Qantas Faces Unprecedented Fine For Canceling Flights, Still Selling Tickets

Qantas could be facing a fine of hundreds of millions of dollars for a practice that it engaged in on a widespread basis last year…

Australian regulator comes after Qantas’ canceled flight tactics

The Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (ACCC) has just launched an action alleging that Qantas has engaged in false, misleading, or deceptive conduct. The airline is accused of selling tickets on flights that it had already canceled in order to generate more revenue.

The ACCC claims that for more than 8,000 flights scheduled to depart between May and July 2022, Qantas kept selling tickets on its website for an average of more than two weeks, and in some cases for up to 47 days, after canceling flights.

On top of that, for more than 10,000 flights scheduled to depart between May and July 2022, Qantas did not notify existing ticket holders that their flights had been canceled for an average of 18 days, and in some cases for up to 48 days.

For a sense of just how widespread these issues were, roughly 25% of Qantas’ total network was canceled over that period, and these issues impacted 70% of those cancelations. In other words, for about 18% of Qantas’ total flights, the airline either continued to sell tickets for two or more days, or delayed informing existing ticket holders that their flights have been canceled for two or more days.

Here are a couple of examples that are provided:

  • For the May 6, 2022, flight QF93 from Melbourne to Los Angeles, passengers were notified of the cancelation two days before departure; one consumer was provided a replacement flight a day before their original departure date, which was communicated only through the Qantas app, leading to $600 AUD in out of pocket expenses
  • For the July 29, 2022, flight QF73 from Sydney to San Francisco, Qantas sold 21 tickets after it had canceled the flight, with the last ticket being sold 40 days after the cancelation

Here’s how ACCC Chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb said describes this:

“The ACCC has conducted a detailed investigation into Qantas’ flight cancellation practices. As a result, we have commenced these proceedings alleging that Qantas continued selling tickets for thousands of cancelled flights, likely affecting the travel plans of tens of thousands of people.”

“We allege that Qantas’ conduct in continuing to sell tickets to cancelled flights, and not updating ticketholders about cancelled flights, left customers with less time to make alternative arrangements and may have led to them paying higher prices to fly at a particular time not knowing that flight had already been cancelled.”

“There are vast distances between Australia’s major cities. Reliable air travel is essential for many consumers in Australia who are seeking to visit loved ones, take holidays, grow their businesses or connect with colleagues. Cancelled flights can result in significant financial, logistical and emotional impacts for consumers.”

Qantas sold seats on canceled flights

Regulator seeking massive penalties for Qantas

Okay, you might think the regulator is just trying to fine Qantas some small token amount, as we often see against airlines, but that’s not the case here. Instead, the ACCC has asked a court to fine Qantas “hundreds of millions” of dollars. As the ACCC Chair describes this:

“We are going to seek a penalty that will underline that this is not just to be a cost of doing business, it is to deter conduct of this nature.”

The ACCC wants to fine Qantas “significantly more than” the $125 million AUD fine that automaker Volkswagen was charged in 2019, for violating Australian consumer laws.

Under Australian law, the maximum penalties for a breach of Australian consumer law is the greater of $10 million AUD, three times the total benefits that have been obtained or are reasonably attributable, or 10% of the corporation’s annual turnover.

Qantas’ annual turnover was $19.8 billion AUD during the financial year, so the potential fine here is huge.

Qantas could be fined hundreds of millions

My take on this action against Qantas

Qantas’ reputation in Australia has taken a nosedive since the start of the pandemic. While there are aspects of Qantas that are great, I’ve never had much respect for the company’s senior management.

CEO Alan Joyce has for years run the airline in the most cutthroat and greedy way imaginable, with little regard for employees or customers. While I understand he’s running a publicly traded, for-profit company, that doesn’t excuse the level of disregard he has shown for others.

So along those lines, I imagine part of the reason the ACCC is coming after Qantas so hard is because politically it’s popular to go after Qantas right now.

