LAX’s Horrible Cell Phone Coverage Will Soon Improve

Airports pretty consistently have lousy cell phone coverage. Often there aren’t towers nearby, you have a ton of people trying to connect, and there are all kinds of structures that may block a signal (at least I’d assume those are the problems, as someone who knows little about telecom).

When it comes to cell phone coverage, some airports are worse than others. I fly into and out of LAX quite often, and at times I find it almost impossible to even check my email or send a text without connecting to the Wi-Fi (and as far as airport Wi-Fi goes, LAX’s isn’t great). I figured maybe I was just especially unlucky (or spending too much time on 787s), though it appears that LAX’s coverage is actually that bad. A September 2016 independent study put LAX dead last in a ranking of cellular network performance of the 50 busiest airports in the US.

The good news is that this will finally be improving. Per a meeting of the board of airport commissioners that took place on March 1, 2018, LAX has entered into an agreement with the major cell providers to upgrade the dismal coverage at the airport.

Under this agreement, AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile, and Verizon will operate cellular communications systems throughout the airport.

As you’d expect, the primary motivation here is to improve the guest experience:

This action advances this strategic goal and objective: Deliver Facilities & Guest Experiences that are Exceptional: Upgrade every element of the quest experience. The public visiting LAX, airport tenants, and LAWA employees should experience much improved cellular voice and data performance as the result of the cellular communication improvement upon the deployment of new cellular systems. In addition, LAX should move up in future cellular service rankings for airports.

Not only that, but they believe that improved cell phone coverage will allow LAWA employees and airport tenants to conduct business more efficiently.

These new towers will generate an estimated $1,932,000 in annual licensing fees for the airport, plus an additional $200,000 in revenue from rent, with an annual increase of 3%. The cellular communication companies will be picking up the cost of the design, construction, operation, and maintenance of these systems.

These improvements will be slowly phased in, area-by-area, so it’s possible that we’ll start to see some improvements within a few months. We can expect that hopefully the entire airport is upgraded within 18 months, though like everything that involves bureaucracy, delays are likely.

(Tip of the hat to Scott)

Conversations (22)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Randy Furtaco Guest

I work in the in-building wireless industry for a firm that could benefit either way this went. What you have here folks is the carriers having their way with the airport authority. What the carriers want to do is called DRAN or small cells. They hate to have a third party make them share a DAS or pay for the management/maintenance/carrier cat herding service a third party DAS owner offers to the venue. It's just added hassle and markup to them. Shot clock for carrier improvements? Performance metrics? Noper, you'll be receiving 3 or 4 single purpose, single agenda systems that the carriers do on their dime but *when/where/how it suits them* instead of a unified MANAGED approach. That new thing? It's more/less the status quo which has them in last place. At least they grabbed some more cash per passenger. I had thought the MWAA was the richest deal. This, among other dysfunction is why I fly BUR or SNA. Thanks for publishing this...interesting stuff! PS your phone call is now almost always on LTE. Voice coverage was table stakes in 2001. Now it's a capacity arms race. Voice is easy to solve for. 6 MIMO streams of LTE data is a bit more rigorous to build out.

0
‼ 0
Reesa New Member

LAX had a RFP out for a DAS system years ago, or at least they were in the preRFP stage. So this should have been done years ago but sounds like the airport council screwed something up. I wouldn't count on this happening quickly if it's going to have to go through airport approval for construction... just typical airport PR.

0
‼ 0
Michael Member

LAX for and international transfer is the new DFW/PHX - they evolved, LAX built - but didn’t add anything but more bodies in the chute. I’ll pick DFW for my trans Atlantic and pacific any day.

0
‼ 0
RD Member

Thank goodness! I fly out of lax at least once or twice every two weeks and hate that Verizon signal it pathetic there whenbw everywhere else in the city it's great! Would've have an issue but the Tom Bradley lounges also have fairly lousy wifi speed.

0
‼ 0
Steven M Guest

"What about those underground hamster connector tunnels?" They are truly epic! Totally a throwback to the days of pneumatic tube mail :D

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published

Keep Exploring OMAAT