slog but no piston sync problems. I was a teenager and Mom raised the arm rests and lay across the seats while I stretched out on the floor. We we're lucky because Sud Afrikanse operated the route with DC7's which toook looonger and 4 big radials needing to be synced. Friends of took DC7 a year later and I watched the takeoff. Boy was that slooow they used pretty much the whole runway and it was the slowest climb out I have ever saw.

0
‼ 0
Pierre Diamond

@ Al, It can't be treated as "domestic" because of the stop in LAX (not only because of US insisting on transit pax needing to enter and leave US, but because of passengers mix onboard, some going to LAX). Stop in LAX is changing, though see Ben's article recently. Besides, France has always had a "mixed" arrangement regarding all flights from "DOM/TOM" (French overseas communities), with passengers arriving in France needing to go through customs (not Immigration) due to different taxation regimes in some overseas areas, nothing heavy handed but existing.

0
‼ 0
Al New Member

Is (was?) AF’s (or Tahiti Nui’s, I can’t remember which) flight Paris to Papeete (w/a stop at LAX) treated as “domestic”? I have been on a Longyearbyen to Oslo n/s, and it was treated as domestic. I think the flight was 6 hours, more or less.

0
‼ 0
Michael Member

If the runway is only 3100 feet, how did the a330 that used to fly there operate? I might have misread what was flying there before

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published