In March 2024, American Airlines announced plans to retrofit its entire fleet of Airbus A319 & A320 aircraft. The first of those A319s entered service earlier this year, and now the first of the A320s with the new interiors is flying passengers.
The good news is that these planes feature more first class seats, and more modern cabins with larger overhead bins. The bad news is that the cabins are tighter than in the past, since airlines are all about maximizing their aircraft layouts.
In this post:
American refreshing Airbus jets with more first class seats
American is refreshing the interiors of its entire Airbus A319 and A320 fleet over the next couple of years. With this project, we’re seeing the planes get power ports at every seat, larger overhead bins, and new seats with updated trim and finishes. In 2027, these planes will also get Starlink Wi-Fi, but that still requires some patience, and isn’t related to this retrofit project.



Perhaps most exciting of all is that each of these planes is getting an extra row of first class seats:
- Airbus A319s go from eight first class seats to 12 first class seats
- Airbus A320s go from 12 first class seats to 16 first class seats
American claims that this is in response to customers’ increasing demand for premium cabin seats. A 33-50% increase in first class seats on these aircraft is significant. Hopefully it leads to more AAdvantage upgrades, though in reality, a lot of unsold first class seats nowadays are upgraded with cash.
American kicked off this project earlier this year with A319s (as was first reported by JonNYC), as the first of those planes entered service in February 2026. Now as of June 2026, we’ve seen the first A320 with new cabins enter service. Among the A319s, the legacy American ones are being reconfigured first, followed by the legacy US Airways ones (meanwhile all the A320s are legacy US Airways).
As you can see based on the above pictures, the interiors match the new style colors you’ll find on Boeing 787-9s and Airbus A321XLRs, so the first class seats are similar to premium economy seats on those planes. I really like the cabin aesthetics.
In the interest of being thorough, let me clarify that American doesn’t have plans to increase first class capacity on its Boeing 737s (800s and MAX 8s) or Airbus A321s (ceos and neos) beyond the current 16 and 20 seats, respectively.
For context on how these planes fit into American’s fleet, the airline currently has 132 A319s and 48 A320s. Most of these were inherited by American during the merger with US Airways. The A319s are an average of over 21 years old, while the A320s are an average of over 24 years old. While they’re used throughout North America, you’ll find these jets the most in the Northeast.
Sadly enough, the 32 legacy American A319s are first to be reconfigured. Those are also American’s only “standard” narrow body jets with seat back TVs, and those screens are being ripped out.
Expect Airbus A319 & A320 economy cabins to get tighter
On balance, updates to these aircraft are probably good news, in terms of more first class seats, consistent power ports, modernized cabins, and larger overhead bins. For the past several years, American’s focus has been on having a consistent Airbus A321 and Boeing 737 fleet, and now we’re seeing the airline focus on its A319s and A320s, though with updated design choices.
The thing to keep in mind is that as American reconfigures these aircraft, we’re not only seeing more first class seats installed, but we’re also seeing overall capacity increase, meaning that seats are becoming tighter.
For example, Airbus A319s previously had 128 seats, comprised of eight first class seats and 120 economy seats. Once reconfigured, capacity increases to 132 seats, identical to what you’ll find on Delta, where there are 12 first class seats and 120 economy seats.
On the A320s, American isn’t going quite as high capacity as Delta. A320s previously had 150 seats, comprised of 12 first class seats and 138 economy seats. With the retrofits, capacity is remaining unchanged, with 16 first class seats and 134 economy seats. For context, Delta’s A320s have 157 seats, but I imagine American’s decision to keep the capacity at 150 seats was intentional, to avoid having an extra flight attendant (since one is required for every 50 seats). As a matter of fact, best I can tell, American is even doing a bit of seat blocking in economy, to keep that number at 150.
So, how is American able to maintain or even increase capacity, while also increasing the number of first class seats? In addition to a slight reduction in pitch across the plane (including in first class), we’re also seeing major changes to the rear galley. The actual amount of galley space is being decreased considerably, so that the lavatories can go in the very back of the plane, in a space that used to just have galley space. That’s not going to be great for crews, since it also means that a jump seat is on the back of a lavatory door.

