Qatar Airways Threatens Pilots For Taxiing With Two Engines

This isn’t of much consequence to passengers one way or another, though it sure is interesting to get an inside look into airline operations in this way…

Qatar Airways pilots aren’t following procedures

In late September, Qatar Airways‘ Chief Flight Operations Officer sent a rather scathing letter to pilots over their “gross deviation” from the company’s policy. Essentially Qatar Airways has a policy whereby pilots are supposed to taxi with just one engine on arrival (after landing). This is intended to save fuel, and therefore money.

While the Doha-based airline has been targeting a 95% compliance rate, it’s being found that in the past several months, the policy has only been followed 55% of the time.

So the airline is now going after pilots who don’t follow the procedure, going so far as to threaten dismissal from the company for non-compliance.

Here’s the memo to pilots:

“As the airline is going through unprecedented times due to the current crisis, I expect all of you as professionals to make all necessary measures to avoid unnecessary operational costs.

The background of this notice is to highlight that there has been gross deviations by some flight crew from the company’s mandated procedure to carry out SE (taxi in) from the start of the pandemic.

When we started this project a few years ago we had set a target of 95% compliance but it is quite disappointing to see that in the last 3 months we have only achieved an average of 55%.

SOPs are meant to be adhered to and I will not hesitate to take serious action against those who do not follow or deviate from this requirement intentionally without any valid reason.

I have given the instructions to all Fleet Managers that any unjustified non adherence to SE taxi procedures will result in pilots being placed on LOG and called to the fleet office for explanation if not mentioned in post flight report and if the explanation is found to be without valid reasons, a serious action will be taken against offenders including dismissal from the company.”

Qatar Airways pilots are supposed to taxi in on one engine

Here are my questions…

I know we have a lot of pilot readers here, so I’d love if someone could share some insights:

  • Why would pilots not follow the single engine taxi procedure? Is it simply that it’s easier to be able to use the power of both engines, or is there another reason?
  • The airline is targeting 95% compliance, suggesting that there are situations where it doesn’t make sense to use single engine taxi, so what would those situations be?
  • How can the company determine the compliance rate? Is this based on fuel burn, or some engine stats showing how long a particular engine was running, or…?
  • Given that pilots are trained to work off checklists and follow procedures, do pilots at other airlines similarly deviate from single engine taxi procedures, or should this make us question what other procedures aren’t being followed?


Qatar Airways’ taxiing procedure isn’t being followed 45% of the time

Bottom line

Qatar Airways is unhappy that pilots aren’t following procedures for taxiing on one engine. While the letter to pilots is very strongly worded, I suppose that’s fair enough — it’s something that should be possible, and that can save money while also being good for the environment.

This also has me wondering about taxiing procedures across the industry, and if other airlines with similar policies also have such problems with compliance.

Conversations (58)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Lionel pundyk New Member

Damn Right Bro! Despite the compensation. Not quite a good work environment, very poor management..besides that feels like your being watched all the time even when you're not at work. At home or when you go out shopping with your debit card they know what you buy what you eat what you drink. I was every other day at QDC my favorite shopping place. Anyways there's not much to do there... I'm glad your out bro... THERE'S A LIFE

0
‼ 0
helmut Guest

I've been a First Officer in Qatar until June2020 when the company terminated me because I was part of a whatsapp group, a group where we managed roster exchanges and some destination info in order to help each other, well, it seems absurd to believe but unfortunately true. Before being illegally terminated I was always complying with the RETI procedure (reduced engine taxi in), for about 80% of the flights except when we didn't have the requirements, it was and still is a standard practice and it actually works, what doesn't work is the management that threatens his pilots continuosly with all kinds of letters and inviting people to the office to shout at them for whatever reason.

0
‼ 0
Ross Aimer Guest

Captain “Tim“ who worked for QR said it best. (And l confirm his sentiments, because when l worked for Boeing, l trained a few QR 777 pilots.) None union airlines like QR operate on fear and intimidation of their crews and employees. And you have no protection against management’s heavy hands. That is why airlines like QR can never keep or attract enough well trained and experienced pilots!

0
‼ 0
Ross Aimer Guest

This is perhaps one of the most idiotic things I've heard in aviation! (Threatening your pilots with termination, because they don't feel safe taxiing on one engine.) Single engine taxi never works as it is advertised. Yes, you may save a few pounds of fuel, taxing on a smooth, flat and dry taxiway in a remote part of the airport. But often you burn away all those savings out of the tailpipe, waiting for a gate, the jetway driver or the ground power hookup! Not to mention, the much higher powers required to move the aircraft, sometimes inches at a time in a congested airport. Blowing objects and people behind, or vacuuming the sand covered taxiways of the Middle East aerodrome into your engine intake. Then there are those times when a short taxi after landing requires at least a two minute cool down. Plus the distractions from safely operating your aircraft. I think it is time to send that stupid Chief Pilot back riding a camel and writing SOP's for it! Captain Ross Aimer UAL ret. CEO, Aero Consulting Experts, Los Angeles

0
‼ 0
G cooke Guest

Manageroftheskies: You are the reason so pilots hate there jobs. Please tell me you don’t manage pilots for a living. You must be a “peach” to work for. Go manage your pets at home, we’ll all be better off

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published

Keep Exploring OMAAT