Yet Another US Airways Flight Diverts Due To Crew Illness

Yet Another US Airways Flight Diverts Due To Crew Illness

4

For the third time this year, a US Airways plane bound for Philadelphia has diverted due to an “odor” on the plane causing nausea amongst the crew. For a change in pace, this flight originated in Tel Aviv and diverted to Rome, rather than the Venice to Dublin setup from earlier in the year.

Via the Aviation Herald:

A US Airways Airbus A330-200, registration N289AY performing flight US-797 (dep Dec 5th) from Tel Aviv (Israel) to Philadelphia,PA (USA) with 129 passengers and 14 crew (4 flight crew), was enroute at FL360 about 160nm east of Rome (Italy) when the crew decided to divert to Rome’s Fiumicino Airport declaring a medical emergency after 11 crew and 2 passenger reported feeling ill and showing red eyes, a number vomitted. The aircraft landed safely at Fiumicino Airport about 30 minutes later, all crew and the two ill passengers were taken to a hospital.

A malfunction of the aircraft’s airconditioning system is being suspected based on initial examination.

The airline reported that the aircraft made an unscheduled landing after an odour was reported in the cabin causing nausea and eye irritations. The two passengers feeling ill and all crew were taken to a hospital for medical examination, 3 flight attendants needed additional hospital care, the others were discharged after examination. All passengers were re-accomodated on other flights.

All three of these “mysterious” diversions this year have been on US Airways A330-200 aircraft. This plane (N289AY) was involved in one of the two diversions this spring, though the previous diversion was on a different aircraft, so it doesn’t seem to be an issue with the plane as such.

Very odd…

 

Conversations (4)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Jonathan Member

    Did anyone else find it interesting that the load was extremely light on this TLV flight? I wonder if they can even turn profit

  2. Al Member

    It was probably the smell of the Humus. Also why were they flying so far south that Rome was the closest landing site. Most flights flying Westward from TLV to the east cost fly farther North

  3. Joey Diamond

    Very strange. Did they ever publicly state what the cause was back in May?

    1. lucky OMAAT

      @ Joey -- I don't believe so.

Featured Comments Most helpful comments ( as chosen by the OMAAT community ).

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Jonathan Member

Did anyone else find it interesting that the load was extremely light on this TLV flight? I wonder if they can even turn profit

0
Al Member

It was probably the smell of the Humus. Also why were they flying so far south that Rome was the closest landing site. Most flights flying Westward from TLV to the east cost fly farther North

0
lucky OMAAT

@ Joey -- I don't believe so.

0
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,163,247 Miles Traveled

32,614,600 Words Written

35,045 Posts Published