For a sense of how cabins are changing, compare American’s old A319 seat map to American’s new A319 seat map, and in particular, look in the rear galley space.
Bottom line
American is well into its project to retrofit the Airbus A319 and A320 fleet. The biggest “headline” announcement is that American is adding a row of first class seats, meaning the planes will have 12 and 16 first class seats, respectively.
On top of that, these planes are getting full cabin overhauls, including larger overhead bins, power at every seat, a new design aesthetic, and a tighter cabin. It’s not just that pitch is being reduced, but the rear galley becomes much tighter, so that lavatories can be squeezed into the very back of the plane.
With this, American is able to increase the overall capacity of the A319 cabin (and maintain the capacity of the A320 cabin) while also adding a row of first class seats. These changes are a mixed bag. First class passengers or those looking to upgrade will be happy, while economy passengers and crews will likely be less happy.
I am sad that American is ripping out TVs from the 32 A319s that have them installed. For American’s domestic fleet, they’re basically the last reminder of American’s previous brief attempt to become more premium, around a decade ago.
What do you make of American’s Airbus cabin changes?
Updated cabins are nice. Interesting that they're putting in effort for a full interior overhaul for 21+ year old airframe rather than just retiring them (A319 is one of my least favorite AA aircraft to find myself on)... but maybe this will change that.
American has no idea of who and what they want to be
They want to be the USA premier carrier and then pull stunts like tighter economy class and less legroom in First. Adding to worse infighting meals
As a DFW resident it makes me sick and wish I had more choices——
"I want updated finishes and denser layouts with less legroom!" said nobody ever BUT, "I want lower ticket prices, less expensive upgrades or more free upgrades" said everybody ever and so, indirectly, we did ask.
The A319 will match the same configuration and DL refit, so AA isn't any better or worse. The big improvement will be the A320s same 150 verses DL 157 and a LOT more MCE seats plus an extra row of FC. The A320s really did need a remodel (beyond a refresh and this is a big plus moving forward (like NWA DC-9 updates in the 2000 that added years of life). We don't get as...
The A319 will match the same configuration and DL refit, so AA isn't any better or worse. The big improvement will be the A320s same 150 verses DL 157 and a LOT more MCE seats plus an extra row of FC. The A320s really did need a remodel (beyond a refresh and this is a big plus moving forward (like NWA DC-9 updates in the 2000 that added years of life). We don't get as many A319/320 in PHX any more mostly A321 and 737 but will be nice when we do to have the overhead space and device holders (not a huge advocate of seat back screens). Now if the A319/A320 look and feel as nice or nicer than the A321s it's a win for sure. Now if a row of seats could be removed from the 737s and a few MCE rows added, it would be a huge plus for AA passengers and especially us Platinum and higher flyers.
Another opportunity to expand AA's paltry extra legroom economy (MCE) offering wasted. Well behind Delta and United in offering extra legroom economy, including on these variants as well as on its newest planes (with 12 MCE seats on the XLR - none of which families can use because they are all exit row seats - and 18 on the 787P). Great to cram in an extra 4 FC seats (and I'm sure new / working...
Another opportunity to expand AA's paltry extra legroom economy (MCE) offering wasted. Well behind Delta and United in offering extra legroom economy, including on these variants as well as on its newest planes (with 12 MCE seats on the XLR - none of which families can use because they are all exit row seats - and 18 on the 787P). Great to cram in an extra 4 FC seats (and I'm sure new / working USB ports in economy will be appreciated), but the lack of more MCE seating is a significant downgrade compared to AA's competitors.
MCE!!!
One has observed when reading past posts that as soon as someone asks Walter Mitty Dunn that leading question, he goes dark. Let us now see if he boycotts this thread just because so many people ask ‘the’ question of him on the Starlink thread.
