Air Canada Is Selling 787s And Then Leasing Them Back

Reader Cole posted in the Ask Lucky forum about how Air Canada is selling some 787s, and then leasing them back. This is actually something that’s a lot more common than most people realize, which is why I think it’s an interesting topic to briefly cover.

Air-Canada-Business-Class-787 - 65

Essentially Air Canada has sold two of their newest 787s for $351 million and then leased them back, allowing them to record a $19 million gain on the sale (which is perhaps more of an accounting exercise than anything). They plan on doing this for more 787s, and possibly other planes in the future as well.

Air Canada negotiated a deal with Boeing when they ordered the planes many years ago (as is standard when ordering in bulk), and the market price is now slightly higher than what they had negotiated at the time. So they’re planning on selling about 10 of their 787s over the coming years, and then leasing them back.

What’s the logic? Per the story in The Globe And Mail:

The goal is to maintain a fleet that is half owned and half leased. Leasing helps keep debt down. If the market for 787s stays healthy – driven in part by its popularity among airlines, which is demonstrated by a long waiting list – Air Canada could continue to book profits from selling some of the planes and leasing them back.

Now, I’m not sure the terms of their lease, and the degree to which they’re actually coming out ahead here.

However, the point is that most airlines prefer a mix of owning and leasing planes, as a way of mitigating risk.

The decision isn’t that different from trying to decide whether to buy or lease a car. If you’re not sure how long you want to keep the car, it could make sense to lease it rather than buy it. Meanwhile if you know you’ll keep the car for a long time, you’re generally better off buying it. The same applies to airlines, except it’s much more complicated, given that we’re talking about a fleet of hundreds of planes, rather than a single car.

Leasing some planes gives Air Canada more flexibility. If there’s an economic downturn or the plane no longer makes sense for Air Canada, they can just return the plane when the contract is up. Nonetheless long term they’re paying a premium for the privilege of leasing (the leasing company has to make money somehow as well), which is why they continue to own many of their planes.

But the logic for why they’re selling now makes sense. If they have an asset, they might as well sell it when its value is the highest, which is exactly what they’re doing.

Also keep in mind that we’re starting to see a more robust used market for widebodies. With some airlines returning 777s after only a decade or so in service, there’s a great opportunity for airlines to get a deal on those used planes.

When you look at airlines’ fleets on airfleets.net, you’ll see all the planes they have leased listed under the “Remarks” section. You might just be surprised by how many planes airlines don’t actually own. For example, here’s a small part of American’s 737 fleet:

Leased-Planes

So while the Air Canada story is interesting, this is also a lot more common than most people realize.

(Tip of the hat to Cole)

Conversations (11)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Dave Guest

@BucK T - You're exactly right - the guys like Udvar-Hazy and GECAS are getting huge discounts. Unlike airlines, they're taking 100+ aircraft on a single order, which especially at the onset of a new program like the A320NEO, 737MAX or 787 is a big deal for the OEMs. If you're a bit nerd like me, you could parse their purchase prices by diving into the purchase commitment disclosures in their financial statements, as that would tell you their total cost for all aircraft on order.

0
‼ 0
Adil Guest

Air Canada has now joined the auctions market: http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/air-canada-upgrade-bid-flight-1.4019920

0
‼ 0
BucK T New Member

@Dan C - Aircraft lessors are some of the biggest direct customers for aircraft OEM. Pricing is never directly discussed in the open, but you can be certain that guys like Udvar-Hazy are getting significantly discounted purchase prices from Boeing and Airbus. In fact, I'd venture a guess that his acquisition costs on new metal are less than many major airlines out there.

0
‼ 0
Dan C. Guest

Per @Dave, leasing is often cheaper for airlines. The large aircraft leasing companies would love to buy direct from manufacturers but don't get access to the deep discounts airlines are offered when buying new (for many structural reasons). Long story short, airline buys at a discount and then turns around and negotiates a sale-lease back on favorable terms; assuming aircraft type remains desirable, aircraft leasing earns a healthy spread on the back-end by leasing to tier 2/3 airlines. Great business model with +40% IRR. And many private equity funds (Terra Firma, Oaktree) have done well backing aircraft leasing platforms

0
‼ 0
Gabriel New Member

I'm a Canadian accounting student and a reason I've learned as to why companies opt to engage in capital leases is that is affords off balance sheet financing. In essence they're able to have access to capital on assets that they own/need. It allows them to gain access to cash that normally they might have to go through a bank to get. And if a company already has a good amount of debt then it makes sense for them to leverage assets that they have already paid for. I wouldn't call it "'accounting shenanigans' to pad bonuses" because it it allowing a company to get access to cash that they would have needed anyway. So instead of taking a loan from a bank that might restrict their business abilities through covenants etc. and recording a huge liability, they're able to move an asset on the balance sheet to another asset position (capital lease). This is actually super super common in a lot of different businesses that require very expensive machinery. Construction companies do it with their large equipment, shipping companies with their equipment etc etc. It's actually very common with corporate planes as well.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published