Wild: United CEO Scott Kirby Approached Delta About A Merger, But Was Rejected

A few months ago we learned how United CEO Scott Kirby had reportedly approached American CEO Robert Isom about the concept of a merger. American “rejected” this for obvious reasons, arguing there was no way this would get regulatory approval. Nonetheless, Kirby made his case publicly about how this would be good for consumers.

As it turns out, before Kirby approached Isom, he actually approached Delta CEO Ed Bastian about the concept of a merger between those two airlines.

The idea of a Delta & United merger was floated in 2025

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that last year, Kirby made a phone call to Bastian about the concept of a merger between United and Delta.

Delta leaders reportedly discussed the approach and merits of a potential deal as part of preliminary due diligence, and talks didn’t progress, as both companies moved on from the proposal. Then months later, Kirby tried the same thing with Isom.

Kirby’s ambition is to build one US mega carrier, and he has used a “trade deficit” argument to support this concept being good for consumers. The idea is that the US has more international service from foreign carriers than on local carriers, and the way to address that is to build an even more powerful airline.

Bastian, meanwhile, has been consistent in arguing that there shouldn’t be any consolidation between big US carriers, and that any consolidation would center around the smaller players.

In 2025, Delta and United accounted for 90% of the US airline industry profits. At the moment, United has a market cap of $38 billion, while Delta has a market cap of $56 billion. While there had long been talk of United possibly buying JetBlue, in recent times, Kirby has argued that the deal isn’t big enough to make sense.

United approached Delta with the concept of a merger

I’d love to know what’s going on in Kirby’s head

If United and Delta could get regulatory approval for a merger, of course they’d do so, since they’d dominate the market, and would have so much pricing power. The issue here is how one gets regulatory for such a deal, because it would unarguably be awful — like, truly, truly terrible — for competition.

Surely Kirby knows this, and my guess is that he just thinks that if there’s ever a chance that something like this would be allowed, it would be while President Trump is in office. Kirby has been doing everything he can to flatter Trump, and maybe it was all in anticipation of this “ask.” But even so, it’s just beyond reasonable.

As I explained when United floated the idea of buying American, one can’t possibly put into words how bad it would be for the competitive landscape if two of the “big three” carriers merged. But Kirby’s argument seems to be a combination of grasping at straws, and hoping to make people patriotic, or something:

  • Kirby basically acknowledges fares would go up (he has made it clear that even when oil prices go down, he hopes United can keep fares up and boost margins), but he’s saying fares don’t matter, but instead, value is what counts; people don’t want cheap tickets, they want a nice experience!
  • This concept of creating a competitive airline globally is what would be worst for competition, since it would essentially destroy the balance of joint ventures, which is what keeps long haul airfare competitive (it’s useful to have three sets of these, one with each of the “big three” alliances)
  • Then there’s just talk of the US economy in general, and this is where it gets the most ridiculous; Kirby talks about how the combined airline will have lots of union jobs, will strengthen US aircraft manufacturing, etc. (that’s already happening, and for that matter, United has also been ordering hundreds of Airbus planes)

I was hoping that Kirby’s argument in favor of such a deal would be a bit more sophisticated, but it really isn’t. It’s essentially just somewhere between trying to call in favors to Trump, and trying to pose as being patriotic. The idea is to completely overlook concerns about domestic competition by making this all about international service.

Kirby’s argument in favor of a mega merger is weak

Bottom line

We recently learned how United CEO Scott Kirby came up with the idea of buying American. Even before that, though, he reportedly approached Delta about such a deal, but was quickly rejected. Kirby’s proposal to build a mega US carrier would be great for investors, and no one else.

I have to assume that Kirby knows this, and is just trying to convince himself otherwise. The timing here also isn’t a coincidence, because clearly he believes he has a “once in a lifetime” opportunity to make this happen, while Trump is in office. But even Trump wouldn’t do this to the American people… right?

What do you make of Kirby’s proposal for United and Delta to merge?

Conversations (62)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Fed UP Guest

International carriers provide more international service... thats because, if you have a choice, why would you fly a shitty US airplane internationally. Most INTL carriers are way better across the board (most). There are some Americans (who are clueless) think the US Airlines are safer but not when you compare them to most European and Asian airlines. Any mega merger would make the cost of flying go way up and the service levels would take a further decline.

1
‼ 0
BjornFree Guest

United has publicized its desire to merge with American and now Delta. They are making noise with going public about giant mergers. Then when JetBlue reconfigures their fleet and declares bankruptcy they will “settle” for buying JetBlue. The gov will approve the merger. Delta and Americans leverage in stopping the merger will be lessened due to these announcements.

0
‼ 0
Marcus Guest

American needs to merge with Alaska

0
‼ 0
Jordan Diamond

The moment Spirit left, fares have doubled, with little to no last minute decent fares. Spirit kept the US3 in check. Yes, Frontier is the bottom feeding airline now, but even its rates have increased... Everyone loved to hate on Spirit (without ever flying them) - they were very nice once you tried them. Well, you all got what you wanted. HIGHER FARES!! Imagine what will happen when two of the US3 merge.

0
‼ 0
betterbub Diamond

I guess the middle section of the Venn diagram between team sports fans and avgeeks isn't necessarily the largest, but sports teams will just call any other team to see if they can float a trade even if the possibility is zero. And for a car dealer metaphor, you should entertain the people who say they're just there to kick tires because you never know the percentage of them that will turn into actual buying customers

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published