Since 2017, we’ve known about Qantas’ “Project Sunrise” concept, whereby the airline will fly from Sydney to both London (LHR) and New York (JFK), using special Airbus A350-1000ULR aircraft. These will be the world’s longest flights, and will see passengers spending nearly an entire day on an aircraft without stopping.
We’re finally getting closer to these routes actually commencing. A few months ago, Qantas announced it would launch nonstop Sydney to London flights as of October 2027, with flights going on sale as of February 2027. The airline has now also announced when we’ll see the launch of nonstop New York flights… though we’ll have to be patient for around two more years.
Qantas’ record breaking Sydney to New York flights unveiled
Qantas has announced that it plans to launch nonstop flights between Sydney and New York as of mid-2028, with flights going on sale as of August 2027. This will represent the first-ever regularly scheduled nonstop flights between Australia and New York.

Qantas has been flying between Sydney and New York since 1958, as part of its inaugural round-the-world service, reaching the city via Fiji, Honolulu, and San Francisco. Currently, the airline flies daily between Sydney and New York via Auckland (AKL), using Boeing 787-9s.
The new nonstop flights will cut around three hours off the travel time compared to existing one-stop services. Even when the nonstop Sydney to New York flight is launched, the airline still plans to maintain its one-stop service from Sydney to New York via Auckland.
Qantas will launch this nonstop service once it has five A350-1000ULRs — two planes are needed to operate each route, and then they also need a spare. You can expect the flight will take around 18 hours eastbound and around 20 hours westbound, so it’s quite the long haul journey. At 9,950 miles, it’ll be the world’s second longest flight, after the 10,573-mile London flight.
As usual, Qantas is very skilled at creating hype and publicity around new service. The airline has been promoting this Project Sunrise concept for a decade, and seems to have had a party just now in New York, celebrating this route.
That’s a bit confusing, because we’ve known this route was coming, and it seems odd to host a party with the concept of “hey, in about a year we’re going to start selling tickets on a flight that will launch about a year after that.” But don’t worry, I’m sure there will be another party as well!
Here’s what Qantas Group CEO Vanessa Hudson had to say about Project Sunrise New York service:
“Conquering the tyranny of distance has been part of who Qantas is from the very beginning. Reaching New York non-stop completes a vision we set out many years ago, and it’s a moment of enormous pride for the thousands of our people who have been working hard to make Project Sunrise a reality.”
“New York has always captured the imagination, and for generations, reaching it from Australia has meant breaking up the journey somewhere along the way. From 2028, our customers will be able to board in Sydney and arrive in New York around 18 hours later without stopping once, cutting around three hours off the current fastest travel time. That changes what’s possible for travel between our two countries.”
“Flying these distances is only worth doing if our customers arrive feeling their best, and that belief has shaped everything we’ve built. Over the past decade, working alongside experts, we’ve designed the aircraft and the onboard experience around the science of ultra long-haul travel, from the lighting to the meals to a world-first Wellbeing Zone. This is a fundamentally different way to fly.”
Qantas A350-1000ULRs will have 238 seats in four cabins
Qantas has a total of 12 Airbus A350-1000ULRs on order, which feature extra fuel tanks, as well as a higher maximum takeoff weight than the standard A350-1000, which the airline also has on order. Note that the airline only plans to use six of the planes for the “real” Project Sunrise flights, and will then use the remaining planes to grow in other markets.
Qantas’ A350-1000ULRs will be specially configured for long haul flying, and will be in a very spacious configuration:
- Qantas’ A350-1000ULRs will carry just 238 passengers, which is way fewer seats than you’ll find on most carriers’ A350s
- The planes will feature four classes of service, including six first class seats, 52 business class seats, 40 premium economy seats, and 140 economy seats
- Economy will feature 32-34″ of pitch, which is slightly more spacious than what you’d typically find in economy (where 31″ is the standard for long haul flights), though the airline has already taken away some legroom, as initially the plan was for all seats to have at least 33″ of pitch
- Qantas will be introducing a new first class suite and business class seat with a door on A350-1000s
- Qantas A350-1000ULRs will feature a dedicated wellness zone
- All Qantas A350-1000s will feature fast and free Wi-Fi, in partnership with Viasat

I’ve talked more about the cabin interiors in a separate post, because there’s lots to cover. AeroLOPA also has a seat map of the new cabins, which is interesting to look at.
I have to say, as much as I enjoy flying, these flights are really getting to a length where I wonder if I might just prefer a connection, so I can stretch my legs. I guess if you’re in first or business class it’s hard to complain, though in premium economy or economy, this seems like quite the undertaking. But I guess that’s the beauty of choice, as there are also plenty of one-stop options.
We know that Qantas is hoping to charge about 20% more for these flights over itineraries with connections, though of course the market will decide whether consumers are willing to pay that.
Bottom line
Qantas has announced the timing of its second Project Sunrise route, as the airline will start flying between Sydney and New York as of mid-2028, with flights going on sale as of August 2027. The airline will operate this route with Airbus A350-1000ULRs, which is a unique aircraft type the airline has on order.
