Emirates Launching Flights To Santiago As Of July 2018

Emirates Launching Flights To Santiago As Of July 2018

12

Emirates has just announced a new route that will be their new farthest destination from Dubai (about 9,200 miles away), though the route won’t be nonstop.

Emirates will be launching 5x weekly flights between Dubai and Santiago via Sao Paulo as of July 5, 2018. Emirates already operates daily A380 flights to Sao Paulo, so this additional frequency will mean that Emirates will fly 12x weekly to Sao Paulo, with five of those flights continuing to Santiago.

The new flight will operate with the following schedule:

EK263 Dubai to Sao Paulo departing 9:05AM arriving 5:00PM
EK263 Sao Paulo to Santiago departing 6:30PM arriving 9:40PM

EK264 Santiago to Sao Paulo departing 1:10AM arriving 5:55AM
EK264 Sao Paulo to Dubai departing 7:45AM arriving 5:15AM (+1 day)

The westbound flight will operate on Tuesdays, Thursdays, Fridays, Saturdays, and Sundays, while the eastbound flight will operate on Mondays, Wednesdays, Fridays, Saturdays, and Sundays. If you take the journey the entire way through, the travel time between Dubai and Santiago is 20hr35min westbound and 20hr5min eastbound.

This new route will be flown by a Boeing 777-200LR, featuring 38 business class seats in a 2-2-2 configuration, and 264 seats in economy, in a 3-4-3 configuration. This represents a new configuration for the airline, because until recently Emirates’ 777-200LRs were in a three cabin layout. However, Emirates is eliminating first class on these planes, and in the process is also eliminating the dreaded middle seat in business class.

This route represents Emirates’ fourth destination in South America, after Buenos Aires, Rio de Janeiro, and Sao Paulo.

Emirates will have pick-up rights on the flight between Santiago and Sao Paulo, so this is a comfortable new way for people to get between Brazil and Chile.

What’s interesting here is that in early 2016 Qatar Airways had announced their plan to add flights to Santiago, though they’ve put that route on hold. They claim it’s due to aircraft availability, though I doubt that’s actually the case, given that the current blockade, and the number of planes that makes available. Instead I suspect they just can’t justify starting such a long route in their current situation.

In many ways it would have made more sense for Qatar Airways to fly to Santiago, since LATAM is based there. Both airlines are in oneworld, and Qatar even owns an equity stake in LATAM. Meanwhile Emirates won’t have much connecting traffic in Santiago based on their current partnerships.

My guess is that Emirates saw Qatar Airways’ interest here, and decided to take advantage of the situation and beat them to Santiago.

Ultimately the 777-200LR is fairly low capacity, and by operating the flight through Sao Paulo, they should be able to get a good mix of travelers going to Brazil and Chile.

While I don’t see myself ever taking the flight from Dubai, I could certainly see myself taking the fifth freedom flight between Sao Paulo and Santiago.

What do you make of Emirates’ new flight to Santiago?

Conversations (12)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. The nice Paul Diamond

    @ Hsn

    There’s also the option of transiting through New Zealand (EZE-AKL). Avoids the nightmare lottery of US immigration (I *always* avoid US transits if at all possible).

    I’m using that route for a trip to Tokyo next month, with a 3 hour layover in Auckland. Similarly (if a bit more out of the way), SCL-SYD on, eg, Qantas.

  2. Hsn Guest

    I can see logic between behind this route.
    Both Chile and Brazil have a strong economic tie with China and Japan. However there aren’t many choices for these routes. You would need either transit through Europe (not ideal because of infamous baggage handling like Paris airport) , US (not ideal because of visa requirements) , Mexico and Canada (not really ideal because of limit amount of flights)

    So Middle East is one ideal transit...

    I can see logic between behind this route.
    Both Chile and Brazil have a strong economic tie with China and Japan. However there aren’t many choices for these routes. You would need either transit through Europe (not ideal because of infamous baggage handling like Paris airport) , US (not ideal because of visa requirements) , Mexico and Canada (not really ideal because of limit amount of flights)

    So Middle East is one ideal transit location for East Asia / Latin America traffic

  3. Ryan Guest

    Yes Malc. From what I understand Emirates is not placing the new business class into existing aircraft, they are only being fitted with new deliveries.

  4. Malc Guest

    So it's the same seat with wider aisles?

  5. Marco Guest

    Does anyone know if the seat map for this plane is available? Hoping they upgrade the business class seats to the new ones.

  6. Joey Diamond

    I wish they flew GIG-SCL as I much prefer GIG to GRU. Ah well. Nonetheless, I always think competition is good for the airline industry from a customer point of view.

  7. Ryan Guest

    Business Class will be 2-2-2 like Ft Lauderdale. Wonder if they will update to the new seat. Sounds like they are keeping the current seat.

  8. Hong Konger Guest

    Worth mentioning that LATAM will soon fly a similar route:
    SCL-GRU-TLV with similar frequency.

  9. The nice Paul Diamond

    Is there a 5th freedom right in place?

    Routes online reported yesterday:
    “The airline currently does not have local traffic rights on Sao Paulo Guarulhos – Santiago de Chile sector.”

    It’d be great if they did: their Rio-Buenos Aires flight is a God-send for a weird trip I’m doing in a few weeks.

  10. Marty Guest

    Delighted to hear they have pick-up rights between GRU and SCL. I sometimes feel there's a bit of price fixing between the current airlines on the route.

  11. Z Guest

    This makes me wonder why BOG/MEX/LIM have been left out of radar so far

Featured Comments Most helpful comments ( as chosen by the OMAAT community ).

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

The nice Paul Diamond

@ Hsn There’s also the option of transiting through New Zealand (EZE-AKL). Avoids the nightmare lottery of US immigration (I *always* avoid US transits if at all possible). I’m using that route for a trip to Tokyo next month, with a 3 hour layover in Auckland. Similarly (if a bit more out of the way), SCL-SYD on, eg, Qantas.

0
Hsn Guest

I can see logic between behind this route. Both Chile and Brazil have a strong economic tie with China and Japan. However there aren’t many choices for these routes. You would need either transit through Europe (not ideal because of infamous baggage handling like Paris airport) , US (not ideal because of visa requirements) , Mexico and Canada (not really ideal because of limit amount of flights) So Middle East is one ideal transit location for East Asia / Latin America traffic

0
Matt Member

Farthest*

0
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
4,523,713 Miles Traveled

25,807,500 Words Written

28,675 Posts Published