Royal Air Maroc’s Bouncy, Aborted Landing

Royal Air Maroc’s Bouncy, Aborted Landing

8

Yowzers, this looks like one of the more unpleasant aborted landings I’ve ever seen…

Royal Air Maroc’s Valencia aborted landing

This incident happened on Saturday, November 4, 2023, and involves Royal Air Maroc flight AT968 from Casablanca (CMN) to Valencia (VLC). The planned 578-mile flight was operated by an ATR 72-600 with the registration code CN-COE.

The first two hours of the flight — up to the approach to Valencia Airport — were routine, until the aircraft came in to land on runway 30 at the airport. It was a gusty day in Valencia, with winds at 17 knots, gusting to 28 knots.

Below is a video of what one of the aborted landings at the airport looked like. As you can see, the plane touched down with its nose gear first at least three times, with quite a bit of bounce. At that point the decision was made to abort the landing, as you’d expect. I don’t remember the last time I’ve seen a video of a commercial aircraft bouncing quite like that. I can only imagine what that must have felt like in the cabin.

The Royal Air Maroc plane then diverted to Alicante

The Royal Air Maroc ATR-72-600 attempted two landings at Valencia Airport, before the decision was made to divert.

Royal Air Maroc’s two go arounds at Valencia Airport

The plane ended up diverting to Alicante (ALC), located 83 miles away. Conditions there were better, so the plane managed to safely touch down there on its first try, just over three hours after departing from Casablanca.

Royal Air Maroc diverted to Alicante

What’s interesting is that after diverting to Alicante, the plane actually flew back to Casablanca, in a flight time of around 2.5 hours. The plane was back in Casablanca roughly eight hours after it initially departed the airport.

Royal Air Maroc returned from Alicante to Casablanca

It’s not clear to me if passengers were sent to Valencia via alternate means of transportation, or if the decision was just made to refuel, return everyone to Casablanca, and start all over the next day. Regardless, it was a pretty eventful journey for everyone involved.

It’s also interesting how the aircraft didn’t appear to be taken out of service for any amount of time. Maybe turboprops are just that sturdy, but does an aborted landing like that not warrant a thorough inspection?

Bottom line

A Royal Air Maroc ATR-72-600 had a pretty dramatic approach to Valencia Airport over the weekend, due to strong winds. During one of the aborted landings, the plane’s nose gear touched down three times before the main gear. After that incident, the decision was made to divert. The plane flew to Alicante, before returning to Casablanca.

What do you make of this Royal Air Maroc aborted landing?

Conversations (8)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Barry West Guest

    I think an acceptance by the aircrew to divert was the best option rather than trying to force the landing and possibly turn the aircraft and passengers into a smoking pile of rubbish on the runway.

  2. Adrian Guest

    Based on my experience with Air Maroc, they probably had to find and pay their own way back to Valencia.

  3. Capt ET Guest

    Whoever was flying that aircraft should not be flying passengers.

  4. Darryl Stewart Guest

    Surprising to see this. Many Royal Air Maroc Captains are actually officers in the Maroc Air Force.

    1. Dan77W Guest

      They don’t get stuck at RAM Express which is a wholly owned subsidiary

    2. Eskimo Guest

      'Wholly-owned subsidary refers to an organization that has 100% of its shares owned by another company' (Source: Merriem-Watson Dictionary), so basically how can they be "stuck" there if it is in fact the same company?

  5. Samo Guest

    I've had a single bounce on Loganair's ATR at LHR this summer and that was already bad enough. Three bounces would definitely be quite scary.

  6. Sam G Guest

    From the flight numbers it looks like offloaded at Alicante and positioned back to Casablanca. Bit of a niche route but I'd guess most passengers onboard live in Spain and would much rather prefer to make their own way home if necessary (which I doubt was - Alicante airport in off season would seem like a pretty easy place for a handling agent to come up with a coach!) than be carted all the way back to Morocco - especially after that experience!!

Featured Comments Most helpful comments ( as chosen by the OMAAT community ).

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Barry West Guest

I think an acceptance by the aircrew to divert was the best option rather than trying to force the landing and possibly turn the aircraft and passengers into a smoking pile of rubbish on the runway.

0
Adrian Guest

Based on my experience with Air Maroc, they probably had to find and pay their own way back to Valencia.

0
Eskimo Guest

'Wholly-owned subsidary refers to an organization that has 100% of its shares owned by another company' (Source: Merriem-Watson Dictionary), so basically how can they be "stuck" there if it is in fact the same company?

0
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,163,247 Miles Traveled

32,614,600 Words Written

35,045 Posts Published