Lufthansa Claims It’s So Unprofitable That It Can’t Afford New Planes

I’m not sure this negotiating tactic is quite the flex that Lufthansa management thinks that it is, but goodness, it sure makes for an interesting topic…

Lufthansa is trying to prove how unprofitable it is

Lufthansa is the flagship airline of Lufthansa Group, and the company continues to be profitable. When financial results of the airline group are revealed, exact details of the breakdown in financial performance between subsidiaries is often limited. In other words, how is Lufthansa doing vs. SWISS, Austrian, Brussels, Eurowings, etc.?

At the moment, Lufthansa is in contentious negotiations with its pilots over pensions, and a possible strike is looming. Along those lines, aeroTELEGRAPH reports on how Lufthansa management is using its poor financial performance in these negotiations, in order to justify not giving in to demands of pilots.

While Lufthansa Group reported a €149 million profit for the first half of 2025, the company claims that Lufthansa is dragging the company down significantly. Lufthansa CEO Jens Ritter claimed that the core Lufthansa brand lost €274 million in the first half of 2025, while the entire Lufthansa division (including CityLine, City Airlines, Discover, and Air Dolomiti), recorded a loss of €307 million over that period.

Ritter also stated that “without structural changes, there will be no prospects for Lufthansa Airlines.” Lufthansa has dozens of new long haul jets expected to be delivered in the coming years, and he claimed that “we cannot afford that at the moment.”

When questions came up as to whether accounting was being manipulated to make Lufthansa’s situation look worse, Ritter stated that “no one would gain an advantage by portraying Lufthansa Classic negatively,” and that “on the contrary, we are the core of the group, the largest and most important airline.”

Meanwhile Lufthansa Group CEO Carsten Spohr indicated that Lufthansa’s cost disadvantage is so great that there’s no growth taking place there — “if Lufthansa Airlines doesn’t work, we won’t be able to save it with the Billionaires Club or with ITA or Swiss” (“Billionaires Club” refers to Eurowings, Lufthansa Cargo, and Lufthansa Technik, which generate around €1 billion in profits).

Lufthansa is supremely unprofitable, according to management

Is this the flex that Lufthansa management thinks it is?

Okay, so where do we even begin here? Of course management’s strategy in negotiating with unions is nothing new here — “we’re poor, we can’t afford these additional labor costs.” Fair enough.

However, the core of what they’re saying is true — Lufthansa Group is making money, but the carrier’s flagship airline is losing a significant amount of money. Admittedly there are a lot of factors in recent years that have been incredibly challenging for Lufthansa:

There are some areas where I feel bad for Lufthansa management, because the company couldn’t have predicted that the 777X would be the mess that it has been. At the same time, there are plenty of things within management’s control, like the absurd decision to introduce Allegris, which is insanely complex, while still being sort of average.

Like, the carrier’s new business class product is from three different seating manufacturers, a weight needs to be installed on SWISS A330s to balance out the weight of first class, Lufthansa 747-8s will be equipped with two different kinds of business class seats, etc.

More fundamentally, Lufthansa’s issue is that it’s a shell of its former self. Back in the day, Lufthansa was known for being one of Europe’s highest quality and most reliable airlines. However, look at the state of the fleet now. I mean, a vast majority of the carrier’s long haul business class fleet doesn’t have direct aisle access, and the airline is flying outdated aircraft, mostly.

Beyond that, Lufthansa’s focus in recent years has been on everything except the core business. Spohr’s specialty is figuring out any way possible to create new subsidiaries in order to minimize labor costs. I understand the challenging economics of European labor agreements, but of course the core airline won’t be successful if this is how it’s approached.

It’s just such a contrast to look at the glow-up that Air France has seen in recent years, where we’ve seen massive improvements in the passenger experience, efficiency, etc., and to compare that to the lack of progress at Lufthansa.

So it’s mighty convenient for Lufthansa management to now say “well we can’t afford these increased pensions because we’re not making money,” when the core of those losses seem to be due to mismanagement, over anything else. Last I checked, Lufthansa’s top executives are still in their roles, and are still getting paid pretty nicely despite Lufthansa’s lack of performance.

Lufthansa has gone from high quality to uncompetitive

Bottom line

Lufthansa is in contentious negotiations with its pilots over pensions. Management’s defense is that Lufthansa is so unprofitable that it can’t possibly afford to increase pensions, and for that matter, can’t even afford the new planes it has on order.

While the airline business is incredibly difficult, it sure seems to me like so many of Lufthansa’s issues are self-induced. Yet there has been no accountability for management. What has long amazed me about Lufthansa Group management (and in particular, Spohr) is how they talk about Lufthansa Group’s issues almost as if they’re independent, third party observers, and that nothing is within their control.

As someone who has been flying Lufthansa all my life, what stands out to me is how little the airline has evolved. It’s quite a contrast to carriers like Air France and even *gasp* British Airways.

What do you make of this Lufthansa profitability issue?

Conversations (54)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

SN Guest

Im not from germany but Ive lived there, and have a host family for 30+ years now whom owns a manufacturing company. So, I feel I can try and make a somewhat informed guess? Over the years I have noticed that the large heavyweight German companies, (think transport, auto, etc) have a kind of special place in their culture that we americans don’t really experience. I see they have a lot of social and economic responsibility to keep providing reliable income to their economy, and I think the government feels quite dependent on these companies doing so. At the same time, german culture wants strong labor rights, and rules. they have rules for rules and then a rule book for the rules (according to my german “family”). I say all of the above because that is the reality the company must deal with, and I wonder how much a new CEO could really change at Lufthansa?? - your stuck with your contracts (labor) - your stuck with your obligations to keep all of your various inefficient logistics and outposts and such across the country due to political considerations - You’re stuck with a culture that doesn’t want quick change. someone mentioned in their comment why on earth does LH have so many different airplane types instead of all 777. Well, when you add in a little govt pressure to support Airbus, and then some strong labor rules to ensure mechanics for every other type of plane has a job in germany (just guessing on this one to make the point) … then maybe you get stuck in the position of not being able to make such an efficient change without disrupting many local economies and pissing of the govt, and citizens… Germans value social and economic stability with strong labor and environment weaved in. It’s not exactly a mandate to innovate or disrupt.. So, Ben (or any one from Germany?!!), do you think a new CEO could actually change that much at Lufthansa???

0
‼ 0
Mangiafica Guest

Is the CEO's wife going to face justice for the babysitter she killed in Sardegna? She tried to flee the scene

0
‼ 0
Anthony Guest

Lufthansa was a pleasure to fly, for me that was before 2005. Their management could not handle international travellers complaints and treated customers with arrogance and school teacher strictness and that was 2010. Lufthansa is/was very over confident. They bought over airlines, Swiss being a huge mistake. Don't know why all that money in Switzerland could not buy Swiss, and let the Germans buy it. Lufthansa is an airline that will not be missed. To get out of this mess, they need international management, not German. Its the idea, the thinking to change the airline.

0
‼ 0
ed lewis Guest

Some of this has got to be related to weak decision making in the C suites. You don't suddenly become unprofitable. Scooping up all these subsidiary carriers cannot be free, perhaps it diverts managements attention too often. The unions are going to get their pensions, loss making or not. Make a deal and move on.

0
‼ 0
AeroB13a Diamond

A simple question for Ben, after reading the comments below, has your opinion of LH changed in any way?

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published