Air New Zealand Refunds Passengers After Severe Turbulence

If you fly regularly, you’ve probably experienced significant turbulence before.

I notice it the most when ascending or descending through clouds, and it’s usually over quickly. Even though I’ve taken hundreds of flights without incident, the experience always worries me briefly as some unexpected bumps remind me that I’m in a metal tube hurtling through the air.

But I’ve never had turbulence bad enough to put me off taking the next flight (as unfortunately I remember happening to Ben many years ago), and pilot is usually great at keeping the cabin calm and explaining the situation.

And no matter how bad the turbulence is, it is not the airline’s fault when mother nature decides the flight will be bumpy.

Passengers on a domestic Air New Zealand flight on Wednesday had an unusually rough ride. This happened on flight NZ5715 between Christchurch and Invercargill, when a small  AT72 propeller plane hit 180 km/hour (~111 miles/hour) cross winds.

This lasted most of the (admittedly short) flight, but especially on descent/landing.

Many passengers were physically ill, with around 20% of them vomiting during the flight, but praised the pilots and crew for their professionalism throughout the experience. The airline arranged for emergency services to meet the plane upon the (safe) landing at Invercargill for any passengers still feeling unwell.

I was surprised to see that Air New Zealand has actually gone as far as to fully refund each passenger the cost of their ticket, sending all passengers the following email:

As you will be aware, on approach to Invercargill Airport the aircraft experienced strong turbulence which is likely to have caused some discomfort to you and your passengers.

On landing you would have noticed emergency services were on hand to provide assistance as a number of customers were feeling unwell. In recognition of your experience, a full refund of this flight will be processed.

Bottom line

If I had been on this flight I might have felt like death after landing, but assuming the crew and pilots advised passengers of the expected flight conditions (as it seems they did here) I certainly wouldn’t be looking to the airline for a refund.

Aside from cancelling the flight (which may have angered passengers who did not appreciate the conditions the flight would operate in), the airline did the best they could in the circumstances and did not need to go as far as to refund the passengers for a freak weather event.

But it was certainly a nice gesture that they did and I applaud the airline for going above and beyond like this.

I’m hesitant to ask, because I don’t want to scare anyone off flying, but what is the worst conditions you have flown through?

(Featured image courtesy of XPinger)

Conversations (40)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

LongWayAround Guest

James, I don't completely agree with you that "no matter how bad the turbulence is, it is not the airline’s fault when mother nature decides the flight will be bumpy". Each flight number has an "ideal" route but each time before a flight, the airlines calculate the most cost effective route given the weather conditions, and this determines the fuel load etc, and this is how a captain can usually tell you the accurate expected flight time, down to the minute, before each take-off. The problem is when planning around turbulent-likely weather. There are threshold for basic safety which no one wants to break, for obvious reasons. But airlines do need choose what is an acceptable level of strong-yet-safe turbulence. At what point does an airline decide to avoid an area of weather that is likely to produce significant turbulence (yet safe), and pay more fuel money for a longer route to avoid that patch of weather? I completely agree that in some cases turbulence cannot be predicted or avoided, and that we all need to accept that hurtling through the lower stratosphere at 900kmph in a tin can will inevitably have some turbulence, however we do need to question the equations that airlines use in the comfort vs savings scale when it comes to flight plans.

0
‼ 0
Garry Margolis New Member

In 1970, I flew from HKG to NRT on a JAL stretch DC-8. I was near the front of the aircraft and the toilets were all in the rear, so it was a bit of a hike to get to and from them. The meals on that flight were served from front to back. After my tray was collected, I went to a toilet, squeezing past service carts that were providing meals. While I was in there, the seat belt sign went on. I finished up, and a woman hurriedly pushed past me into it as I opened the door. I was heading back to my seat when massive turbulence suddenly struck. Food was flying everywhere and people were screaming. I was next to the galley and curled into a ball, grabbing something for stability. The flight attendants in the galley were doing an amazing aerial ballet, holding on with one hand while slamming cupboard doors with their other hands and their feet. I was finally able to pull myself into an empty seat next to the galley and strap myself in. One thought struck me: I wonder what happened to the woman who was in such a hurry to get into the toilet... A few years later, traveling from LAX to AKL with a stop in PPT on an Air New Zealand DC-10, there was literally continuous turbulence (albeit not as violent) through both flight segments. It was an overnight flight and seemed like one of the longest flights I've ever taken. There were occasional screams when things got pretty rough, and the cabin ceiling panels were flexing. When we finally landed in AKL after what felt like an eternity, one of the cabin stewards ran up an aisle, yelling, "We made it! Thank God we made it!" The white-knuckle passengers were noticeably disturbed, but I noticed the smile on his face and was able to laugh about it.

0
‼ 0
Francis C. Bagbey Guest

Check out air turbulence videos on YouTube. Pretty fun to watch since we are not going through it!

0
‼ 0
William Member

It blows my mind that Bens worst flight was over 5 years ago. I remember him going through that experience and then staying on the ground in Seattle for a little while since he was still shaken up. Man time flies.

0
‼ 0
Eskimo Guest

ATR in a 100 kts crosswind!!! I find that hard to believe pilots will want to fly in those conditions. They are all lucky to be alive.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member