Qantas’ Lounge Dress Code: Is Denial Over Uggs Ridiculous Or Refreshing?

Qantas’ Lounge Dress Code: Is Denial Over Uggs Ridiculous Or Refreshing?

10

Qantas is once again in the news, after a passenger was denied access to the Qantas Club for wearing uggs. Many people don’t realize this, but Qantas is one of the few airlines in the world to have a dress code for lounge access. As you’d expect, people are divided when it comes to how they feel about this.

Qantas has a “smart casual dress code” for lounges

Generally speaking, airlines don’t have dress codes when it comes to lounge access. The most common policy is that as long as you’re not violating the airline’s overall dress code, you can also access lounges. Most airlines basically just require you to wear clothes and cover your privates, so that doesn’t set the bar very high.

However, Qantas is an exception. The airline has a dress code specifically for its Qantas Clubs, as well as select Qantas Business Lounges. Here’s how the airline describes its “smart casual” dress code:

To ensure an enjoyable experience when you’re visiting our Qantas domestic lounges, we ask that you follow our smart casual dress code.

These guidelines are intended to create an environment everyone can enjoy, so please be mindful of your choice of clothing and footwear when visiting Qantas Clubs and Business Lounges in Adelaide, Brisbane, Canberra, Melbourne, Perth and Sydney.

In keeping with this, we ask you wear smart casual clothing and shoes when entering one of our lounges in Australia or overseas.

The airline has a list of the types of things that can’t be worn in lounges, including tank tops, beachwear, sleepwear (including uggs), rubber thongs, and more.

Sign listing Qantas lounge dress code rules, including banned items like tank tops and rubber thongs
Qantas Lounge dress code
Qantas lounge dress code signage detailing smart casual requirements
Qantas Lounge dress code

One interesting wrinkle is that the lounge terms state that “individual lounge managers will have discretion to administer these standards as they reasonably deem appropriate in the circumstances.”

This dress code is once again making the news, as a passenger was denied lounge access for wearing ugg slippers. The woman claimed she has visited around five lounges in the past month wearing the same slippers, and didn’t have any issues until now.

She said the lounge was quite busy, and because she didn’t fit the “business” look, the staff made a “beeline for her.” She argued that if there is a dress code, it needs to be enforced everywhere. “They’ve got outside soles on them. It’s an airport. I just don’t understand.”

My take on Qantas’ controversial lounge dress code

Obviously people tend to be divided on what one should wear when flying. Personally I’m opposed to these kinds of dress codes, and find them to be silly:

  • Ultimately an airport lounge isn’t some exclusive social club, but it’s a place to sit in comfort, and grab a drink and snack before a flight
  • Many people are traveling on long haul flights and dress for comfort; heck, Qantas even gives out pajamas on long haul flights, so why is there a need to dress up on your layover in the lounge?
  • I just don’t care what other people wear at airports, as long as it’s not inappropriate or offensive

I totally get people who like to “dress the part” when flying in premium cabins, and I think that’s great. I just think that standard shouldn’t necessarily be applied to others.

Let me be clear — I’m not advocating for people to wear the above articles of clothing, and I agree that people could maybe put a little more effort into their appearance when traveling. But at the same time, I simply don’t care, because my experience is in no way impacted by what others choose to wear.

But hey, Qantas runs its own lounges, it has the right to make its own rules, and that’s perfectly fine.

Interior seating area of the Qantas lounge at London Heathrow Airport
I just don’t really care what others wear, I guess

Bottom line

Qantas is one of the few airlines to have a dress code for some its lounges, as the airline asks passengers to dress in smart casual clothes. Every so often this makes headlines when passengers are frustrated over their lounge denial.

I do find it interesting how Qantas is one of the only airlines to have such a policy. In theory I can appreciate where the airline is coming from, but I’m also pretty “libertarian” when it comes to airport dress codes. I think everyone should wear what they want, as long as it’s not actively offensive.

What’s your take on Qantas’ lounge dress code?

Conversations (10)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Jack Guest

    It's really a no-bogans policy, which is necessary in Australia.

  2. 1990_ Diamond

    So, Qantas found those boots to be... UGGly. *ba dum tss*

    LoyaltyLobby included the passenger's own 'take' on the incident. Cassidy was like, 'I'm a Gold member, and just wanted a glass of wine before my flight... I love Qantas, and fly them all the time... Qantas please don't hate me.' She blames the Daily Mail for taking it out of context and going hyperbolic. I'm kinda with her on this one.

    This 'incident' happened...

    So, Qantas found those boots to be... UGGly. *ba dum tss*

    LoyaltyLobby included the passenger's own 'take' on the incident. Cassidy was like, 'I'm a Gold member, and just wanted a glass of wine before my flight... I love Qantas, and fly them all the time... Qantas please don't hate me.' She blames the Daily Mail for taking it out of context and going hyperbolic. I'm kinda with her on this one.