As far as the substance of the action goes, I’m happy to see an airline being held accountable for these kinds of practices. Unfortunately, though, they’re common among so many airlines, so I’m not sure Qantas is necessarily much worse than competitors here, other than the quantity of flights it canceled in mid-2022.

It is indeed outrageous how poorly airlines sometimes communicate flight cancelations, and also how they announce that they’ll cancel a flight, but then continue to sell tickets. If Qantas does face a huge fine, hopefully it starts the process of airlines being a bit more accountable on this front in the future.

Qantas isn’t very well liked in Australia right now

Bottom line

Australian regulators are looking at levying a huge fine against Qantas, for how the carrier handled flight cancelations. This not only involves selling tickets on flights that had already been canceled, but also not informing customers of flight cancelations even weeks after intentions to cancel a flight were known.

Regulators are really trying to make an example of Qantas here, and could fine the airline hundreds of millions of dollars. The reality is that Qantas is hardly on its own when it comes to acting this way, though accountability has to start somewhere. I’m curious to see what comes of this case.

What do you make of the ACCC going after Qantas?

Conversations (49)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

RF Diamond

Make them hurt with the maximum fine. Take them for all they got.

0
‼ 0
Lasloy Guest

Good to see the trolls out and spreading their mis-information. In Australian over 30,000 businesses and 2 million individuals received COVID payments. Unless they all need to pay it all back, then why single out Qantas, because after three years of heavy losses, they are now making money... Virgin Australia received $400 million from the Government as their Private Equity Owners were selling and cashing in most of their fleet. (A330's/777's). On the ACCC matter - I actively search for cheaper flights (early mornings) on their schedule that I hope will be cancelled - because then I can opt for a flight that was more expensive, and at a time when I actually wanted to fly, saving me money. You can only apply damages when the situation has left consumers out-of-pocket, and in most (and I would say all) situations the airline hasn't been able to generate income through this style of booking management (which most airlines do). On the Qatar landing rights - no one flies to Qatar, and hence when it came to negotations the Government is expected to get a benefit for its own airlines. Qatar has nothing to offer in reciprication for expanded access. We already have open skiies with the US and over 30 international airlines that fly into most of the major airports so 21 extra flights for an airline whose MD is on the record as saying a woman couldn't run Qatar because they are 'too emotional'. Be careful about who you jump into bed with. Al Baker is a nut job.

0
‼ 0
Mike Guest

Qantas is currently one of the most despised brands in Australia, and Luck, you're spot on in your assessment of Joyce's contribution to this. It is almost a national sports now to complain about Qantas, and in my mind, those complaints are almost always right. The fact that they are only launching this now, when Joyce is about to leave his post, is just another manifestation of the boys club culture. I'd normally feel for Vanessa Hudson who is taking over this basket-case, but she had a big contribution to the current state of the business. I have just returned from Asia, flying the national carrier of that country, rather than Qantas. It was my first time with them and I did not know what to expect - work booked the tickets as they were 30% cheaper than the Qantas alternative. The flight was superior to Qantas in every single aspect, most noticeably its ability to depart and arrive on time and the service by the charming team. Like many Australians, this is probably my year to expand my airline choices.

0
‼ 0
Sydneyflyer12 Guest

Nothing will change until people like Alan Joyce face jail time

0
‼ 0
Mark Guest

Qantas cancelled a flight on me , I eventually got through to them and asked what my pptions were . They told me as I missed the second flight they class me as a no show , and I need to make alternate arrangements myself . BTW I was travelling business (just for info). Overall it is hard to recognise that 15 years ago this was amongst the worlds best airlines , staff still try but management sabotage the staffs efforts to provide good service at every opportunity. Qantaslink (the regional arm) was the last standout still providing excellent service , but I see they have recently have got rid of the management who still had this service mindset. Its rather sad to see what was an excellent airline being destroyed by toxic directors & executives , these people have no shame .

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published