Fascinating Statistics About Qantas’ Longest Flight

In March 2018, Qantas launched daily nonstop flights between Perth and London using the Boeing 787-9. At the time this was the world’s second longest flight, at just over 9,000 miles (Qatar’s Auckland to Doha flight was slightly longer).

However, within a few months both routes lost their titles, as in late 2018 Singapore Airlines resumed nonstop flights between Singapore and Newark using the A350-900ULR.

Qantas is now celebrating the one year anniversary of their Perth to London route, and has some interesting facts to share.

I was skeptical of Qantas’ Perth to London flight

When Qantas launched their Perth to London flight, I was skeptical. Previously much of the market share between Australia and Europe belonged to the Gulf carriers, which offered convenient one stop service, as well as several Asian carriers, which offered efficient routings via their hubs.

I couldn’t fully rationalize the Perth to London flight:

  • A majority of the demand for travel between Australia and Europe comes from people in Eastern Australia (Melbourne, Sydney, etc.), so for those people they’d be connecting once either way, regardless of whether they go through Perth, Asia, or a Gulf hub
  • In economy I’d go out of my way to avoid one of the world’s longest flights, especially on a 787-9 with nine abreast seating
  • Generally many people flying from Australia to London are connecting beyond London, and in those cases you’re going to get a more direct routing on a Gulf carrier, since you could fly from a major Australian gateway to just about any major city in Europe with just one stop, rather than potentially having to double connect using this routing (i.e. Sydney to Dubai to Dublin vs. Sydney to Perth to London to Dublin)
  • At the same time, I imagined there would be quite a bit of initial demand, purely due to the interest in such a long flight, and also the nationalistic pride that exists around Qantas

Qantas’ Perth to London flight has been a success

Qantas has released quite a few statistics regarding the new route. Some are actually significant and noteworthy (the economic growth this has created, average load factors, where passengers are going, etc.), and are some are just fun (the seat that watched the most TV, how much wine people drank, etc.).

So let’s look at some of the statistics. Most significantly:

  • The flight had an average load factor of 94%, and has carried 155,000 passengers
  • 59% of passengers on the flight have been Australian, 31% British, and 7% from other parts of Europe (so that represents 97% of passengers)
  • When it comes to outbound passengers, 50% are originating in Perth, 25% are coming from Melbourne, 7% from Sydney, 6% from Brisbane, and 4% from Adelaide (so that represents 92% of passengers)
  • Qantas claims the route has created 601 jobs in Western Australia, visitor expenditure has been $101 million, and the route has created $100 million free publicity (personally I don’t put too much weight into this, since I tend to think some of this math is a bit fuzzy)

Anyway, that’s the serious stuff, but then there’s the fun stuff as well:

  • From Perth to London, the average flight time was 17hr1min, while the fastest flight time was 16hr19min; from London to Perth, the average flight time was 16hr5min, while the fastest flight time was 15hr15min
  • Seat 56F watched the most TV, by more than 100 hours compared to any other seat
  • 367,000 glasses of wine have been served in the first year, so that’s an average of 2.4 glasses of wine per person
  • White wine was most popular in economy, while red wine was most popular in premium economy and business class
  • 80% of eligible passengers are doing the stretching class in the Perth transit lounge yoga studio

Bottom line

Qantas has long been a pretty conservative airline, so it’s great to see that this more creative route has been such a success. Like I said, I was skeptical, but it seems like it has worked out well for them. I guess part of that is also that the 787-9 makes routes like this economical.

Of all of the above statistics, the one I find most surprising is how many passengers are allegedly using the yoga studio. 80%, really?!? Furthermore, I’m not surprised that one seat watched 100 more hours of TV than any other, but rather I’m surprised that this is something they are able to track.

Next up we’ll have to see the results of Qantas’ “Project Sunrise,” as the airline hopes to launch nonstop flights from Melbourne/Sydney to London/New York, once they can secure the right plane for that.

What do you make of the results from Qantas’ first year flying Perth to London? Are there any statistics that surprise you?

Conversations (43)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

platy Guest

@ Austline Per my post...the MEL-SIN services connect with the SYD-SIN-LHR service (QF metal). The loss in capacity MEL to LHR is 50%. The loss in capacity MEL plus SYD to LHR is 25%. The capacity from MEL-SIN matters not when anybody who wants to go to LHR on QF metal via SIN has only one A380 originating from SYD to ride...(and must also do an extra stop in SYD if they want to do the journey in First).

0
‼ 0
John Guest

"I don’t put too much weight into this, since I tend to think some of this math is a bit fuzzy" Spot on. Same hired companies doing economic analysis that okayed junk bonds. The highest satisfaction rating of any QANTAS economy flights is also puzzling. Methinks a lot of infrequent family reunion travellers and business travellers in economy able to claim QF points for the expensive travel. Now that Singapore has been returned as a QANTAS hub ~ its removal and the awful 737 QF metal to SIN sent Perth peeps to other airlines ~ my guess is in another year the real figures then may change.

0
‼ 0
The nice Paul Diamond

@ SullyofDoha I guess I'm believing Qantas' management when they tell us that this is now one of their most profitable routes. Seems difficult to argue with such a strong statement? Then again, I think accountants are all fantasists. I learned early in my career that "cash is a fact, everything else* is an opinion". * Including "profit"

0
‼ 0
SullyofDoha Gold

A number of you are taking about how 'successful the route has been! How do you really know? The plane is averaging a 94% capacity. So what? This is still no indication of the route's profitability! What was the average price of the ticket? What is the profit margin? Could this plane have been better utilized flying several shorter routes within the same 17 hour time frame? These were 'fun facts' with very little insight into whether the route bleeds money or makes money!

0
‼ 0
Tony New Member

I won’t disagree that QF does wine in J well, but I’m yet to speak to anyone who is happy with the current catering. It’s disgusting and the same menus repeat endlessly. If you’re happy with what QF is serving, SQ and QR will blow your mind!

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published