Is A Dine On Demand Concept In Business Class Realistic For All Airlines?

A couple of days ago I wrote about how Cathay Pacific is testing out some improvements to their business class experience, including introducing mattress pads and dine on demand in business class. Initially they’re rolling these out as trials on flights to Chicago and London Gatwick, with the hopes of expanding them to all longhaul flights in the future.

However, apparently the feedback for the dine on demand has been awful… from the cabin crew. No matter what service concept an airline implements, I think the key is that they do so consistently. A service that only works well on half of flights just isn’t worth much, since it doesn’t help manage the expectations of customers, and inevitably leads to disappointment.

So it got me thinking, are Cathay Pacific cabin crew just “lazy,” or is dine on demand not a realistic service expectation in business class?

The more thought I put into it, the more I question the merits of a dine on demand concept (certainly Cathay Pacific cabin crew aren’t lazy). The way I see it, there are a few different airline service concepts when it comes to business class dining:

  • There’s the assembly line approach, where the crew comes through with carts, the service isn’t at all personalized, and you feel like you’re just part of the process (similar to Cathay Pacific’s current service)
  • Slightly better is when airlines don’t use carts, and instead flight attendants bring stuff to you directly on a tray, as it doesn’t block the aisles, and feels a bit more personalized (similar to Emirates’ current service)
  • Even more I prefer when there’s a single flight attendant dedicated to a small area, and they just have to look after 8-12 passengers; as you develop more of a relationship with the flight attendant, service is more personalized, etc. (this is something Lufthansa implemented not too long ago, and it’s quite effective)
  • Then there’s dine on demand, where you can eat what you want when you want (like Etihad and Qatar)


Cathay Pacific’s current “assembly line” service

Even within those categories you have quite a bit of variance. For example, some airlines bring you an entire tray that they plop down in front of you.


Etihad’s current dine on demand concept

Other airlines offer more of a restaurant-style experience, and place everything directly on your tablecloth.


Qatar’s current dine on demand concept

Of course I love when an airline has dine on demand and sets everything directly on your tablecloth. This is what Qatar Airways does, and it’s a great experience… when done correctly. The problem is that sometimes it’s not.

For example, recently I took four Qatar Airways business class flights:

  • On two of the flights, the dine on demand concept was executed flawlessly
  • On one of the flights the service was awful, and the crew was visibly stressed to the point that I felt bad asking them for anything, as they were so frazzled
  • On one of the flights the crew was good, but because of the dine on demand concept everything was really drawn out, and they weren’t as quick as they should have been

Dine on demand is a lot of work. Rather than putting everything in the oven at once and then being done with the service, you work nonstop. The oven is constantly on. You have to keep track of 50 different service flows, rather than the same service flow throughout the cabin. Even from a passenger’s perspective, dine on demand doesn’t come without some downside — if you do want to sleep, the constant noise, light, and smell of food being served the entire flight can cause some people to lose sleep.

I might be contradicting myself here, but I think that dine on demand isn’t for all airlines. Airlines need to have good morale, a good cabin crew to passenger ratio, and motivated and engaged flight attendants to make it work. And even then, it’s really hard work.

Maybe a formal dine on demand program isn’t a great idea for all airlines, though there’s certainly some middle ground:

  • Introduce a more substantial snack menu for passengers who miss the meal
  • Rather than offering a full-on dine on demand, maybe just offer an express meal option for those who miss the main meal services, which at least alleviates some of the workload of bringing out separate courses
  • In the case of Cathay Pacific, at least adopt Lufthansa’s model of having one flight attendant for each little section, and do the service without carts, so it feels a bit less like an assembly line

What do you guys think? Are some airlines better off not offering dine on demand? Is there a happy medium?

Conversations (37)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Johannes Guest

KLM is also testing DOD om longhaul flights. First route is AMS-BKK, to be rolled out for all longhaul flights if proved succesfull. As a FB Platinum can't say I am hopefull this will work.

0
‼ 0
Beth New Member

I did the Cathay dine on demand in business on one of their first tries at it out of Chicago. First, you wouldn't know it was dine on demand because they didn't tell anyone, just went around getting order like usual. Second, I asked for the burger instead of the regular meal and was told that it would take at least an hour to get a burger out. Fair enough. It took over an hour to get my food anyway. I was passed by for clearing multiple time, and I had to ask repeatedly for drinks. None of the FAs seemed to know what they were doing. I would ask for something, wait 45 minutes and not have it come so I laid down to sleep when they came by with multiple courses all at the same time. The FAs were really apologetic and said they were trying to adjust but it just seemed to be all over the place for service.

0
‼ 0
Franz Christian Guest

On flights over 10 hours there is plenty of time for the airline to do a proper service, one course at a time and not on a tray. Even in business-class.

0
‼ 0
VJ Guest

@Jack. There is now a skyteam option to fly sfo-blr with a single stop at AMS with KLM and Jet airways. Jet airways started this route just weeks back. SFO-SIN-BLR has one leg that is disproportionately long. EK operates an A380 on this route while many other US cities only have the 777 with the terrible J seats, so this may be a comfortable option too.

0
‼ 0
Andre Member

I think this article leaves a lot to be desired. Overall, if some airlines are able to execute dine on demand with success a majority of time, there really should be more objective reasons why another airline can't. Maybe passenger to crew ratio, number of daylight hours during a flight during which people will naturally want to eat, maybe the menu is too large, maybe the galley is too small, maybe the crew is just lazy. The article basically asks the question 'is dine on demand for every airline', and instead of providing an analysis on if an airline fits the bill, it questions whether dine on demand is a good concept at all. Please provide additional data on this if you come across it.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published