World Of Hyatt & MG...
 

World Of Hyatt & MGM Rewards Partnership Ending

61 Posts
10 Users
0 Reactions
216 Views
Posts: 39916
Admin
Topic starter
(@lucky)
Member
Joined: 13 years ago
[#15199]
wpf-cross-image

Ugh, this is unfortunate for World of Hyatt members…

Continue reading: World Of Hyatt & MGM Rewards Partnership Ending

Share your questions, experiences, and thoughts below.


60 Replies
60 Replies
Diamond
(@travelinwilly)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 2583

Well, on the plus side, the Hyatt Place Las Vegas is one of the few (only?) Las Vegas properties of *any* brand that doesn't charge the robbery fees...I mean "resort" fees.


Reply
(@keitherson)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 396

What a shame for the properties of Luxor and Excalibur, which seemed to be extremely popular for a certain segment of Hyatt elites.


Reply
(@travelnok)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 1

small point of clarification here: the Rio is not on the Las Vegas Strip.

that said, i am bummed this partnership is ending. but i was more bummed that top tier MGM patrons couldn't match to Globalist.


Reply
 Mudd
(@Mudd)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 14

Doesn't Hyatt also own Dream Hotels?
There is one being built on south end of the strip and all construction was stopped completely...something about no money. I'm not sure if that plays into this decision...

So how I'm gonna get my explorist now?


Reply
(@ORDnHKG)
Joined: 17 years ago

Posts: 93

There are only two Hyatt place in Vegas, one is near Virgin which is a Curio with hilton, FAR off strip, not walking distance, the other Hyatt place is at Silverton, way south of the strip, mid way to south point. Sure neither charge resort fee, but if you check their room rates, they are constantly in the range of $150-$200/night even midweek off season in January, using points are not ideal neither since both are cat 3 properties. There are actually a casino royale on the center strip which is a best western with no resort fee, but same thing like Hyatt place, high regular rate in the $150 range


Reply
Diamond
(@frank-b)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 147

With MGM buying Cosmopolitan last year, they already have a Marriott resort.


Reply
(@j-rod)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 1

I have a tiny datapoint on this... I do a pretty high spend yearly at MGM properties on rooms / food.. but zero at gambling. Last year after my spend points got matched from my MGM account to Hyatt. When MGM then did their match of status this year early in February I got bumped to Noir status (highest). Feels like a bit of a loophole as Noir is invite only, especially since I didn't get all of the Noir benefits as my gaming spend was nothing. My status last year on MGM was gold... due to other casino status match. My status on Hyatt was explorist.


Reply
(@Gary Leff)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 369

1. MGM was unhappy with the partnership before Hyatt acquired Dream (which includes a Las Vegas property)

2. Rio alone wasn't gong to end the deal, but it did focus more attention on the World of Hyatt deal at MGM.

3. The partnership has already been successively devalued, no longer tier matching as generously and eliminating some double dipping.

The partnership is a decade old. MGM's strategy changed, they had moving from gaming to filling rooms with all kinds of leisure travelers (making a mainstream chain partnership perfect) and now more back to gaming.

The good news is that between the Rio project and the Dream project we'll get a pretty good presence from Hyatt in Vegas. More competition is good!


Reply
(@Ceejay)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 20

I personally think the partnership was too 1-sided. Getting matched to MGM was a huge benefit and hard to get on its own


Reply
 JC
(@JC)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 47

I matched MGM Gold to Hyatt Explorist a few weeks back and i currently have status through February 28, 2025. Does this mean that come September when the partnership ends, my status will expire in 2024 instead of 2025?


Reply
(@the MSer)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 1

After seeing more and more people abuse "virtual" stay at MGM to "fake" their Globalist status, I'm not surprised by this move made by Hyatt.


Reply
 Tom
(@Tom)
Joined: 14 years ago

Posts: 8

What recent news that I’ve seen out there regarding the Rio has said nothing one way or the other about Hyatt …. Personally I’ll be surprised if it ends up a Hyatt. I hope this is not the case.

I have little interest in staying at MGM properties once the hyatt relationship ends and certain the tier matching globalist to Mgm gold.