At just under 10,000 miles and with a flight time of around 20 hours, this will be the second longest flight in the world, after the Sydney to London flight, which launches in October 2027.
What’s your take on Qantas’ plans to fly from Sydney to New York? Would you like to take this flight, or would you rather connect?
YES I WILL. In true mileage run style I will position at LHR . get a proper rest at a dodgy motel in Hounslow. Do some plane spotting. Then fly to Sydney in the main cabin. Head straight to the Sydney Harbour. Crush a couple of flat whites. Take a ferry ride. Shop at the ASICS flagship store in CBD mall. Check into an apart hotel rated 8.2 good (1.2K reviews) in Chinatown for some sleep. Then fly back the following day.
2028 ? You still believe on Qantas
True to form, digs at qantas. Were you at the launch/announcement? I'd say not. Yet you feel you can comment as if you know all and let the misguided think you were and you're writing with authority. You talk about transparency in other reports, why not be transparent and say you weren't there in such cases? You're as poor as the bloggers you criticise.
41K AUD on FIRST return, in your dreams.
Did the JFK-SIN flight both ways to check off world's longest flight so may have to try LHR-SYD in a couple of years. I will say that economy (even with a couple extra inches of pitch) is torture on that flight. I like SQs A350-900ULR with business and premium economy. Sure maybe add a few first class seats but stop at premium economy as that is hard enough, even on SQ, for 18 1/2 hours.
Because SQ premium economy sucks.
Even those 6 seats are overrated.
To all those saying this is crazy... 18h in one direction, 20h in the other one is not much different from the current NYC-SIN flights which take a bit under 19 hours... And they've been running full for a decade or so...
More than a decade, if we include SIN-EWR. It was stopped a I think about 5 years when they reitred the A345, but SIN-EWR/JFK has been around now since 2004 I believe.
Pour one out to them for finally losing the longest flight in the world title (though obvously they gave it up in the period between the A345 flight ending and the A359ulr flight restarting)
More than a decade. I did SIN EWR return 3 or 4 times way back around 2004 on SQ’s 340 with the angled seats in 2-2-2 config. Painful, and now I will only do that distance with a stop, even with the newer aircraft flying that route.
Call me crazy, but if I can get an award ticket on J or F for Summer (US) 2028, I'll position myself in JFK to fly this once. Hoping to be in Australia for the 2028 solar eclipse.
Avgeek history detail: as Ben says, Qantas did fly to New York in the late 50s (did it start pre-jet?) and 60s as part of a flight to London via the Pacific. In the late 60s Qantas also introduced a second transpacific route via Tahiti, Acapulco, Mexico City, Nassau and Bermuda (the “Fiesta” route). Then in the (very early?) 70s the NY route was dropped, and there was no service to NYC until it restarted...
Avgeek history detail: as Ben says, Qantas did fly to New York in the late 50s (did it start pre-jet?) and 60s as part of a flight to London via the Pacific. In the late 60s Qantas also introduced a second transpacific route via Tahiti, Acapulco, Mexico City, Nassau and Bermuda (the “Fiesta” route). Then in the (very early?) 70s the NY route was dropped, and there was no service to NYC until it restarted as a tag from LA (in the 2000s?). The Fiesta route was dropped later than NYC (early 80s?), so for some time there was service to Nassau and Bermuda but not NYC. I always loved the Fiesta route, I imagine it full of drunk aging playboys.
Viasat. Ugh. Brand new aircraft and Qantas is still putting Viasat in. They should also bring back those in flight fax machines. I guess Vanessa Hudson consulted Tim Dunn on this one.
20 hours even in Business? No thank you. When I go to AU I always do a separate flight to LA, overnight and continue on the next evening. On the way back I do the connection same day and continue on. I'm ready to lose it when that flight hits pavement.
I’m getting a bit of a “Groundhog Day” feeling. When Qantas launched the non-stop Perth-London route, the received wisdom of the majority of avgeeks — including here on OMAAT — was that it would be a disaster: *no-one* would spend 17/18 hours on a non-stop when they could transit using lovely metal in Singapore or Bangkok. Turns out all the avgeeks were wrong: Qantas tells us PER-LHR is its most profitable route. I’ve done it...
I’m getting a bit of a “Groundhog Day” feeling. When Qantas launched the non-stop Perth-London route, the received wisdom of the majority of avgeeks — including here on OMAAT — was that it would be a disaster: *no-one* would spend 17/18 hours on a non-stop when they could transit using lovely metal in Singapore or Bangkok. Turns out all the avgeeks were wrong: Qantas tells us PER-LHR is its most profitable route. I’ve done it a couple of times and it was fine. I won’t fly via Perth if I have to go on to Sydney or Melbourne, because why would I split the journey at Perth and take some sub-standard 737MAX? But I’d gladly take a non-stop to Sydney (and, hopefully, one day, Melbourne…)
Looking forward to this flight. Seems so far away though, lol.
I'm in Aistralia every year, but never expect to be on this flight. For those Americans in cities with SYD non stops (SFO, LAX, IAH, DFW), this is out. For most of the rest of Americans, flying home-JFK-SYD has more total time in the air than home-[one of the hubs above]-SYD. Plus, you avoid the 20-hour leg. And, it sounds like having the JFK-SYD leg as part of your trip will increase the airfare a lot.
