Delta Air Lines Cuts Most Inflight Service (And Stop Being Ridiculous, People)

We’re seeing airlines make drastic cuts to inflight service. We’ve seen Southwest Airlines suspend all inflight service, and we’ve seen American Airlines suspend most inflight service. Now Delta is joining in as well.

Delta Air Lines inflight service changes

For flights as of today (Wednesday, March 25, 2020), Delta is reducing inflight service. There’s no end date for this new policy, though service is expected to be brought back once the COVID-19 situation stabilizes.

What’s changing to Delta inflight service?

Service changes on flights under 1,000 miles

For Delta Air Lines flights under 1,000 miles, the following will be changing:

  • In economy there will be no service on flights under 350 miles
  • In economy there will be a bottle of water and packaged snack on flights of over 350 miles; there will be no Comfort+ snack basket
  • In first class there will be a bottle of water and packaged snack inflight, and no pre-departure drink or other drink service

Service changes on flights over 1,000 miles

For Delta Air Lines flights of over 1,000 miles, the following will be changing:

  • In economy there will be a bottle of water and packaged snack; there will be no Comfort+ snack basket
  • In first class there will be a bottle of water and Flight Fuel Box, and no pre-departure drink or other drink service

How this compares to American’s policy

Delta is taking an even stricter approach in first class than American. American is still serving meals all at once, while Delta is just serving a packaged snack box in first class. Furthermore, American is serving alcohol and other drinks in first class, while Delta isn’t.

In economy there will at least be a proactive bottled water service on Delta, which isn’t the case on American on flights under 2,200 miles.

Stop being ridiculous, folks

Gets on soap box…

Look, I’ll be the first to hold airlines accountable when they’re being crappy. But this isn’t one of those cases. Reading the comments section of the previous post about American cutting service is leaving me shaking my head:

  • No, flight attendants who are “too chicken to provide normal service” shouldn’t take unpaid leave
  • No, this isn’t an “excuse to cut costs”
  • No, airlines shouldn’t be “reducing the cost of tickets” because of this
  • No, airlines aren’t being “punitive to passengers,” and this isn’t because flight attendants “typically suck on passengers’ leftover ice cubes or nibble on their last pretzels”

Stop being ridiculous, people. You’re being the wrong kind of selfish. I’ll admit I’m being selfish. I’m staying at home and not interacting with anyone because I want this to be over so that life can return to normal.

Maybe some of you aren’t aware of this, but:

  • We currently have a “Level 4” do-not-effing-travel warning, and many places (including where I live) have “shelter-in-place” warnings
  • Nobody should be flying right now unless it’s absolutely essential
  • Airlines are losing literally billions of dollars right now, and they’re even losing money on most of the flights they’re operating
  • Flight attendants are at high risk of getting COVID-19 due to the fact that their job entails doing exactly the opposite of social distancing

Once things are back to normal and if service doesn’t recover, I’ll be right there with you and will call out the airlines.

But if at this very moment your biggest concern is whether you can get some (probably pretty crappy) wine, or that you want airlines to lower a fare in first class by $3.50 because you’re not getting some nasty cheese lasagna or brisket meatloaf, well, I don’t have much to say…

…gets off soap box.

Bottom line

Airlines are cutting inflight service, and that’s the right thing to do. Flight attendants need to be able to take all necessary precautions, and reducing service is part of that.

This really should be a non-issue, since unless you’re traveling for “essential” reasons, you shouldn’t be on a plane. And if you are traveling for essential reasons (because you’re medical staff or whatever), then surely you realize the gravity of the situation, and appreciate this, rather than being bothered by it…

As I said above, if this leads to long term service cuts, let’s cross that bridge when we get there. But this is not the time.

Conversations (96)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Steve Guest

Face it..THE ENTITLED willalways bitch about something..and..they fly to palm beach INFECTED or let their kids go on Spring Break..to INFECT..then run to the HAMPTONS to close them down for the summer. Gotta have my boxed wine

0
‼ 0
Gray Guest

My only objection on Delta's food service is the decision to go water-only (rather than water-or-soda-in-a-can/bottle) in First. The rest of the service change, I totally get, but *that* feels almost punitive. The net impact of offering a bottle of Coke (or Sprite, etc.) versus a bottle of water in terms of infection risk is basically null as far as I can tell (I'd be surprised if they couldn't source similar-sized soda bottles, for example). It stands out because of the load factors on a lot of flights, where lots of folks are going to be getting comped into First *anyway* (and of those who don't, they're as likely as not to end up with a row to themselves), and in doing so seriously undermines the logic of bothering to buy First. Everything else is generally understandable (even if I'd push back on the meal point on flights over about six hours with an eye towards how many airport vendors are actually open in the terminal(s) in question...effectively no meal plus a tight, often once-daily flight at this point can be a bit of a problem), but that particular element has me furrowing a brow.

0
‼ 0
Airport Guest

I've not read all the comments, but have seen a few negative ones. As an airport worker in the UK I continue to go to work daily as an essential worker. I keep myself safe at work by keeping distant from my friends and coworkers. I don't touch my face, I don't eat when I don't have to. I keep myself safe. Yet I still get stuck in traffic. I still have passengers shout in my face. I still get asked for compensation, even when countries have closed their borders. I am not safe. I support our critical health care services because they are on the frontline. I also support the crew on board, as that's my background. They are stuck in the tube with everyone on the flight. And the last one. And the next one. You choose to be on the aircraft. They don't. Be nice to them. Because when you stop choosing to be there, they won't have to be there. You'll be at home. They'll be without a job. They're there for your safety, but they aren't safe. You might not get the service you think you should, but if you get there safe that's all you can ask for.

0
‼ 0
Andrew Todd Guest

I've not read all the comments, but have seen a few negative ones. As an airport worker in the UK I continue to go to work daily as an essential worker. I keep myself safe at work by keeping distant from my friends and coworkers. I don't touch my face, I don't eat when I don't have to. I keep myself safe. Yet I still get stuck in traffic. I still have passengers shout in my face. I still get asked for compensation, even when countries have closed their borders. I am not safe. I support our critical health care services because they are on the frontline. I also support the crew on board, as that's my background. They are stuck in the tube with everyone on the flight. And the last one. And the next one. You choose to be on the aircraft. They don't. Be nice to them. Because when you stop choosing to be there, they won't have to be there. You'll be at home. They'll be without a job. They're there for your safety, but they aren't safe. You might not get the service you think you should, but if you get there safe that's all you can ask for.

0
‼ 0
Ian Guest

I am afraid nothing will ever go back to normal. As such flying will be back to 1962. 10k minimum... each way. Excellent food, amenities. But only for the few rich. It is going the way of General Aviation. 400 planes sold a year, 200 / hr to operate on average and only for wealthy people as toys or business minded schools or providers. Like me. I am a pilot who got lucky to buy myself a Cirrus (with a loan) and doing the hoops and loops for a Part 135 operation i.e on demand air taxi. Guess where I will be? charging 2-3k to people to fly maybe 500 miles regional flights. My niche. Crossing my finger it works but with 2-3 people anyways in those expensive 737s or 320s my capacity may be on par now.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published