Reply
 John
(@John)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 37

Booked a Bellagio stay a few months ago in October thinking one day this was probably going to end. Glad I did it. Always wanted to stay there and it was only other 10K for the entire stay above the Park MGM. Probably going to be my last personal trip to Vegas. Friend of mine lives there will be moving at the end of the year, so my reasons to visit will be gone.


Reply
(@alonzo)
Joined: 5 years ago

Posts: 866

Wow, that's a sizeable loss. Can't wait to hear what caused this.


Reply
(@Matt Semenza)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 1

Huge news! Hyatt is the ONLY reason I stay at MGM properties! Amazed at the lack of warning. Did I miss the Hyatt email announcements?


Reply
(@KuBear)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 27

I think this is most likely Hyatt's decision. They want to filter out the fake Globalist members.


Reply
(@King Points)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 1

Does this mean the status matching will end on July 14th?


Reply
(@steve-from-la)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Devastating. They were always good for a mattress run.


Reply
 Tom
(@Tom)
Joined: 4 years ago

Posts: 2

I got the email from Hyatt about 15 mins ago


Reply
(@Eskimo)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 6156

This is the way.


Reply
(@David)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 1

anyone know if virtual check in/out was allowed?


Reply
Diamond
(@creditcrunch)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 648

Hyatt are building a new hotel on the Strip (Dream Las Vegas) albeit dogged with delays a symptom of building new properties in Vegas. I wager this is another motive for the separation


Reply
Diamond
(@frances-price)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 36

That's my question too. I matched to Hyatt Explorist on March 1, and my Hyatt account says my status is value through Feb 28, 2025.


Reply
Diamond
(@frances-price)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 36

*valid


Reply
 John
(@John)
Joined: 13 years ago

Posts: 25

The best part about this was waiving of resort fees.


Reply
 BigG
(@BigG)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 68

I earned Globalist status through MGM and I mean earn as I reach the 20 k spend for the most part through mgm rooms etc . As a Canadian this is really the only meaningful way to earn Hyatt points which are super valuable . Will hit 20 k in a couple of weeks so one more year globalist and will always have my mgm status. I have been loyal to Hyatt because of this but now it doesn’t matter . Other issue is that I’m over 700k for lifetime globalist so 2 more years and would have been lifetime globalist . This sucks big time .


Reply
 Dale
(@Dale)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 1

Such a bummer, you already can’t book MGM through Hyatt app, so it looks like it’s implemented. Such a bummer I should’ve booked last week when I was looking.


Reply
(@James S)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 361

There has been no construction done to the Rio. It is open but if you look up recent YouTube reviews it has been abandoned by management. Not a penny in maintenance or upkeep in years.

Caesars still runs it but doesn't care


Reply
(@eponymous coward)
Joined: 16 years ago

Posts: 445

You have a ton of travel hackers getting cheap Excalibur/Luxor/Circus Circus rooms to do cheap mattress runs for Globalist. No resort fees charged if you've matched status to Explorist (there was a way to hack the Bilt promo for this if you matched in person) or Globalist or have it already. This kills RevPAR and since a mattress runner isn't going to spend money in the casino anywhere it's not really helping MGM's bottom line much.

I always thought this partnership was on borrowed time once MGM waived resort fees for Gold+ and made it super attractive to get, just like how Caesars Diamond/Wyndham Diamond status matching eventually got pared back. There are just too many Hyatt junkies who would run over their grandma to requalify for Globalist (and general travel hackers) for this to be sustainable, plus all the casino status match deals are getting nice red arrows and maps with detailed directions on how to exploit them... and are all getting shut down for this exact reason. MGM Gold is one of the major onramps to getting free cruises and casino status matches, incidentally...


Reply
 Mudd
(@Mudd)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 14

For all those commenting about Rio - it's true that it is a third-world dump.
I see no construction there. No remodel. In fact 2 weeks ago an NVE transformer blew up, the infrastructure was so old. Stay away. I had comp nights and I was scared to walk inside.


