American Airlines Cracking Down On Hidden City Ticketing?

American Airlines’ corporate security department seems to have a bit of time on its hands at the moment, which shouldn’t come as much of a surprise. A FlyerTalk member shares an interesting letter he just received regarding hidden city ticketing.

Some of you may remember that American’s corporate security department was in the news a while back for shutting down AAdvantage accounts over Citi credit card applications.

American identifies 52 cases of hidden city ticketing

A FlyerTalk member has shared a letter he received from American’s corporate security department. I’m not suggesting this is necessarily part of any widespread crackdown on this practice, though it may be. Regardless, I figure it’s an interesting data point.

This person is an American AAdvantage Executive Platinum member, has lifetime status, and currently has 600,000 redeemable AAdvantage miles.

It would appear that the member was engaged in quite a bit of hidden city ticketing, as the airline identified at least 52 cases of this. The airline is “only” asking for $2,500, which seems reasonable, frankly (that’s less than $50 per incident, potentially significantly less than the fare difference would have been).

The letter reads as follows:

As an analyst with American Airlines, one of my responsibilities is investigating violations of the General AAdvantage® Program Conditions. An audit of your AAdvantage account, determined that you have engaged in the practice known as ‘Hidden City ticketing’; the purchase of a fare to a point beyond your actual destination. Hidden city ticketing is explicitly defined in AA’s Conditions of Carriage as a violation of ticket validity. The Terms and Conditions of the AAdvantage program further state that compliance with the Conditions of Carriage is compulsory for participation in the AAdvantage program. As such, AAdvantage account XXXXXX is restricted, pending the outcome of our investigation. You may review the terms and conditions of the AAdvantage ® program (several parts of the terms and conditions are noted below) by clicking the link below or by copying and pasting it into your browser.

The audit of your account was completed on August xx, 2020. The following reservations were not issued in compliance with the AAdvantage Terms & Conditions, Conditions of Carriage or AA.com Site Usage policy:

52 HIDDEN CITY TICKETS (Included each one of the flights they believe is a hidden city ticket)

Not unlike other commodities, airline seats are market priced. A seat on a non-stop flight is a premium product and commands a higher price. Seats in connecting markets must be priced competitively and hence can be substantially cheaper. The ill-effects of point beyond ticketing are two-fold; the customer receives the flight for a price for which they aren’t entitled and a seat is spoiled on the separate connecting flight. An airline ticket constitutes a contract and the terms of that contract are stated explicitly in the Conditions of Carriage. Please see excerpts below.

These actions have resulted in clear and considerable losses to American Airlines. In addition to our loss for the travel provided, tickets booked through prohibited practices are considered fraudulent, and therefore not eligible to accrue mileage. In this case, our loss is further compounded through the Elite mileage accruals, benefits, and services used that were not otherwise available. Generally, violations of this nature subject the AAdvantage account to termination. However, we are willing to provide you with an opportunity to restore an equitable relationship through restitution for the loss on your identified travel.

You may respond to this message by 3pm, CST, Friday, August 31, 2020 stating you would like to bring your account back to good standing. At that time, the segments will be re-priced based on your intended travel and we will send you the information so that you may make the appropriate reimbursement for the travel provided. Failure to return the account to good standing or to reply, will result in the termination of your AAdvantage® membership and all its benefits, including all remaining AAdvantage® miles in your account and any award tickets issued from it.

American Airlines has rules against hidden city ticketing

What is hidden city ticketing?

Just to go into a bit more detail on what hidden city ticketing actually is…

Airline pricing can be incredibly complex, and often consumers can’t make sense of it. That’s because airlines price airfare not based on the cost of providing it, but rather based on what they think consumers are willing to pay.

That’s why a longer flight may be significantly less expensive than a shorter flight, and why a connecting itinerary may be significantly cheaper than a nonstop itinerary. This most commonly comes in the form of nonstop flights being priced at a premium, since people value the convenience of that.

