Here’s Why Emirates Flies “Visibly Inferior” Planes To India

Last Wednesday an Emirates 777 crash landed in Dubai. Fortunately all passengers evacuated safely, though tragically one firefighter died during the rescue efforts.

Once video footage of the evacuation surfaced, I posted about the number of passengers who decided to take their carry-on bags with them.

https://twitter.com/rehanquereshi/status/760883989490040833

A lot of people online tried to justify what the passengers were doing, explaining that life in the Gulf for Indian workers can be very tough. Trust me, I understand that, and I get all the reasons that someone would want to take bags with them when they’re being evacuated. It makes perfect sense to me, and it’s a natural instinct not to want to part ways with your belongings.

However, it doesn’t change the fact that over the years several planes have exploded during evacuations, killing dozens and dozens of people. By slowing down the evacuation process, you’re quite literally putting other peoples’ lives at risk, and that’s something you don’t have the right to do no matter what the circumstances are.

Again, I get the hardships faced in the Gulf by foreign workers, but we’re talking life and death here, and the way I see it, this is a black-and-white topic. There’s simply no excuse, and I was harsh on this flight in the same way that I was harsh when a flight in the US had an evacuation. End of story.

An op-ed piece was published in the Times of India about the evacuation, entitled “Emirates crash-landing incident brings to light the deep-rooted racism against Indians.” The writer supports his/her argument with three points:

  • Some people were leaving racist comments on Facebook following the incident
  • A Twitter user explained the challenges of life in the Gulf, and that we’re not being understanding enough of the circumstances faced by Indians in the Gulf
  • A former Indian union minister, Shashi Tharoor, accused Emirates of sending visibly inferior planes to India, and wanted the airline to investigate

Let’s look at that last point, because it’s a Facebook post that received over 7,000 likes, was shared over 1,700 times, and has hundreds of comments, mostly in support of the idea:

So, he’s calling on Emirates to “review their policy on the type, age and quality of aircraft” used on their routes between Dubai and India. There are lots of comments suggesting that Emirates is somehow being unfair towards the Indian market, but there’s actually a pretty straightforward explanation.

The plane involved in the incident was A6-EMW, a 777-300 which took its first flight in July 2003, making it 13 years old. First of all, when an airline has good maintenance, there’s virtually no correlation between an airplane’s age and how safe it is. Planes go through all kinds of checks frequently, and every several years planes are basically taken apart and put back together. Even if there were a correlation, a 13 year old 777 is not old by any stretch of the imagination.

Nonetheless, it was one of Emirates’ older 777s, so why do they fly this to India? Very simple, because it’s one of their high density regional configurations, and not one of their “ER” (extended range) aircraft, since that’s not needed for such a short flight. Here’s a listing of Emirates’ 777 fleet, and as you’ll see, all 11 of the 777-300 aircraft were among the first delivered. Virtually all the later versions of the plane were 777-300ERs.

Not only is the longer range of the aircraft not needed, but presumably based on the route’s yield and demand, a high density configuration aircraft was a better fit.

Why might these planes be in worse condition, in theory (though I think this is very relative and circumstantial)?

  • The plane has more seats than the longhaul three cabin version of the plane, and generally more passengers means more wear and tear
  • Generally a plane that operates a lot of frequencies (meaning primarily short flights) will have more wear and tear, due to the number of flights it operates, rather than an ultra longhaul aircraft, which may just operate one flight per day

Basically there’s a high correlation between the total number of passengers flying a plane, and the shape it may appear to be in.

Emirates-777-Economy

Bottom line

We still don’t know what happened on Emirates flight 521, though I think it’s highly unlikely it has to do with the plane being 13 years old, or with the perceived condition of the interior of the aircraft. There’s a perfectly straightforward explanation for why Emirates operates these flights to certain cities in India, so there’s no need for conspiracy theories here.

(Tip of the hat to Apurva)

Conversations (77)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

David Z Guest

@Loz shut th f**k up, you jealous indian, EK will survive WHATSOEVER no matter what!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

0
‼ 0
David Z Guest

@Jeet shut up, the SkyCruiser is superb and the J and especially Y are excellent, these aircraft are NOT "crappy" at all. Thank you so very much.!!!.

0
‼ 0
nincompoop Guest

I travel in this sector regularly. It is true that the planes are indeed in a very inferior/degraded situation. The infotainment system is historic while the wear and tear is very visible. The 13 years mentioned in this article is an exception, as usually they are a minimum of 16 years old (I regularly check flightradar when i travel). I read a comment here about why should Emirates fly a good aircraft to a not so attractive or rich destination. Well Emirates became what it is today by flying these destinations. The main money maker for Emirates when it started off, has been and is the Indian sector, particularly the South Indian sector like the one in the incident above (Mainly due to the fact that the vast majority of expat workers ranging from blue collar to highly qualified executives are from this area of India). These flights were usually fully booked with 2 -3 flights daily in the initial days of Emirates since there weren't many other players in this sector then. Also thanks to the laid back attitude of the Indian government since Air India is government owned. Even today, these sectors make the most money for Emirates. Now, what prompted me to write here is that I traveled this sector again last week. I noticed that all the planes flying now are brand new or less than 1 year old. Is it an interesting coincidence? You tell me Mr. Lucky.

0
‼ 0
Desi Guest

@DSG You are wrong. I bet most of these are middle class and may even be Emirates Group employees. One guy interviewed was a Doctor in Dubai.What about US residents of Indian origin. HYD is EK's #1 USA traffic source. All Indian carriers have very young fleet. Do your research. AI has some old classic A320s on domestic routes, but bulk of its fleet is young. Indigo's doesn't keep for more than 6 years. SpiceJet and GoAir also have young fleet. Indians do abuse interiors of Air India, because they think they paid for the planes. Counter intuitive, any one would think if you paid for you care for it. But they are well mannered in dealing with property of foreign and private carriers. EU carriers used to operate very old aircraft with torn interiors. But after losing market to ME3 they are operating new planes or planes with refurbished clean tidy cabins. While preaching others about brand new shiny planes, EK lost its way. It doesn't have money to refurbish old leased planes. It does't have money to change old J to flatbad or upgrade old ICE. All its revenue goes to paying for glut of new capacity it is adding. Question is why can't it return all old planes immediately and have only relatively new ones. It will reduce the glut and core resource crunch.

0
‼ 0
Dan Palangio Guest

I concur with DSG - and another point, as much as we like to say this is a developing world problem..that's not the case... there are illiterate (especially when it comes to aviation and etiquette) everywhere including here in the US. I have been privy to a fare share of ridiculous situations in the US and Europe involving non-regular airline travellers and I am sure I am not alone here. Also, airlines all across the world use their fleet to suit the demographics. As said above, for premium customer areas (DEL, BOM or LAX, JFK, SFO, etc in the US) airlines use the better products to attract the premium customers - it's a standard practice and does not in any way mean that the integrity of the aircraft is compromised. My travels to DEL and BOM on foreign airlines in premium cabins have always been pleasant and up to the expectations by western standards. Obviously I don't fly to the second-tier cities in India so cannot comment on the level of airline interior standards. (Although I flew on the fully appointed biz class LH to Pune and that was excellent).

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published