The Retreat At Blue Lagoon’s Electronics Ban: Refreshing Or Extreme?

I wrote about my experience at The Retreat at Blue Lagoon, the ultra-luxury hotel at one of Iceland’s most famous tourist attractions. In this post, I’d like to talk about what’s no doubt the property’s most controversial policy, which I’ve seen some complaints about online. Is it a nice counter to the digitally connected world we otherwise live in, or just unreasonably and baselessly strict?

How The Retreat at Blue Lagoon electronics ban works

The Retreat at Blue Lagoon bans all electronic devices, including cameras, in the Retreat Spa and Retreat Lagoon. Let me emphasize that this is specific to The Retreat (the luxury compound at the Blue Lagoon), and it doesn’t apply to the main lagoon. The ban also doesn’t apply to the hotel, aside from the spa and lagoon.

Just to be crystal clear, the ban isn’t just against taking pictures, but if a phone is visible, they’ll ask you to bring it to reception. There are some rather stern security staff who closely monitor this.

The hotel describes this policy as being designed to allow people to unwind, and also to offer privacy to all guests. However, the policy doesn’t mean that you can’t have your picture taken. Instead, they offer for the security guards to take some pictures of you in the pool (using the hotel’s iPhone), and then they’ll email or AirDrop them to you.

Now these aren’t professional photographers, and I can’t say they do a particularly great job setting up photo shoots, but they’ll at least help you prove that you were there. 😉

What goes on behind these doors is a secret!

I’m conflicted about such a strict electronics policy

I don’t think I’ve ever stayed at a hotel with such a strict electronics policy. It’s understandable that many hotels ban taking pictures in changing rooms or other areas with nudity (for obvious reasons), but even at the lagoon, when that’s the main attraction? I’m not sure what to think.

On the one hand, I find the policy to be refreshing. Sometimes it feels like we live in a world where so many people travel just to be able to show off on social media, so it’s kind of cool to see everyone just enjoying themselves here, not focused on electronics.

Furthermore, there’s no denying that in everyday life, some people take photography to the extreme, and disrupt others. I imagine if photography were allowed without restrictions, you’d have some people here just doing photoshoots all day, like you’ll find at the Burj Al Arab (which is fun and entertaining in an entirely different way).

On the other hand, it seems awfully prescriptive to basically tell people that they can’t look at their phone all day. People have life commitments, and things they need to check on. I can understand a policy against phone calls, or against photography of others, etc., but just a blanket ban on having electronics on you?

I also have to imagine that this policy leaves some guests with a really bad impression. I suspect many guests who book don’t realize this policy exists. And I also imagine many guests are traveling for very special occasions, like honeymoons. Like it or not, people like to capture these kinds of moments.

Lastly, the policy just seems bad for marketing. Like I said when I wrote about the hotel, I had no clue what to expect prior to our stay, largely because there’s so little information out there about it. The lagoon at the hotel is unbelievably beautiful, yet you’ll almost never see pictures of it online. I have to imagine the hotel would see a lot more business without this policy.

Hey, this property can set its own rules, and people can decide if this is right for them. Personally, I appreciate the concept the hotel is going for, but I think the execution is a step too far. I think a fairer restriction would be a ban on phone calls, or a ban on pictures in the spa as such, or a ban on pictures that have other guests in them.

The problem is that it’s hard to create policies around common sense and discretion. For example, there were hour-long periods where we didn’t see a single other person, so you’d think that taking a picture wouldn’t disturb anyone. But hey, that’s just me…

Allowing photos would no doubt be great marketing

Bottom line

The Retreat at Blue Lagoon is an amazing hotel, though it has an electronics ban for its main feature. No electronics are allowed in the spa area and lagoon. We’re not just talking about pictures being banned, but you can’t even look at your electronics, let alone bring them.

While I appreciate the idea of encouraging people to disconnect, this is definitely one of the stranger hotel policies I’ve come across.

What do you make of the concept of this electronics ban? Are you a fan, or do you think it’s too extreme?

Conversations (54)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Dina II Guest

I was already intrigued to go, knowing this, i like it even more. I am so tired of people and their phones and egos. I have no tolerance for it at all. F you and your "memories". Open your eyes, isn't that why you are here? Experience life, thats why you worked your butt off to afford this. Your brain is so mushed up already, you need to have a digital record of your vacation at every intimate moment? So tired of peoples ego and need to "share"... you try to low key glow on insta and are just to pu*** to admit it.

0
‼ 0
TheOtherDavid Guest

“On the other hand, it seems awfully prescriptive to basically tell people that they can’t look at their phone all day. People have life commitments, and things they need to check on.” How did mankind exist for thousands of years before the invention of the iPhone? For me the ban is totally a selling point.

0
‼ 0
Ed Guest

100% agree with the rule. Places with rules like this that are enforced are very attractive. One of the delights of going to a a sento in Japan is the phone gets left in a locker. marketing - this is a features that markets the place. And for those that don’t like the rule go somewhere else. Hell is other people and their devices so I’m more than happy for you to go anywhere else.

0
‼ 0
It happened here. You were there. Guest

This is great and there should be more spaces like that. We go to a retreating Northern California every year with a strict device ban on prem (stricter than this) and you get in big, big trouble if you're found to be violating that restriction.

0
‼ 0
frrp Diamond

Is it in the terms and conditions when booking the hotel? If it is not and they dont make it obvious during booking, on the last day I would be openly carrying it and taking photos of the place. They cant take your money and then dump unknown stupid restrictions on you. The blue lagoon is fake anyway, its just a man-made lake thats heated.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published