United’s Gaslighting Continues: Carry-On Fees Are For Customers’ Benefit

Earlier American Airlines announced that as of September 5, 2018, they’ll begin allowing basic economy passengers to take a free, full size carry-on with them. This is a huge victory for consumers, and shows that voting with our wallets works.

American claimed that more than 60% of customers were paying to avoid basic economy, meaning that they “bought up” to the cheapest non-basic fare. They spin that as a good thing, though it’s not the only valuable metric in determining the success of this. The real question is how much business they’re losing to other airlines because of the policy. It’s great if they can get 60% of people to pay more than they did before, but presumably they’re losing a lot of customers to other airlines, or else they wouldn’t have rolled back this policy.

Delta has offered basic economy for years, and they always allowed a free carry-on when booking these fares. That leaves United as the only one of the “big three” that doesn’t allow free carry-ons when booking basic economy fares. United has generally by far been the most aggressive when it comes to their rollout of basic economy, and I think they have spreadsheet-champion and bean-counter-extraordinaire Scott Kirby to thank for that.

So, before we get too excited and think that United will have to cave for competitive reasons, the airline has already stated that they don’t plan to. Leslie Josephs of CNBC reports that United doesn’t plan to get rid of their basic economy carry-on restriction because it speeds up boarding and ensures flights leave on time.

United will keep penalizing passengers and charging them extra to get the same thing they got at no extra cost before… and they’re doing it for us!

The funny thing is that even since basic economy has been introduced, I haven’t noticed any decrease in terms of the number of American or United flights I take where they announce “we’re expecting a completely full flight, and some people will have to check carry-on bags.” Quite to the contrary, I’ve seen some flights delayed because people were arguing with the gate agent over having to pay for a carry-on, not realizing that it wasn’t included in the fare.

Scott Kirby has been on a mission to generate an extra one billion dollars in revenue by the end of the decade by better segmenting the market. I suspect he will indeed reach that goal, though it does nothing to account for the hundreds of millions (or billions) of dollars that they’ll lose in revenue from customers who simply choose to book elsewhere.

There’s a huge benefit to online travel agencies increasingly letting customers sort itineraries by whether or not they include free carry-ons, and with United being the only one of the “big three” to still have this policy, it’s going to cost them dearly.

Keep voting with your wallets, folks! And by that I mean simply don’t book an airline when they offer basic economy in a market, because you’re rewarding their behavior regardless of whether you book basic economy or “buy up” to a regular fare.

What do you guys think — will United be forced to backpedal and add carry-ons to basic economy fares, or do you think they’ll stick to their current plan?

Conversations (37)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

mark Guest

@Bob, We been there - done that. Too often some big, too fat for economy, noxious and obnoxious, goober (let's call him Bob) takes the middle seat between the wife and me. Truth be told, on the rare occasion that I do fly coach, I claim to be fat and buy 2 seats for myself to avoid obnoxious, noxious Bob's.

0
‼ 0
Bob Guest

@mark. Enjoy the luxury of domestic F. All the free flowing $5 wine and processed snacks you can handle! And don't forget 1" of legroom more than my exit row (which with status comes with free booze and same food for free) All for only double the price!

0
‼ 0
Marco Guest

Count me in as well in support on UA on this one. Want to fly domestic in BE? Be practical and bring a small backpack that fits nicely under the seat in front of you or buy checked luggage. And this smooths out the boarding process, despite anyone's wishful thinking to the contrary.

0
‼ 0
Tony Guest

The other unintended perk about Basic Economy are all the free bump ups to Economy Plus. I can basically guarantee now that if there’s an empty seat next to me in E+, someone with a Group 5 boarding pass ends up next to me. My last three transcon flights had E completely full and plenty of E+ still available the day before departure only to be completely full the next day.

0
‼ 0
JJ Guest

Charging for carry on makes sense - but only if free checked bags are available. Fly in a country where free checked bags are still the norm. The overheads fly 50% empty. People bring a purse and briefcase on board and thats it,

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published