New poll question: would you rather fly first class or stay at a five star hotel?

It has been a while since I’ve switched up the poll question on the top right of the blog, so this seems like as good of a time as any. The last poll question asked whether reclining a seat on an airplane is a right or a privilege. Over 6,000 of you voted, and 57% of you thought it was a right.

This topic is surprisingly controversial, though I tend to agree. I think reclining your seat is a right, though believe people should still try to be courteous. Similarly I believe talking loudly on your cell phone in public is a right, but people should still try to be courteous. 😉

In coach I actually won’t recline on a daytime flight simply out of courtesy to the person seated behind me. That being said, if someone wants to recline, it’s entirely their right, in my opinion.

I sympathize with tall people, and understand when they say “but I already don’t have room for my legs.” Certainly true, though most airlines will allow you to purchase an exit row or extra legroom seat in advance, which they should probably be doing.

Anyway, let’s move on to the next question. If you had to decide between flying first class and staying at a five star hotel, which would you choose? Of course the simple answer is “neither, I want ’em both,” though that’s not always an option. So while there are many variables, generally speaking, would you rather fly first class and stay at an exceedingly mediocre hotel, or fly coach and stay at a five star hotel?

Yes, I realize it comes down to the flight length, how long you’re staying at the hotel, the configuration of the first class product, whether they offer hot nuts, etc., though use your best judgment. 😉

Cast your vote at the top right of the blog!

Conversations (29)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Amstel Guest

No doubt. Hotel, of course. That's an experience. The first class is only for more comfort, but can never be compared with a stay in a Four Seasons or Aman Resort.

0
‼ 0
Antonio Guest

You need to add a third choice: Would you rather ride an authentic Haughton elevator?

0
‼ 0
Boraxo Guest

I have to agree with Nybacker, Lucky - you really have to spell out some parameters to make this meaningful. For this purpose I am going to assume you mean First Class on a TATL or TPAC international flight vs. a 5* hotel for 3 nights in a major city. Because most of us can easily survive even a 5-hour transcon in a middle seat (which I did last month after my UA flight went mechanical) and similarly don't get much value on a 1 night stay in a 5* where we often arrive late and checkout early due to business requirements. Given that assumption, and assuming the worst (i.e. F on UA instead of F on SQ) I'd choose the F flight any day, because I simply won't sleep well if at all in the economy section, putting me out-of-commission for at least a day at my destination. Whereas I can easily survive at a lesser hotel as I rarely use any of the staff at a 5* nor do I care about the threadcount or other luxury perks. Keep in mind however that the length of stay and purpose/location of trip are critical factors. For example, if I was flying my family (4 tix) to a resort for a week I might take the 5* resort rather than the F seats. But it's a pretty subjective decision, you have to balance the quality of the 3* hotel (which might be mediocre in London or New York, and not great in Mexico) vs. the discomfort and exhaustion of flying with your kids in the cattle car. There is also the cost factor. If you are paying cash, F seats on TATL or TPAC could run your $10k per ticket, whereas I'd bet I can book a room at many 5* resorts for <$500 per night. So in reality, for most of us air travel in F is only an option if you can score upgrades or award seats vs. more relatively affordable 5* hotels.

0
‼ 0
Sarah Guest

Assuming long-haul - first, no question. I can be comfortable enough in a 3-star (especially where I have status), but I don't sleep well in economy. For short-hauls, the opposite answer. Under 8 hours, I don't care as much about the seat.

0
‼ 0
Euan Guest

I would fly First Class than stay in a 5 star hotel. When I travel, we are in the hotel to sleep. More often than not we don't even eat breakfast in the hotel. We like to get out and experience the city/town that we are visiting. Personally for us, as long as the hotel is in a safe area and clean we're happy. Wi-fi is an added benefit. We typically go for 4 star hotels but 3 star is also fine.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published