Air Canada Makes Basic Fares More Restrictive, Cuts Carry-Ons

Air Canada has announced plans to make its basic economy fares more restrictive as of 2025, and it will have major implications for passengers.

Air Canada basic fares lose carry-ons, seat changes

Air Canada’s basic fares will have two new restrictions as of 2025. These changes apply specifically to flights within North America, as well as to flights to sun destinations, which include the Caribbean, Mexico, and Central America.

First of all, for tickets purchased as of January 3, 2025, these fares will no longer include a full size carry-on bag. Instead, passengers on these fares will only be able to bring a small personal item onboard at no extra cost.

Larger items will have to be checked before security, at the cost of $35 for the first bag and $50 for the second bag. Passengers arriving at the boarding gate with an ineligible carry-on item will be required to check the bag for a $65 fee.

Second of all, as of January 21, 2025, passenger traveling on basic fares will no longer be able to switch their seats from the one that’s automatically assigned to them at check-in.

Under the current policy, basic economy passengers are assigned a seat at check-in, but can then switch the seat at no cost. The new policy will require passengers to pay extra if they want a different seat than what they’re assigned.

The good news is that Aeroplan status members, Star Alliance Gold members, and Aeroplan premium credit card members, will be exempt from these policies, and will continue to be allowed to take a carry-on bag and select a seat.

Air Canada has new basic economy restrictions

Air Canada’s motivation for this policy change

Air Canada’s motivation for this policy fare is pretty simple — airlines offer basic fares and make them punitive with the goal of getting people to buy-up to a higher fare bundle. Airlines want to be able to market low fares, but also obviously want to get as much revenue from each passenger as possible.

Maybe someone sees a good Air Canada fare through an online travel agency, decides they want to book, but then determines that it makes sense to pay extra to avoid punitive restrictions. At least that’s the consumer psychology behind these fares.

But why is Air Canada making this change now, nearly seven years after having introduced basic fares? It kind of makes sense competitively:

  • WestJet recently made its basic economy fares more restrictive, even rebranding them as UltraBasic; they no longer include carry-on bags, or the ability to assign a seat of choice at check-in
  • Porter is growing at a fast pace with its Embraer E195-E2s, and the carrier’s basic fares also don’t include carry-ons, or the option of selecting a seat

Obviously Air Canada wants to be able to compete with its two biggest rivals in Canada. For that matter, Air Canada has a transborder joint venture with United, and United is the only one of the “big three” US carriers to not allow carry-ons with basic economy fares.

Competitively, I can see why Air Canada is making this change. Obviously this isn’t good for those who frequently book basic economy fares. Meanwhile I see some elite members happy about this change, in hopes that it will lead to more open overhead bin space, and speedier boarding.

Air Canada’s competitors have similar carry-on policies

Bottom line

As of early 2025, Air Canada is making basic fares more restrictive. The airline will no longer allow carry-on bags on these fares, and also won’t allow passengers to switch seats from the one they’re assigned at check-in without paying a fee. However, elite members and premium credit card members are excluded.

Air Canada simply seems to be catching up with the competition, as WestJet and Porter have the same policies, and joint venture partner United also has the same restrictions.

What do you make of Air Canada adding restrictions to its basic fares?

Conversations (17)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

CopperLady Guest

With these kinds of restrictions, I'd rather change planes and stay on a US carrier. Air Canada (and others) is shooting themselves in the foot.

0
‼ 0
Marco Guest

The new carry-on restriction for Basic Economy is an excellent move on the part of Air Canada, and will align the carrier not only with its domestic competitors, but also with alliance partner United Airlines. It is the last fraction of the overhead bin scrounge that delays flights, so this change should have a tangibly positive effect on orderly and timely departures on ACA flights going forward.

0
‼ 0
gideyup11 Gold

Aligning Basic Economy to Porter /WestJet / United is fine and dandy, but AC's standard economy fares is not competitive vs. UA and other US airlines. AC's standard economy fares charges for seat selection, and does NOT have free changes, cancel for travel credit. If UA/DL/AA/B6 can offer free seat selection and free change/cancel on their standard coach fare, why can't Air Canada??

0
‼ 0
Derek H Guest

Far from a shock from one of the worst airlines in the world. The government has protected them far too long, and they've become far too greedy. I can't recall the last thing Air Canada did right...genuinely.

0
‼ 0
bossa Guest

If AC was truly competitive from a consumer's point of view, they'd leave well enough alone & market these features as unique, compared to its competitors. These companies operate in virtual lock-step, monkey-see-monkey do and I don't even view them as truly 'competing' with one another in various aspects. But, then again, they aren't charities and their supreme obligation (above God & country) is to their share holders & board of directors, exclusively.... PS-Maybe this decision was a result of a survey/feedback from their 'most valued' Basic Economy pax !

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published