Let me give an example, even though at the moment airfare is pretty cheap across the board.

A nonstop one-way flight from Miami to Charlotte costs $105.

Meanwhile if you fly from Miami to Raleigh via Charlotte (with the same Miami to Charlotte flight) you’d pay just $54.

The practice of hidden city ticketing would be to book the ticket all the way to Raleigh, but then get off the plane in Charlotte.

Now, there are some things to be aware of:

  • For most airlines this violates the contract of carriage, though it isn’t illegal
  • There are some risks associated with this in the event of irregular operations, if you’re checking a bag, etc.; you can read more about that here

Nonstop flights are often priced at a premium over connecting itineraries

Bottom line

It’s always interesting to see what’s going on at airline corporate security departments, since this kind of stuff isn’t often made public. American Airlines seems to have just sent a letter to someone who engaged in hidden city ticketing 52 times, requesting $2,500.

American may or may not be cracking down on this on a larger scale — we don’t know — but regardless this is an interesting anecdote.

Generally speaking engaging in hidden city ticketing once or twice won’t set off any alarms (though United has told gate agents to report suspected cases of hidden city ticketing), while doing it dozens of times absolutely will trigger something, as we’re seeing here.

Conversations (70)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

3bettins Guest

Ticket prices are determined by many things, one of the most important being competition. So if you are ticketed to a city that has strong competition then the fare may be lower. If your hidden city has not much competition, perhaps a hub, then the airline can charge more, can't they? They base their fares on the market, just like any business, and they are allowed to do that. For the people that are saying the airline hasn't lost any money, that is incorrect. They lost the opportunity to sell that seat at the higher, correct fare. Whether you like it or not, they get to say what that cost is. You are stealing the difference in fares, plain and simple.

0
‼ 0
john Guest

I do not understand what is the problem and the Arline is getting revenue either if the seat is empty or if it is taken, The airine has already been pad for the seat at the price that they airline dictated. Not a good argument from the airline's perspective. Just like change fees, how does the ariline lose money, if they keep your money in "space" and let you change for free as Southwest does, they are getting the price that they asked for for that particular ticket.

0
‼ 0
Charlie Guest

@Joey, What kind of company allows its employees to fly from ORD to PHX with an overnight stay so they can join their colleague on a morning flight from PHX to SFO? You'd have been fired for that stunt if you had worked for me.

0
‼ 0
Azamaraal Diamond

@Otavio You cannot fight AA in court over the T&C of their frequent flyer plan as it states clearly that they can do whatever they want to do and cancel you for any reason whatsoever. The court that will convince them is walking away. I still think they will be a loser on this one if the FF has actually given them enough business to become Platinum Lifetime. Just depends. These days nobody loves AA so it is a difficult decision as to whether the lifetime benefits are worth paying the RANSOM. For the foreseeable future I suspect not bothering is the best outcome for the FF - but it's a crap shoot either way. Odds are that he will be blackballed by AA so that any time he wants a perk in the future even as a lifetime Platinum he may find that "nothing available" is his constant answer. The fact that they didn't start with a warning is odd to me. Perhaps there is more to this than has been exposed to the light.

0
‼ 0
Erika Harrison Guest

How is this a problem for the airline company? They charged an amount for a flight (including all legs of the flight) and received the amount they requested. And since it is common practice for airlines to overbook flights by 10%, they were mostly likely able to book a standby passenger on the leg that the original ticket holder skipped. So the airline actually made more money than they had anticipated receiving for the transaction. It's like a grocery store trying to fine a customer who purchased an item that was BOGO but they didn't take the free item. It's not illegal and they can't sue the passenger because the law will only make you "whole" in a judgement. The airline is often profiting when someone does this, not losing money. If their argument is that they could have made more money if the customer would have chosen the higher priced ticket for the direct flight, then they need to reassess their ticket pricing practices.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published