Apologies to those who are unaware of ’the question’, it is: “Why did Delta reportedly fire you Walter”.
Sadly, 1990 was clearly wrong,
there really is no difference in the posts you make under your unregistered account than with your registered account.
Therefore Walter, the answer to my question is?
Go on, be brave and act like a man by telling the truth.
@AeroB13a, I don't know why you keep comparing Tim to Walter Mitty. Thanks to you (really, I had to see why), last weekend I finally decided to watch "The Secret Life of Walter Mitty" (the 1947 version, not Ben Stiller's.) It was ok though Danny Kaye was wonderful as the daydreamer but I was more mesmerized by the colorful splendor of NYC in the mid-40s. In the end, Walter saves the day and gets the...
@AeroB13a, I don't know why you keep comparing Tim to Walter Mitty. Thanks to you (really, I had to see why), last weekend I finally decided to watch "The Secret Life of Walter Mitty" (the 1947 version, not Ben Stiller's.) It was ok though Danny Kaye was wonderful as the daydreamer but I was more mesmerized by the colorful splendor of NYC in the mid-40s. In the end, Walter saves the day and gets the girl of his dreams, the gorgeous Virginia Mayo. I also read the short story, which is just about his daydreaming without the criminal plot. We all fantasize about different things, like flying on Etihad's The Apartment, no?
No one ever mentions how these new seats are noticeably less comfortable than the old ones, especially in Business. Apart from curving forward towards the top (which forces your back info an uncomfortable forward arch), they have less padding overall. Sad!
Having a jump seat on the back of a lavatory door is INSANE. So, now, one F/A is just supposed to stand for the majority of the flight? If it's more than two hours, that's just cruelty, and it's all being done in the name of the almighty dollar.
AKA how to make your already miserable F/As even angrier.
Only a problem on airlines where the FA places higher priority on their Reader's Digest time than on their work.
"I want updated finishes and denser layouts with less legroom!" said nobody ever.
AA is really digging in its heels at being a LCC.
You have taken the words right out of my mouth Willy …. :-)
Did you miss the part in which the configuration is the exact same as DL'2 319 (or less dense for the A320)?
AA has many flaws impacting its performance, but some of these like fewer seats with more legroom vs DL including premium seats combined with an inability to extract any revenue premium out from that (or marketing that to be better known) is an easy fix.
The same plane for AA will now...
Did you miss the part in which the configuration is the exact same as DL'2 319 (or less dense for the A320)?
AA has many flaws impacting its performance, but some of these like fewer seats with more legroom vs DL including premium seats combined with an inability to extract any revenue premium out from that (or marketing that to be better known) is an easy fix.
The same plane for AA will now have opportunity to generate similar revenue as DL gets on these routes rather than starting with less revenue potential from the start.
Now the valid issues are lack of TV screens and lesser extra legroom seating, but not sure it's fair to attack AA for becoming an LCC when it's simply following full service carriers in the market.
Well, I want updated finishes and denser layouts with less legroom. That way, I can travel on AA in a nicer environment with huge fatasses driven to other airlines and therefore not seated next to me like last week when I was trapped in a window seat (which I hate; I prefer aisle but couldn't get one) by a tall fatass who somehow thought that he could fit into an exit row middle. I approve of the airline I fly driving the fatasses off and to other carriers.
Thanks again for the grin, ORD. You really are more fun than the GA preacher boy.
"Did you miss the part in which the configuration is the exact same as DL'2 319 (or less dense for the A320)?"
No, I just forgot to do the classic whataboutism, à la Tim Dunn. Thanks for covering so aptly.
This topic is bound to cause some interesting posts, Ben really knows what generates clicks.
Seeing how difficult seat certification has become I wonder how a jump seat can be approved to be attached to the lavatory door. Surely a door is inherently much less fixed than a wall/ bulkhead?
Already exists on some American ULCCs--I think maybe Frontier?
Also already in use on Jetblue, Delta, and United.
Rollout is taking super long.
Hope you’re surviving that heat wave. Yikes.