Garuda Indonesia Fires CEO For Trying To Make Airline Profitable

I love Garuda Indonesia, and find that the airline has among the best customer service out there. The national carrier has been struggling financially, unfortunately, as is the case with many mismanaged government owned airlines.

The good news is that the airline has been on the road to recovery (financially). Garuda Indonesia’s CEO (up until earlier this week) was appointed in April 2017, and he has been making some tough decisions for the airline, including significant cost cutting.

For example, the airline recently announced that they’re cutting flights to London. I’m of course sad about that, but it made sense, given that the airline was losing money on the route. Similarly, the airline had announced a while ago that they’d start flying to Los Angeles, but they put that idea on hold, realizing that there’s no way they’d make money operating the route.

The airline has also been trying to cut costs with employees and defer aircraft, realizing that bigger isn’t always better.

Garuda Indonesia’s financial performance has been improving, as the airline “only” reported a net loss of 116 million USD for the first half of the year, compared to 281 million USD in the first half of the prior year.

This week the company held a shareholders’ meeting during which they sacked the CEO, replacing him with the CEO of another state-owned company. They also changed six of the eight people on Garuda Indonesia’s board.

The company’s new CEO is Askara Danadiputra, who is currently the CEO of state-owned seaport operator  Pelindo III. He was also Garuda Indonesia’s CFO from December 2014 until April 2016, so at least he has some airline experience.

So, what’s his top priority as the new CEO of Garuda Indonesia? As noted by Asian Nikkei Review:

“The leadership must face the turbulent economic conditions, starting from the depreciated rupiah to rising oil prices. The main focus of the new management is … an increase in employee happiness. Because making the employees happy will improve customer service.”

In principle I like the idea of prioritizing employees, realizing that they’re the key to delivering the experience for customers. However, I do find it somewhat concerning that this is his primary goal, given the situation they’re currently in.

With such a radical change, both with the ousting of the CEO and six of the eight board seats replaced, my guess is that we’ll see Garuda Indonesia going back to some of their old, unprofitable practices. Who knows, as customers that might not be a bad thing, since we might see the London flight resorted, and we might see that flight to Los Angeles actually happen. 😉

It’s clear the government’s goal with the airline (at least at this very moment) isn’t just for the airline to turn a direct profit. I’ll be curious to see how long they stay on this current path, and until they once again decide that the top priority is cost cutting and a return to profitability.

What do you make of this Garuda Indonesia leadership change?

Conversations (22)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Asian Miler Guest

Profit, you say? They should've hired Scott Kirby instead, perhaps...

0
‼ 0
Andy Guest

GA is a government owned airline and actually a very fine one. Thirty years on from the privatization mania it is generally accepted that state owned enterprises can deliver excellent service and are arguably the right format if markets are controlled rather than liberalized. (And many private airlines, including the ones in the US deliver miserable services ...) There's only a problem with state-owned-enterprises, if an economic area has liberalized their market (e.g. the EU, the US domestically) and private enterprises are facing state-owned competitors. Some other nice state-owned carriers include Aeroflot, Qatar, Emirates, Singapore, Thai ... just to mention a few.

0
‼ 0
Alain Millett Guest

As a regular flyer on GA internationally - mainly SYD to DPS but I have flown intra Asia as well and sometimes domestic in Indonesia, out of all those flights and I might do 4 roundtrips a year all in J, I have only ever had 1 hiccup so even as way back at the 2001 they were an amazing airline, and have only every got better. I rate GA J better than SQ - I prefer the friendliness of the GA crew - while I acknowledge that SQ has more choice with catering with book the cook, and better entertainment - I prefer to fly on GA. Its sad to see so many changes with destinations and flights - years ago GA was really popular from Australia to Europe with flights to AMS FRA and LGW - lots of people booked early and got really good prices AUD $1300 in Y return and about $3300 in J return, but with the flights now requiring an overnight in CGK they have lost all of that thru traffic, and often you could get really good fares to other Asian ports with a stopover in either DPS or CGK in each direction, these have all dried up too. Maybe the corruption with is part of doing business in Indonesia in impacting on this. A number of years ago I boarded a A330 in DPS for CGK, before heading to SYD, (no direct flight on a Saturday night), and most of the J cabin was partitioned off. My seat mate made comment about it, he was a Senator and said this was the aircraft that had been on an official Presidential visit to I think Korea - 10 days earlier - he was horrified the aircraft had not been returned to normal, and all those seats that could have been sold since then. When we got up to deplane at CGK - the door to this section was open - and there was just the 1 J seat set up in the middle of that area, so imagine an A330, with just the A & C seats - the rest of the cabin partitioned off - for 1 seat - 24 seats going begging for sale. Hopefully GA will never return to those bad old days Hopefully its only rosy skis and generous profits for the mystical dragon ...

0
‼ 0
J Dee Guest

@Bobs You realise the term "Third-World" does not apply to Indonesia by any measure? Its economy, for example, is the largest in SE Asia & is among the top 20 largest economies in the World?

0
‼ 0
Ray Guest

Best of luck to the new CEO. Hope he can bring the airline back to black, starting with improving their punctuality.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published