South African Airways Plans To Shrink Their Way Into Profitability

South African Airways has been in a horrible financial situation for a long time. The airline has been losing money for years, and their losses keep getting bigger, with no signs of that changing. The airline has an inefficient fleet, an inefficient route network, and there are also reports of a lot of corruption. The airline has gone through seven CEOs in the past five years, which gives you a sense of the situation they’re in.

The airline has missed several payments to creditors, and South Africa’s deputy finance spokesperson last year said that “essentially they are insolvent and should have filed for liquidation.” Ouch.

So the airline has been looking for investors, but not surprisingly there hasn’t been much interest. In 2017 the airline lost 473 million USD, which is a loss that’s three times bigger than what they had in the previous year.

The airline has now revealed their plan to break even within three years. We’ll have to wait and see if they’re successful, though it’s more of a strategy than they’ve had in years. The airline is hoping to shrink their way into profitability. Per Bloomberg, here’s what SAA’s CEO had to say:

“We now have a clear strategy and clear path to profitability defined by the board,” said Jarana, who became SAA’s first permanent CEO in three years when he started work in November. “We are looking at a three-year window to get to a break-even point. We continue to revise the strategy as we see more opportunities.”

What does this turnaround plan look like? It consists of two main concepts.

First of all, the airline plans to reduce the number of money-losing routes they operate. They haven’t provided specific examples of what this will look like going forward, though they note that last month they halved frequencies to Heathrow, and in 2017 they reduced flights to some African capitals.

The other part of their plan is that South African Airways intends to transfer some of their unneeded planes to Mango Airlines, which is their low cost subsidiary that makes money.

While SAA was previously relying on new investors, SAA’s new CEO says that he is putting that on hold until they’re in a better financial situation. Instead they’re talking to the National Treasury in hopes of getting further funding from them, now that they have a clear plan:

A fund-raising plan laid out by Jarana last year to sell a stake to an equity partner will have to be shelved until the balance sheet has been repaired, the CEO said. A new investor would “most likely be attracted to an SAA that’s actually dealt with its own challenges and restructured,” he said in a phone interview Monday.

“We are busy talking to the National Treasury about how to fund the new plan,” Jarana said. “We are quite clear that the new plan is solid and we are very aggressive about implementing it.”

Only time will tell if South African Airways succeeds with their new strategy.


South African Airways’ A340 business class

Bottom line

It sounds to me like SAA has a clearer strategy than they’ve otherwise had in the past decade, not that this is saying a whole lot. At least based on the quotes, I’m impressed by SAA’s new CEO, so here’s to hoping he can actually make the airline more sustainable. It’s sad when an airline has to make the tough decision of shrinking their way out of losses, though it seems like the only option the airline has.

(Tip of the hat to Simon)

Conversations (19)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Frank Guest

I am an ex SAA manager and left voluntarily years ago, before the rot started.(Coleman era) SAA had a window of opportunity to become one of the worlds top airlines, post 1994. There are however a number reasons for the airlines present state: 1) Do a calculation on Flight Crew (pilots) vs Cabin Crew on SAA (The ratio is 1 to 3!) The wages of SAA pilots is the equivalent of 35% to 40% of the total airline wage budget. Is this in line with profitable airlines? 2) The airline management structure is top heavy, many are appointed due to political connections, and there is no accountability. 3) The schedule / Flight routes are not based on the normal ROI principles. 4) Purchasing is open to corruption. 5) The variety of aircraft operated by SAA reduces synergy of operations and results in a 'wastage' of labor. Pilots only operate one aircraft type and this impacts on schedule flexibility. With the lease of every new aircraft type there is a related impact re. training of pilots and maintenance/ support crew. 6) Sad as it is, but SAA should have closed it s doors years ago if it was not for the Taxpayer. I can not vouch for this, but I was told that if you divide the Annual loss by the number of passengers flown the loss or rather "Subsidy " per passenger comes to over $200 per passenger! It would therefore be better for the Taxpayer if the airline shuts down. 7) It also did not help that the previous chair-lady was a close friend of Mr. Zuma!

0
‼ 0
Ray Guest

Ben you constantly talk about airlines that are going out of business or in trouble. (thanks for keeping us informed). Do you have any knowledge about the maintenance programs of the troubled airlines? for example, many of the African airlines have a well deserved, terrible maintenance and crash record What about all the other airlines that get into financial trouble. Is maintenance the first to go and does that affect reliability?

0
‼ 0
Robbo Member

Good. Maybe QR could take them over, C'mon Al, take over mate. Flick most of those lazy-arse South African flight attendants and deliver the airline into profit with good service, good fares and hot young flight attendants. And some planes that look like they are from the 21st century. My god, those flight attendants are lazy-arses and most of them have gigantic arses too. They would not be leading me to safety in the event of an incident, more like roll, roll, roll yourself gently down the aisle. They would crush you to death with their substantial obesity before saving you. Good riddance. The airline is crap and I blame the lazy-arses on-board and the corruption rife throughout the management.

0
‼ 0
Peter Guest

Flight crew are good. Ground staff at JNB especially are among the most uninterested and ignorant people I have experienced in 45 years of flying. Same as the country. Running full speed to bankruptcy. Assume Zuma and the Gupta brothers had their finger in the pie. Heading for Trump's "shit hole" status. May SAA be allowed to disappear as an act of mercy.

0
‼ 0
Azamaraal Diamond

Just completed a flight from JNB to HKG on their A340. Was the best ever on SAA - food was delicious and service attentive! Hope they survive. Our follow-up flights were on EVA and I have never been so disappointed in my life given all the hype I have read! Once they get their new A330 they might have a chance.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published

Keep Exploring OMAAT