British Airways Updates Executive Club Terms, Adds Class Action Waiver & Arbitration Agreement

British Airways has today updated the terms of the Executive Club frequent flyer program, and I think some people might find this change to be interesting.

British Airways’ new class action lawsuit clause

British Airways has updated sections 33 and 34 of the Executive Club terms & conditions, and this impacts members who are residents in the United States and Canada.

Let’s take a brief look at what’s changing, and then below I’ll share why it’s noteworthy.

British Airways is adding some new Executive Club terms

Section 33: class action lawsuits

With the addition of section 33:

  • Residents of the USA and Canada agree that the resolution of any dispute shall be conducted on an individual basis, and not a class-wide basis
  • No such proceeding may be consolidated with any other legal proceedings involving British Airways or any other person
  • You agree that you will not be a class representative, class member, or otherwise participate in a class, representative, consolidated, or private attorney general proceeding against British Airways

Section 34: dispute resolution & arbitration agreement 

With the addition of section 34:

  • All disputes arising from or relating to terms and conditions shall be resolved in binding arbitration, rather than in a court by a judge or jury
  • The party seeking relief shall serve a demand for arbitration within a reasonable time after the dispute has arisen, in no event more than two years from when the aggrieved party knew or should have known the dispute

Why the sudden change in terms?

In mid-2018, British Airways faced a huge class action lawsuit related to fuel surcharges. The lawsuit alleged that there was no correlation between British Airways fuel surcharges on award tickets and the cost of fuel, and that this breached the Executive Club terms.

This settlement included all US Executive Club members who redeemed Avios for award tickets between November 9, 2006, and April 17, 2013, and who paid British Airways imposed fuel surcharges.

This class action lawsuit involved a total of $42 million in settlement compensation, plus over 2.2 billion Avios (those involved could choose whether they wanted cash or Avios compensation).

I’m not sure if there have been other cases since then, but clearly this is intended to address these kinds of class action lawsuits (both in terms of the ability for class action lawsuits, and also in terms of limiting how far back people can go with these claims).

British Airways faced a big class action lawsuit over fuel surcharges

Bottom line

You’ve gotta love British Airways adding an arbitration agreement and class action waiver during a pandemic. The airline informing members of this starts with “we hope you and your family are keeping well during these tough times.” And then they inform us of this.

Nice.

(Tip of the hat to @istrakhov)

Conversations (33)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Journeying John Guest

IF Ba had looked after customers data and not ripped off / overcharged for 'taxes and extras" on redemption flights, this would be a non issue. Attempting to introduce policies and unilateral agreements to enable them to continue to overcharge and nickel and dime at every opportunity (though that should probably be dollar and dime given the scale of the charges) the answer is simple. Vote with your bookings. Why would anyone choose BA given their attitude to customers and staff; Cabin cleaning and maintenance; Customer service and extra charges? No longer 'BA - to fly to serve' but: SpanglishQatari Airways, the shareholders airline. Profiteering from your misery, by design.

0
‼ 0
Anthony Nicol Guest

I phoned BA and got through quite quickly. I asked for a refund d for my upcoming flights in June. They refunded my costs and returned my a avios points. Money was paid into bank within 2 days. Unfortunately a previous flight was vouchered

0
‼ 0
MYSELF Guest

Gotta love BA. They're going to find themselves in a class action lawsuit about trying to restrict consumers rights to partake in - a class action lawsuit! God help us all. They truly are gunning for the "worst airline in the world" award aren't they.

0
‼ 0
Steve Member

@Ben nice catch. Assuming the DOT regulation is still in force I don't see how they can make this stick. In addition arbitration is always voluntary. It cannot be imposed unilaterally, which is why the language about agreeing. So anyone with a problem could sue now before making any bookings.

0
‼ 0
Paul Guest

Their customer management and communication are awful. They are the only major one world carrier which has not extended status thru 2021 and now they come out with this. Incompetent and clearly in serious financial difficulty. in addition this phrase in the new class action requirement "to the extent permissible by local law or regulation," is doing a lot of work

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published