US May Require COVID Testing For Domestic Flights

As of this week the US is requiring pre-travel testing for all international travelers arriving in the US. Could this requirement soon be expanded to domestic flights?

COVID-19 testing coming to domestic flights?

Reuters is reporting that the Biden administration is “actively looking” at introducing a coronavirus testing requirement for those flying domestically within the US. This is according to a senior Centers for Disease Control and Prevention official.

When asked about whether we may see a domestic testing requirement, Dr. Marty Cetron said there were “conversations that are ongoing and looking at what the types and locations of testing might be, we’re actively looking at it.”

This follows President Biden last week making it clear that the government is working on “imposing additional public health measures for domestic travel.”

If implemented, I’d guess that the policy would be similar to international flights, where testing is required in the three days leading up to your flight, and a rapid antigen test is sufficient.

Could the US start requiring testing for domestic travel?

My take on coronavirus testing for domestic travel

I’m not sharing this because I’m assuming that it’s a sure bet that this policy will be implemented, but rather I’m sharing it because this is allegedly under consideration, and I figure it’s worth at least talking about. What’s my take on this?

On the most basic level, testing is good. If we could all get tested every day, we’d have the pandemic much more under control, since we’d more easily be able to isolate people who are infected, and also contact trace. Of course testing everyone every day isn’t realistic, or at least is highly unlikely to ever happen.

For context on the scale of testing we’re talking about (this is all very rough math):

  • Based on pulling up some quick data, it looks like on average about one in every 250 people in the US gets tested for coronavirus daily
  • Therefore there are roughly 1.3 million tests administered in the US daily
  • There are on average currently somewhere around 600-800K travelers in the US daily
  • If those numbers stayed the same, about a third of testing in the country would be done for those traveling

The way I view it:

  • Requiring testing for domestic flights would probably significantly harm airlines in terms of reduced passenger demand, but that might not necessarily be a bad thing for the country overall
  • While I don’t think flying as such is that risky (between good air circulation and mask compliance), travel does tend to cause people to interact with more people, be more social, and take more risks than at home
  • Getting a rapid antigen test isn’t exactly a huge barrier to travel, and just like we’ve seen hotels introduce convenient and affordable testing options, there’s no reason the same couldn’t be done for air travel
  • Sometimes I can’t help but wonder if testing in this context is almost a bad thing in terms of how it impacts behavior; many people incorrectly assume that because they tested negative at some point that they are “safe” and can take more risks, and that almost seems more dangerous as someone heads out on vacation

So yeah, that’s why I don’t have a strong take here one way or another.

This policy would cause the demand for air travel to decrease

Bottom line

The Biden administration is looking into requiring pre-travel testing for domestic flights. This follows a similar policy being introduced for international flights as of this week. I’ll be curious to see what comes of this, as I can see both sides.

On the one hand, more testing is good, and this may discourage people from flying. On the other hand, this would probably have a negative impact on airlines, and I have to wonder if this kind of a testing requirement could be more useful elsewhere.

What do you make of the prospect of the US requiring pre-travel testing for domestic flights?

Conversations (83)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

AdamW Member

Look beyond the impact on airlines and think about the economic impact on the medical providers; payers & insurance companies; and the labs that run the tests. While tests should be readily available, and ideally point of care; the reality is that most people call or message their doctors office for help. My group is overrun with every patient traveling to Hawaii, or internationally, and wanting us to manage their testing for their vacation! Seriously, why would people think that I know the testing requirements to visit Thailand; and why should I be responsible for arranging this? So, we end up spending significant time providing guidance in something that has nothing to do with actual healthcare. This alone is keeping the sick from getting care. On top of that, the patient expects their insurance, or anyone for that matter, to cover the cost associated with personal travel, which the person shouldn’t probably be undertaking in the first place. To be clear, testing is a good thing! Telling all 331 million people to “contact your health care provider to obtain testing,” or even implying to do so, is a fucking disaster! It already is a disaster with just Hawaii and international travel...now let’s add ALL travel. This could be the thing that breaks the system.

0
‼ 0
Dan Guest

I do not agree with this policy. It will be damaging to the travel industry. I believe they need to first figure out how to roll out rapid antigen tests < 5 minutes, and then find ways to make it inexpensive and easy to distribute. Without having quick antigen testing, and easy rollout and distribution of tests, instituting and enforcing mandatory traditional 72hr PCR tests is impractical and can be damaging to the travel industry.

0
‼ 0
Tim Guest

I can't even get a test in my area that gets results back in 72 hours. If something like this is going to be instituted, then I think it'd have to be the rapid antigen tests (15 minutes), it'd have to be affordable ($25 or less), and it'd have to be available at all airports. Testing requirement waived with proof of vaccine. THAT would be doable. Anything else....you're looking at the annihilation of travel industries.

0
‼ 0
platy Guest

@ Marcus I've heard all of the right wing brain washing narrative before, mate. It's very boring stuff, so save me the stupidity. Strange that the Liberal premiers in TAS and SA escape your attention, despite pursuing similar policies to those of Labor in QLD. Then there's the inconvenient issue of the QLD election win. Clearly the people backed the sensible choice. Not feckless Deb who'd have opened the borders. I live in Cairns - even here, with a reliance on tourism, people still voted with a swing away from the loopy Liberals and numbskull Nationals. And the fact that VIC premier has enjoyed stunning popularity. Of course NSW is a special case. The Ruby Princess debacle led to the death from COVID of the brother of a friend of mine. NSW Premier has lost the plot. It's only a matter of time before her corruption will scupper her. Shredded documents. Doing the business with a corrupt colleague. No wonder the federal Liberal and National parties don't want an effective independent corruption body.

0
‼ 0
platy Guest

@ Patti Nobody here is hiding in fear, thanks all the same for your misplaced stupidity. It's called taking responsibility. It's about respecting the health and welfare of others in your local, national, and international communities, people who you can potentially infect with your blatantly selfish unfettered wunderlust. Unfortunately, rules are necessary because some folk resolutely refuse to behave like decent human beings at a time of evident world crisis. You don't want to be bothered to respect other people, so come up with all sorts of excuses to deny reality. Absent the intelligence to summon a cogent excuse, you default to a shallow and childish comment about people hiding in fear. Your attitude and behaviour are appalling. To have any concern whatsoever that you could spread the virus and kill other people? Or do you just not give a kcuf?

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published

Keep Exploring OMAAT