Curious, I looked up PIT-DFW-SYD. It's 3 + 17 = 20 hours in the air. PIT-JFK is 1.5 hours. So do you want 3+17 or 1.5+20. I'll take the lesser total time. Trading 3 for 1.5 is no problem, and trading 17 for 20 is a great deal. And, I'd save money. It seems to me the success of the route depends on the number of NYC origin/destination pax there are (plus, maybe cities north...
Curious, I looked up PIT-DFW-SYD. It's 3 + 17 = 20 hours in the air. PIT-JFK is 1.5 hours. So do you want 3+17 or 1.5+20. I'll take the lesser total time. Trading 3 for 1.5 is no problem, and trading 17 for 20 is a great deal. And, I'd save money. It seems to me the success of the route depends on the number of NYC origin/destination pax there are (plus, maybe cities north and east of NYC plus those with JFK n/s but none to other hubs that will get you to Australia).
This flight is not chasing US-based connections, it is chasing the giant NYC metro, and I guess some Australia side connections to get to New York.
Would be shocked if this doesnt work. It may not be full all the time or the best performing route, but enough demand to keep it alive will be there.
I too was confused. I thought they already announced New York? But I guess that last big party was for London? But what about the fifty parties before that? I actually do enjoy flying Qantas but to hype all of this like you said Ben, just to say tickets will go on sale next year.
However, as much as 18-20hrs nonstop sound miserable, I think this makes more sense than LHR IMO. There are...
I too was confused. I thought they already announced New York? But I guess that last big party was for London? But what about the fifty parties before that? I actually do enjoy flying Qantas but to hype all of this like you said Ben, just to say tickets will go on sale next year.
However, as much as 18-20hrs nonstop sound miserable, I think this makes more sense than LHR IMO. There are tons of pleasant alternatives to LHR that breaks up the journey without a significant detour (SQ, TG, MH, EK, EY, QR, etc.)
But for Australia to JFK, the most direct alternative outside of the current set up via AKL is to connect through LAX or SFO. Given the hassle of the intl to domestic transfer process, it does sound appealing to do all of that when you arrive at JFK.
I’ve actually done JFK-AKL in economy twice and, perhaps surprisingly, didn’t find it too awful, so the extra few hours to Sydney doesn’t scare me quite as much as it probably should. What’s harder to believe is that Project Sunrise is finally becoming real since it seems wants has been talking about these flights for so long that I was ready to bet that Baltia airlines would become a reality sooner than waiting for JFK-SYD....
I’ve actually done JFK-AKL in economy twice and, perhaps surprisingly, didn’t find it too awful, so the extra few hours to Sydney doesn’t scare me quite as much as it probably should. What’s harder to believe is that Project Sunrise is finally becoming real since it seems wants has been talking about these flights for so long that I was ready to bet that Baltia airlines would become a reality sooner than waiting for JFK-SYD. Looking forward to seeing how the economics work in practice, particularly with such a premium-heavy 238-seat configuration.
Ok, now that they’ve officially delayed further, I feel less ‘meh’ about booking the itinerary with stops in AKL/LAX for an upcoming trip. I’ve taken the other longest flights (SQ21,22,23,24). +20 hours in one go is usually better than 18 + 3, or 16 + 5, etc., because the layovers aren’t usually ‘great.’ Will be nice when they operate the nonstop and the 35K. Still cool to see QF at JFK T8, even if it’s...
Ok, now that they’ve officially delayed further, I feel less ‘meh’ about booking the itinerary with stops in AKL/LAX for an upcoming trip. I’ve taken the other longest flights (SQ21,22,23,24). +20 hours in one go is usually better than 18 + 3, or 16 + 5, etc., because the layovers aren’t usually ‘great.’ Will be nice when they operate the nonstop and the 35K. Still cool to see QF at JFK T8, even if it’s just their 787. I recall when they flew the 747 with the stop in LAX. The kangaroo on the tail is a nice sight.
It's nuts having to spend 20 hours in a flight. But it will be on my bucket list.
Deez n… (never mind)
Why are you so up early?! Haha
Anyhow, would you be one of the first passengers?! heh you don't really do inaugural flights anymore.
@ Mike O. -- Hah, I am home but struggling with jet lag, surprisingly. Since I usually get up at 4AM, jetlag currently has me getting up at 1AM, which is less than ideal!
I do hope to take this Qantas flight, though I'm curious what opportunities I can find to get a bit of a deal, once flights do go on sale...
I know you've always been an early riser but now you are married with 2 small ones how does that work? It must not be easy if you're exhausted by dinner time or ready for bed before the children?!
@ Nikojas -- It's definitely not ideal, and it just means I don't get a whole lot of sleep for a few days. The good news is that once I get back into the rhythm of things, I typically have a great sleep situation. At least our kids go to bed early (by 7PM), so I don't have to stay up that late!
I'm undertaking a 12-13 hour flight (MAD-)FRA-SIN in December (Premium Economy) and that's more than enough for me! The only reason I selected that route rather than MAD-Gulf-SIN was in case of any potential disruption in the area.