    This 'incident' happened at the Qantas Club in Melbourne; it's winter in Australia now (and it can actually get cold there), so, you can't blame her for wanting to have warm feet.

  3. Supersanborn Gold

    I'd be supportive if they asked you to change upon entry. Or if they reminded people to change on the plane before landing. But otherwise it could create a surprise if you dressed for comfort to sleep.

  4. Nerfington Guest

    Totally disagree Ben. Long time lurker, first time commenter, I feel obliged to share this perspective.

    How people dress is not a tiny matter of personal convenience, it’s a subconscious signal to other people what kind of place this is, and research has shown it actually changes how the wearer behaves. A lounge full of people who made a minimal effort to put on a proper t-shirt and pants reads as “this is a...

    Totally disagree Ben. Long time lurker, first time commenter, I feel obliged to share this perspective.

    How people dress is not a tiny matter of personal convenience, it’s a subconscious signal to other people what kind of place this is, and research has shown it actually changes how the wearer behaves. A lounge full of people who made a minimal effort to put on a proper t-shirt and pants reads as “this is a public, paid, somewhat elevated over the terminal space.” A room full of pjs, slippers, gym shorts, and flip-flops reads as “this is an overflow waiting area”.

    Obviously I am not suggesting everyone dress in suits or business attire, that regulated era is long gone. But this is one person optimizing their own comfort with everyone else absorbing the visual and social cost. A classic externality

    You want to not even put in minimal effort & look like a slob, great there is the whole terminal for you to do so. Love that Qantas has minimal dress standards, wish we could bring some of this to the US

    1. Ben Schlappig OMAAT

      @ Nerfington -- I respect your take! :-) I'd slightly quibble with this:
      "A lounge full of people who made a minimal effort to put on a proper t-shirt and pants reads as 'this is a public, paid, somewhat elevated over the terminal space.'"

      Isn't that exactly what lounges are, though?

  5. This_comes_to_mind Member

    I love all the restrictions, but don't get the uggs thing. There are so many things to dislike about the small percentage of pax who seem to want to make your lounge experience terrible. Uggs doesn't make the list.

    1. CoryCesar Diamond

      Yep. Loud "smart-casual" jack-asses barking about their deals, screaming nine-year-olds running wild, luggage-sprawl onto chairs, and drunk lonely middle-aged meltdowns; that's what's infesting the lounges here in the US, at least.

    2. 1990_ Diamond

      This comes to mind, since you say you travel there, it can get cold Down Under (AU and NZ) this time of year (it is the end of their winter after all). Ugg boots may actually be appropriate, both based on those conditions and historically. Sheepskin boots were originally from Australia. (Great way for surfers to quickly warm cold feet after coming out of the cold Southern Ocean...)

  6. CoryCesar Diamond

    I am glad that my "clean hi-vis uniform" is appropriate attire. Good on you QF! Now, if this can also be applied to inappropriate lounge behavior, too.

    1. Rain New Member

      My guess is that is specifically specified to be inclusive to the waves of FIFO workers who're going through the airports and dress the part at the airport too

Recent Comments The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Jack Guest

It's really a no-bogans policy, which is necessary in Australia.

0
0
1990_ Diamond

So, Qantas found those boots to be... UGGly. *ba dum tss* LoyaltyLobby included the passenger's own 'take' on the incident. Cassidy was like, 'I'm a Gold member, and just wanted a glass of wine before my flight... I love Qantas, and fly them all the time... Qantas please don't hate me.' She blames the Daily Mail for taking it out of context and going hyperbolic. I'm kinda with her on this one. This 'incident' happened at the Qantas Club in Melbourne; it's winter in Australia now (and it can actually get cold there), so, you can't blame her for wanting to have warm feet.

0
0
Supersanborn Gold

I'd be supportive if they asked you to change upon entry. Or if they reminded people to change on the plane before landing. But otherwise it could create a surprise if you dressed for comfort to sleep.

1
0
Nerfington Guest

Totally disagree Ben. Long time lurker, first time commenter, I feel obliged to share this perspective. How people dress is not a tiny matter of personal convenience, it’s a subconscious signal to other people what kind of place this is, and research has shown it actually changes how the wearer behaves. A lounge full of people who made a minimal effort to put on a proper t-shirt and pants reads as “this is a public, paid, somewhat elevated over the terminal space.” A room full of pjs, slippers, gym shorts, and flip-flops reads as “this is an overflow waiting area”. Obviously I am not suggesting everyone dress in suits or business attire, that regulated era is long gone. But this is one person optimizing their own comfort with everyone else absorbing the visual and social cost. A classic externality You want to not even put in minimal effort & look like a slob, great there is the whole terminal for you to do so. Love that Qantas has minimal dress standards, wish we could bring some of this to the US

0
1
This_comes_to_mind Member

I love all the restrictions, but don't get the uggs thing. There are so many things to dislike about the small percentage of pax who seem to want to make your lounge experience terrible. Uggs doesn't make the list.

2
1
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published