FAA Orders Flight Cuts At Chicago O’Hare: Impact On American & United Battle?

Several weeks ago, we learned about how the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) planned to force flight cuts at Chicago O’Hare Airport (ORD), given the extent to which airlines are trying to grow there, and the impact that will have on congestion.

There’s now a major update, as the FAA has finalized just how many flights will have to be cut. This is going to have some major impacts on the battle we’re currently seeing at Chicago O’Hare Airport (ORD), between American and United….

Chicago O’Hare flights will be reduced by 12% this summer

Recently, we’ve seen both American and United add a lot of capacity in Chicago, and this is part of a battle between the two companies. Both airlines have a hub in Chicago, but United has taken the lead (by far) in recent years, and now American is trying to regain some market share. So in reality, we’re just seeing a lot of capacity dumping in Chicago over the coming months (and a lot of smack talk!).

In light of all of this, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has just finalized an order to force schedule reductions at Chicago O’Hare, which will apply for much of the the IATA summer 2026 season (which goes from late March until late October).

To what extent should we expect flight cuts? Going back a couple of months, there were 3,080 planned peak day operations at the airport in summer, compared to 2,680 peak day operations during the same period in 2025. The FAA believes that this “increase is significant and would stress the runway, terminal, and air traffic control systems at the airport.”

So the FAA has now finalized an order, which will go into effect for flights between May 17 and October 24, 2026. With this, we’ll see 2,708 daily peak day operations be the cap for the airport. That represents a roughly 12% capacity reduction compared to what was initially planned, so expect lots of flights to be cut, primarily impacting American and United.

Operations will be allocated to air carriers in proportion based on their share of operations from last summer. Even last summer didn’t go smoothly at the airport, with a massive number of delays.

The idea is that the FAA will issue limitations to airlines in 30-minute increments. These half-hour limitations will range from 30 operations per half-hour during low demand periods, to 84 operations per half-hour at peak periods. Why the inconsistency? ATC staffing requirements and runway configuration changes require there to be certain “valleys,” for a period to safely transition throughout a day.

With the current price of jet fuel, I can’t help but wonder if airlines may have been forced to cut some capacity on their own, but I guess this settles it…

The FAA has ordered flights at O’Hare to be cut

Is this good news for American and/or United?

The whole reason that American and United are now battling so fiercely in Chicago is because of the airport’s gate allocation process. Airlines are allocated gates in the future based on historical usage, so both airlines have been trying to flood the market, so that they don’t lose market share to the other airline.

In theory, this battle between the two airlines is good for consumers, in terms of added capacity leading to lower fares. However, what would’ve been significantly less pleasant is the impact to on-time performance at the airport. Chicago O’Hare can be a bit of a mess on a good day (especially in terms of taxiway congestion), and with such an increase in service, it was going to get bad.

So, is this update good or bad news for American and United? I suppose it depends how you look at it. In some ways, it’s good for both American and United, since odds are that this incremental flying was going to be extremely unprofitable, so it’s helpful that they’re being forced to decrease service.

Now, if airlines could fly their full, planned Chicago schedules, I think it would’ve been worse for American than United. While both airlines would’ve likely lost money on this flying, American is in a much worse position, and it would’ve made a weak competitor even weaker.

I suppose with route cuts being proportionate to 2025 flying, this basically leaves both airlines in the same position they were in before this whole battle started, meaning neither airlines is growing market share relative to their competitor.

American & United are probably happy about this

Bottom line

The FAA has finalized its plans to restrict flights at Chicago O’Hare Airport over the coming summer months, given the amount of capacity that we’ve seen added in recent times, by both American and United. While the airport was initially supposed to see 3,080 daily peak day departures, that cap has been lowered by 12%, to 2,708 daily peak day departures.

Given the gate allocation process in Chicago, this leaves the competitive dynamics in Chicago pretty unchanged.

What do you make of the FAA’s decision to cut flights in Chicago?


Conversations (23)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

rebel Diamond

Using July 2025 as the baseline certainly favors AA, but quality of the networks along with higher fuel prices bodes relatively well for UA. Taxiing around ORD, it is amazing how many AE E175s and how few wide bodies AA uses. UA's operation uses significantly higher gauge (+27 seats/departure) and by all accounts is far more profitable. UA knew the FAA would not allow all the proposed growth and they are quite nimble in reallocating lift. It will be interesting to see how the battle for ORD market share plays out going forward.

1
‼ 0
Tim Dunn Diamond

United clearly is the biggest loser since the plan allows very slight growth over last year; AA proposed the lowest amount of growth this summer so the ratio of flights between AA and UA will be locked in for 2026 and perhaps into the future. This is evidence of yet another failed UA strategic plan and now marks the third UA hub where the FAA has had to step in to prevent overscheduling. Of course, AA and UA have already committed to the resources that were needed to plan to operate their full schedules but it is too late to reschedule those resources into new markets; the window for finalizing schedules for June has already closed at most airlines. UA esp. but also AA will pay for employees and planes that they cannot operate. Of course, alot of this extra capacity could not have been operated profitably at fuel costs before the Iran war but even more so they will lose money now - so they are happy to see some flights cancelled but it will still cost both airlines but UA the most. anecdotally, I had two friends fly on UA coded RJ flights connecting through ORD this week and both had their first flight of their itinerary delayed or cancelled to the point they were both delayed by a day. There were multiple delays and cancellations in the same market on UA regional carriers that day and there were no ATC or weather issues at ORD all day. All UA does to improve its operational integrity won't matter if its regional jet flights perform poorly - because the DOT considers any domestic flights w/ a carrier's marketing code part of that airline's network for on-time and cancellation purposes.

0
‼ 0
Maryland Guest

Ironic they're ending up at the same amount as last year.

0
‼ 0
Matthew Guest

Well now that Kirby’s D-CK measuring contest is being cancelled maybe we can avoid 45 minutes taxiing to gates and extra waiting that was going to result. These airlines are obtuse

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published