Reply
 Mudd
(@Mudd)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 14

I swear I logged in to Hyatt and I saw my Explorist would expire in Feb 2024.
So I matched just now MGM > Hyatt
Now it says I expire Feb 2025. Will Hyatt honor this? I took a screenshot.
MATCH BEFORE THE LINK GOES AWAY

Log into your MGM first
Then go here if you can figure out where to put the dot HTML:

https://www.mgmresorts.com/en/mgm-rewards/preferred-partners/hyatt-hotels


Reply
Diamond
(@benjaminguttery)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 585

There is going to be ALOT less "Globalists" after this change. Bahahahahahaha! Have fun actually staying in Hyatt Places and Old AF Regencys!


Reply
Diamond
(@benjaminguttery)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 585

The Dream is going to be SMALL and expensive compared to what all these Hyatt whiners are used to paying. Oh, plus they will have to actually pay a resort fee for once. Also I guarantee that 1 small hotel on the horizon is not the reason why a deal with a dozen+ properties and tens of thousands of rooms got canned.


Reply
Diamond
(@benjaminguttery)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 585
Diamond
(@benjaminguttery)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 585

It 1000% was that people were doing mattress runs to earn Globalist and in doing that is causing the ranks to swell (and not with actual big spenders). Then to a minor degree that empty rooms don't increase revenue for the casinos, they weren't even getting the resort fees (which is most of Vegas properties profit).


Reply
Diamond
(@benjaminguttery)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 585

Agreed. If they would have changed the relationship, people would have wined even more. Better to just cut losses, and I'm 1000% positive that BOTH companies lost money/revenue/profit through this partnership.


Reply
Diamond
(@benjaminguttery)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 585

Dream & Rio are both WAYYYYY down the horizon. I highly doubt people will choose to stay at a Hyatt Place WAYYY off The Strip until then. Spend will shift to Hilton, Marriott, and the Casinos until then.


Reply
Diamond
(@benjaminguttery)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 585

THANK YOU FOR SAYING THAT! Just shows how many fools were doing "virtual mattress runs" and not even staying in Vegas. Rio is not centrally located or neat anything of note. Have fun being on an island in the middle of a neighborhood in a desolate desert with absolutely nothing within walking distance!!!


Reply
Diamond
(@benjaminguttery)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 585

I chuckled so hard at this statement! YES!!! So many snooty "Globalists" that probably have $2k in spend a year from staying at dumps like these. The herd will be thinned out after this year!!!


Reply
Diamond
(@benjaminguttery)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 585

Thank You ORDinHKG for educating these fools! NO ONE will ever stay at these Hyatts over something closer to the strip. Even if Your there for a convention, much more convenient properties around the city. Hyatt is effectively DEAD IN THE WATER in LV until the Dream gets funding again (good luck in this environment) or the Rio actually starts construction (thinking it also has to do with securing funding at a rate everyone can swallow). Bye FAKE Globalists!!!


Reply
Diamond
(@benjaminguttery)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 585

Matt, why would You expect notice? So Hyatt could give You amd thousands of others more chances to do virtual mattress runs and tie up their inventory and elite ranks with quackery? No thanks. I actually appreciate this no notice change for once.


Reply
(@Crazy eponymous)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 1

Hyatt junkies that would run over their grandma? Wtf, projection much?


Reply
(@yepnope)
Joined: 4 years ago

Posts: 11

Well this is terrible. It sucks for those chasing globalist and those that just don’t want to get screwed by fees when going to Vegas.


Reply
(@Jack Tripper)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 1

Is there any way to possibly keep MGM Rewards status by creating a cruise line account, getting lifetime cruise line status by matching from MGM, and using the cruise line status in future years to keep bumping up the MGM status?


Reply
 Trey
(@Trey)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 65

Goodness, you're enjoying this a bit too much... not sure whether to feel sorry for you or be scared of you...


Reply
(@Justin)
Joined: 5 years ago

Posts: 32

As someone who is in Vegas once or twice a year and is globalist this has pros and cons. Pro is I'm not (as) loyal to MGM anymore so will likely reunite with my old favorite, The Palazzo. Free valet parking and waived resort fees for the last year was too good to be true, saved $100/night at Aria and Vdara, usually the only properties I'd frequent. I guess I'm not surprised it's ending, but would have preferred to just change the benefits (such as min $$ for Hyatt night credit - pushing people into higher end resorts with more expensive restaurants etc.), although people probably would have bitched about that even more. I do suspect this was because so many people were getting super cheap night credits which isn't profitable for either end. Too bad they couldn't just close that loophole.


