Hotel Brand Dilution: The Maddening But Predictable Trend Of Growth Over Quality

Here’s a topic that I’ve written about in passing endlessly, but which I’ve never dedicated a post to, so I think it’s time. Can we just take a moment to talk about the complete collapse of hotel brand standards over the years? What’s going on, what’s driving this change, and how should us consumers adjust our travel planning because of this?

Hotel brands mean very little at this point

Going back many years, hotel brands were rather consistent. When you booked a Grand Hyatt or Sheraton, you sort of knew what you were going to get. That’s not to say that all properties were the same (some hotels may be newly opened, while some might soon be undergoing a renovation), but the idea is that you roughly knew what to expect.

Nowadays that’s simply not the case anymore, and there’s so much inconsistency, even within each brand. The irony is that the number of hotel brands has exploded, so you’d assume that means it’s easier to associate specific hotels with specific properties. For example, in 2000, Hilton had around six hotel brands. Now in 2026, Hilton has nearly 30 hotel brands. Despite that, there’s less consistency within each brand than ever before.

The explanation for this is very simple — ultimately us guests and loyalty program members are not the customers of the major hotel brands, but instead, we’re the product being sold to prospective hotel investors. Hotels are mostly individually owned, and then the hotel groups get a cut on revenue for managing the property, having it in their loyalty ecosystem, etc. More hotels equal more money, essentially.

With major hotel groups being desperate for growth, the reality is that the actual hotel owners are in the driver’s seat. Does the major hotel group want the owner to invest money in aspects of the experience? Well, the owner will just threaten to go with another brand, and then eventually the hotel brand will cave.

The examples of this are endless, but just to give a few examples that come to mind:

Just to give a couple of examples, even among existing Ritz-Carlton Reserve properties, the brand’s Niseko property, Higashiyama, really feels like it was intended to be a limited service hotel when built, and was then rebranded at the last minute.

Ritz-Carlton Reserve Niseko exterior

For that matter, while the Ritz-Carlton Turks & Caicos has beautiful views, does this really look like what you’d expect from a luxury property?

Ritz-Carlton Turks & Caicos hallway

So to sum it up, the explanation for what we’re seeing is very simple — hotel groups want to grow, and there’s a lot of competition for signing contracts with developers, so the hotel brands are willing to be flexible on standards in the name of growth. After all, that’s how they make money, and they’re obviously not worried about losing customers because of this.

It also has to be acknowledged that with interest rates not being particularly low, appetite for newly built properties is limited. As a result, hotel groups are largely relying for conversions for growth, and those are inherently going to be less consistent without major investments.

How I navigate this problem as a consumer

More than ever before, I simply don’t assume that a hotel is of a certain caliber simply because it belongs to a particular hotel group or brand. So while a certain type of branding may get me to look at a hotel in the first place, I increasingly look at all the pictures of the property, read reviews, and try to do my own research, before selecting a hotel. I will add that I have two exceptions to my skepticism.

First, I think there are some really small hotel brands that still very much care about quality over growth. These are largely passion projects that aren’t publicly traded, where it’s all about having a product that they’re proud of.

Now, I have to say, I think there’s sort of a critical mass where that just goes out the window. For example, all the brands I can think of that have such high standards are ones that have fewer than a dozen properties — I’m talking brands like Airelles, Capella, Oetker Hotels, etc.

Airelles is an incredible hotel group

Second, while the physical quality and amenities do differ greatly across properties at just about all major brands, there are some that consistently do a great job with service, and that’s worth something. For example, among the major hotel groups, Four Seasons is probably the brand with the most consistent service standards.

That’s because they really put a lot of effort into how they manage their hotels and train employees. I imagine that’s largely because they can’t use a loyalty program as a crutch to fill rooms — they need to win business with every stay.

Is every Four Seasons perfect? Of course not! It’s a huge brand. But for a hotel group of its size, I think it does the best job with consistently delivering high quality service.

Four Seasons is remarkably consistent with service

Bottom line

Hotel brands have become so incredibly inconsistent over the years. The irony is that hotel companies have created so many more brands, so you’d think it would be easier to pick the right branding for a hotel. But it almost feels like the more brands there are, the less consistency there even is within each brand.

A brand all about remote locations? Stick it in the middle of one of the world’s biggest cities! A brand about being in the heart of the action? Put it next to a suburban Walmart and fields. That’s just how things go nowadays…

What do you make of the trend we’ve seen with hotel brand dilution?

Conversations (58)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Eliteflyer Guest

I used to have the same opinion about FS service until a FHR stay at the Four Seasons Sydney. The size of the hotel and level of service felt more like a JW Marriott than a Four Seasons.

0
‼ 0
BjornFree Guest

The shitification of everything has not spared the hotel or travel industry.

0
‼ 0
zrs70 New Member

I’m gonna add a comment in the form of a letter that I recently wrote to Hilton regarding the disastrous state of the Doubletree in Times Square, West. My experience was hardly worth the cookie. I got a check-in, and I am hard-pressed to understand how Hilton can hold its head high. Dear Hilton Guest Relations, I just spent the night at the DoubleTree Times Square, and the experience was completely unacceptable. After checking in around 7:00 p.m., I entered my room (36XX) and immediately found it excessively hot. Because I was in a hurry, I contacted the hotel through Hilton’s text/chat service and asked that someone check the temperature and the air conditioning. The agent assured me that this would be taken care of. When I returned around 10:30 p.m., the room was 86 degrees. I called the front desk repeatedly, but for nearly an hour I could not reach anyone. The phone would ring, place me on hold, and then disconnect. When I finally reached the desk, I was told that an engineer would be sent to my room immediately. By 11:30 p.m., no one had come. I then spent another hour and a half trying to reach the front desk. I finally got through around 1:00 a.m. The employee offered to relocate me to another Hilton property. Given that I had to be up only a few hours later, I explained that moving hotels at that point was not a reasonable solution. I asked instead for a fan. She assured me that one would be delivered to my room. No one ever came. I was left in an 86-degree room with no functioning air conditioning and no assistance from the hotel. Ultimately, I had to take a cold shower in the middle of the night simply to cool down enough to sleep. What makes this even more troubling is that the employee told me this was a “one-off.” A quick review of the hotel’s online reviews, however, suggests that problems with room temperatures and air conditioning are neither new nor isolated. If this is a known and recurring problem, representing it to a guest as an isolated incident is deeply concerning. This was not a minor inconvenience. The hotel failed repeatedly at every level: the room was not reasonably habitable, my initial request was not addressed, the front desk was extraordinarily difficult to reach, the promised engineer never arrived, and the promised fan never arrived. I ultimately spent the night uncomfortable, exhausted, and unable to get the sleep I needed. This experience was beyond inexcusable, and frankly, I would be embarrassed if I were responsible for this property. I expect Hilton to do more than simply apologize. I believe I should be fully comped for this night, and given the extraordinary failure to respond to the situation—and the fact that I was effectively left without a usable hotel room—I also expect additional compensation or consideration. I would appreciate a prompt response explaining how Hilton intends to address this matter. Sincerely,

0
‼ 1
FNT Delta Diamond Guest

"For example, among the major hotel groups, Four Seasons is probably the brand with the most consistent service standards." That's because Four Seasons does NOT franchise.

0
‼ 0
FNT Delta Diamond Guest

The issue it seems is no hotel owner wants to own the fourth Hilton in any given city. So the chains create new brands. It's weird because you don't see McDonald's franchisees telling McDonald's that they want a different brand to differentiate them from the McDonald's owned by someone else a mile away.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published