United Airlines Resumes Los Angeles To Shanghai Flights

After an over four year hiatus, United Airlines is resuming service between Los Angeles (LAX) and Shanghai (PVG). This also makes United the only US carrier to fly nonstop between Los Angeles and Mainland China.

United resumes LAX to PVG flights with 787

As of August 29, 2024, United Airlines has resumed flights between Los Angeles and Shanghai. Specifically, the route operates with the following schedule:

UA198 Los Angeles to Shanghai departing 12:55PM arriving 5:45PM (+1 day)
UA199 Shanghai to Los Angeles departing 8:10PM arriving 4:55PM

The 6,485-mile flight is operated by a Boeing 787-9, and is blocked at 13hr50min westbound and 11hr45min eastbound. The service is initially operating 4x weekly, though as of the winter schedule (starting in late October 2024), it should increase to daily.

For context on this route resumption:

  • The only other carrier flying this route nonstop is China Eastern, and the airline has a daily service with a Boeing 777-300ER
  • United otherwise flies to Shanghai out of San Francisco (SFO)
  • American and Delta also used to operate this route; American cut this service as part of its general reduction of long haul service out of Los Angeles, while Delta recently axed plans to resume this route

You would think there would be a lot of demand for a Los Angeles to Shanghai route, but it’s not as easy as it sounds, on both sides of the Pacific. For one, China demand just hasn’t recovered post-pandemic, and service continues to be a small fraction of what it once was, due to China’s weakening economy, plus the general hostility between the United States and China.

Furthermore, Los Angeles is a surprisingly tough long haul gateway. Each of the “big three” US carriers has at one point or another tried a big long haul push out of the airport, but hasn’t had much luck. It’s just a very competitive market, and it’s hard for any one airline to grow a market dominant position, both due to the economics, and due to the challenges with getting gate space.

United has resumed Los Angeles to Shanghai flights

United’s network at LAX is fairly impressive

Los Angeles is a market where all of the “big three” US carriers have a significant network, yet no airline is really the leader. We’ve seen all three US carriers try their hand at expanding service there, with limited success. However, as we look at how things have evolved, United is definitely pulling ahead at the airport when it comes to the number of long haul international destinations.

United’s long haul international destinations out of Los Angeles include Hong Kong (HKG), London (LHR), Melbourne (MEL), Shanghai (PVG), Sydney (SYD), and Tokyo (HND & NRT), all on a year-round basis. United has also been flying from Los Angeles to Auckland (AKL) and Brisbane (BNE), on a seasonal basis, though those routes are being discontinued.

How does this compare to other airlines?

  • American’s long haul international destinations out of Los Angeles include London (LHR), Sydney (SYD), and Tokyo (HND), on a year-round basis, as well as Auckland (AKL) on a seasonal basis
  • Delta’s long haul international destinations out of Los Angeles include Paris (CDG), Sydney (SYD), and Tokyo (HND), on a year-round basis, as well as Auckland (AKL), Brisbane (BNE), and Tahiti (PPT), on a seasonal basis

I’m curious to see which direction capacity moves for all three carriers in Los Angeles. They always try something new, the question is just for how long it lasts…

United has an impressive network out of Los Angeles

Bottom line

United Airlines has resumed its route between Los Angeles and Shanghai, after a suspension of over four years. With this, United is the only US airline to fly from Southern California to Mainland China. This is a route that all of the “big three” US carriers operated pre-pandemic, so it’s nice to see at least one airline resume this route.

What do you make of United resuming its Los Angeles to Shanghai service?

Conversations (46)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

iamhere Guest

The demand is still there. Flights continue to be full between the US and China and prices have not come down much, not near what it used to be pre-pandemic. Delta does operate via China Eastern. Los Angeles is served by several airlines from other Chinese cities too, so I think this is a factor, as well.

0
‼ 0
Tim Dunn Diamond

since Ben likes page clicks and this article has dramatically lagged the DL article in page clicks, I will copy part of the comment I made below scuttlebutt is that UA is working on a deal for a dozen or so used 777-300ERs to take the place of the 787s which Boeing can't deliver - and also because they realize that the 777-200 fleet is getting very long in the tooth. DL will receive 2 dozen new Airbus widebodies in 2024 and 2025 and then the A350-1000s start arriving and then the 20 widebody options which are likely to include at least some additional A350-1000s. In other words, DL has an enormous amount of longhaul widebody capacity coming and you and anyone else is sorely mistaken if you think DL will be using those aircraft to predominantly fly to AMS and CDG. add on to aircraft, UA made enormous strategic errors in passing on the A350 and not ordering a new generation large widebody. They put their confidence in Boeing that can't deliver. UA will use 260 seat 787s or fuel consuming 777s and will have to pull even more seats off of the 787-9 in order to fly routes that DL can easily fly with A350-900s and -1000s with dozens more seats per flight. UA like AA bet on Tokyo as a connecting hub and the split Tokyo airport hubs has destroyed Tokyo's role as an economically viable connecting hub to Asia. Meanwhile, KE says it will receive a decision about its merger with Asiana from the US DOJ which will unlock much more growth not just for KE but also for DL. With China and HKG far behind what they used to be, ICN is THE leading transpacific hub in NE Asia and that position will only grow stronger. and most of all, they mistook DL's measured Pacific restructuring as a lack of interest in the region. UA was wrong on every count. DL is growing the Pacific and will keep doing it much more profitably and with much more capable aircraft to and from better hubs that can fly from all of the US to all of Asia. Do you suppose that UA is seeing DL getting closer and closer across the Pacific and is now doing anything possible to hold onto UA's Pacific position - and will have messed up configurations just like DL has with the ex-Latam A350-900s - which will be corrected this winter - but will be acquiring the most fuel INEFFICIENT aircraft in the US carrier passenger fleet with the 777-300ER? the Pacific will be very interesting over the next few years. LAX-PVG will be the least of the stories that are told about AA, DL and UA

0
‼ 0
Tim Dumb Guest

Remember when Delta said they were going to fly LAX-PVG and then pulled out? Pepperidge Farms remembers

1
‼ 0
pez Member

My only trip from LAX to Shanghai was part of a cheap business class ticket to Phuket, on China Eastern, around 5 years ago. We coupled that with a Malaysian Airlines round trip from Phuket to Melbourne for Christmas. For a while we were looking at Chinese carriers to get us to Australia cheaply in business class, but those opportunities haven't happened post-pandemic, unfortunately. China Eastern's service was great while in the air. Everything else, not so much... a bit wacky. Managed an unplanned 24-hour tour of Shanghai as a result.

0
‼ 0
Extraordinary1 Gold

I think there is absolutely the demand for more flights on this route. China Eastern has been consistently commanding load factors at or above 90% since it restarted LAX-PVG.

2
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published