Reply
(@steve-from-la)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Most of the MGM properties allowed virtual check in and check out. But I believe the fine print indicated that you had to visit the front desk to get resort fees waived. It might have also been the same if you wanted Hyatt credit for the nights. Not sure how strictly the front desk visit was enforced.


Reply
(@steve-from-la)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

I want to cry. While it wasn't profitable for MGM of Hyatt, it sure was for me. Some of the offers were too good to be true.

4 free nights at the Park or the MGM Grand. A 5th night for $10-$20 usually. Granted those hotels are average at best and the offers were usually Sunday night till Friday morning. But the offers usually came with $25 in free play and a $50 room credit that could be used at any MGM associated restaurant. Add on the waived resort fees and free parking, it was almost criminal not to take advantage of the deal.

It just took some discipline not to gamble away the savings. I'm gonna miss those free Hyatt credit nights. C'est la vie. All good things must end eventually.... I'm also going to have to find another way to get cheap segment credits on Alaska now.


Reply
 Tom
(@Tom)
Joined: 14 years ago

Posts: 8

Now we’ll just have to content with all the BILT WoH globalist lites with all the MGM Mattress runners going bye bye.


Reply
 Tom
(@Tom)
Joined: 14 years ago

Posts: 8

Only to be replaced by the glut of BILT Globalists ….


Reply
Diamond
(@benjaminguttery)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 585

Kool + snazzy comment Trey. You must be one of those Hyatt whiners. Like I said: Have fun actually staying at basic and old properties!


Reply
 John
(@John)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 1

This sucks. I just completed over 100 free nights at MGM Las Vegas properties , this year. I guess the ride is over!!!!


Reply
 Trey
(@Trey)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 65

I saw your original comment. I’ve stayed in plenty of “basic” and “old” properties. I live in the Midwest, we have plenty of them. And they did the job. In some cases they were even a lifesaver.

But hey, continue to be arrogant and condescending, I’m sure that’s won you many friends.


Reply
Diamond
(@steve-5)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

No i would concur with this sentiment as a fellow globalist. Sorry grandma


Reply
Diamond
(@benjaminguttery)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 585

LOL! My comment(s) were actually meant for and aimed at the type of people your accusing me of being! In my experience, alot of the "Hyatt Fanboys" on this site talk down to people like me who stay at Marriotts & IHG's often. I was poking fun at THOSE snobs and giving them a taste of their own medicine since they always talk down to Bonvoy members and the like. I'm still laughing my rear off about it too!


Reply
 Mina
(@Mina)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 1

Nope you have to earn the cruise line status. They don’t status match from MGM.


Reply
Diamond
(@benjaminguttery)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 585

LOL! Trey, my comment(s) were actually meant for and aimed at the type of people your accusing me of being like! In my experience, a lot of the "Hyatt Fanboys" on this site talk down to people like me who stay at Marriotts & IHG's often. I was poking fun at THOSE snobs and giving them a taste of their own medicine since they always talk down to Bonvoy members and the like. I'm still laughing my rear off about it too! Lord know I've stayed at many humble properties as well.


Reply
(@GSHLGB)
Joined: 13 years ago

Posts: 81

Absolutely - I have 35 MGM nights this year.

Check in while still in Los Angeles, Drive to LV, use my phone as a key...

Check out from my phone from the car on my way home


Reply
 Mike
(@Mike)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 1

You know years ago Hyatt had a footprint in Atlantic City at Ocean Casino as one of its portfolio resorts and that lasted around maybe 2 years. At the time I stayed there and realized as a Hyatt member I wonder how MGM (Borgata) felt about this since it wasn’t common for Hyatt to associate with another casino and they had an agreement with MGM! I bet that didn’t make MGM happy at the time.


Reply
(@destruya)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 36

The BILT Globalists probably actually stayed at properties, and 20 qualifying nights in three months' time is arguably less forgiving than 60 in 12 months' time.


Reply