Qantas Bans Politician Following Airport Rant

An Australian politician has been banned from flying with Qantas for six months. This came after she allegedly went on a rant against Qantas staff, and talked about her “p*ssy power.”

Denied airport lounge access causes drama

This incident happened on March 25, 2021, at Melbourne Airport, and involves Jacqui Lambie, a controversial senator from Tasmania. Qantas has a Chairman’s Lounge, which is an invitation only lounge reserved for business executives, politicians, and VVIPs (more on that below).

Apparently due to previous incidents, Lambie’s access to the lounge had been suspended, and she wasn’t happy to discover that. As she admits, she “blew [her] top at a Qantas worker who didn’t deserve it.” She also apparently spoke of her “p*ssy power” (which, I mean, more power to her).

Initially there had been reports that she called Qantas’ openly gay CEO a “poof,” though it has now been confirmed that wasn’t said. She vehemently denied it, and Qantas even confirmed in a written statement that she did not “make a homophobic remark as part of this incident.”

https://twitter.com/JacquiLambie/status/1398167942529884161

Qantas issues a six month flight ban

Apparently Qantas and the politician have been “negotiating” over what a fair punishment would be (I love the concept of that), and it has been agreed that a six month Qantas ban would be fair. I would be willing to bet she won’t be invited back to the Chairman’s Lounge when her flight ban is over. 😉

I guess at this point she’ll have to fly Virgin Australia, which is the only other airline that can fly her between Tasmania and Canberra.

Lambie has issued an apology, and it’s a good one at that. Here’s what she said:

“It was the end of a long week in Canberra. I’d backed into a car that morning, got a speeding ticket on the way to work, and my flight home was delayed. It was a bad day for me. But it was worse for the poor Qantas staff who had to stand and take my rant. It was totally uncalled for and totally unacceptable behaviour on my part.

I have apologised to the staff for my actions, and I’d like to do so again. I’ll take whatever punishment Qantas throws at me. I’ve done the crime and I’ll do the time, because that’s what I deserve.”

I’m really impressed that this isn’t just an “I’m sorry if you were offended” apology, but it actually seems heartfelt, or at a minimum takes accountability for what happened. It’s not often we see that from politicians, so at least kudos to her for that.

Qantas has banned a politician for six months for her behavior

What I find funny about Qantas’ Chairman’s Lounge

Since we’re talking about Qantas’ Chairman’s Lounge, it’s interesting to consider what is and isn’t considered appropriate in different countries:

  • In Australia, airlines give invitation only status to politicians, and even have special lounges for them, allowing them to also mix with top business executives; that’s not at all frowned upon, while that would be considered unfathomable in the United States
  • It seems to me like there’s a conflict of interest there — wouldn’t politicians be more likely to act favorably towards an airline that gives them special perks?

To be clear, I’m not suggesting we have higher ethical standards with politics given how campaign funding goes in the United States. And for that matter we see similar things in the United States, but it just happens under the table, and we act fake outraged when we find out about it.

It’s just a funny difference, since no one in Australia seems to bat en eyelid over it.

Bottom line

An Australian politician wasn’t happy to be denied access to Qantas’ invitation-only Chairman’s Lounge, which many politicians enjoy access to. She apparently acted inappropriately towards a Qantas employee, and has agreed to a six month flight ban.

She claims she was having an exceptionally bad day and takes accountability for the way she acted, so kudos to her for that, at least.

What do you make of this Qantas Chairman’s Lounge incident?

Conversations (22)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Azamaraal Guest

I admire the honest and accurate apology. I wish that Justin Trudeau, Canada's only politician convicted of conflict of interest numerous times by his own appointed commissioner, would take the same level of responsibility for his actions. As an honourable man he would have resigned years ago. In one case he allegedly groped a junior reporter in a small town. His apology was "we seem to have a different view of what happened" or similar. Similar to a famous quote "I never had *** with that woman". In a reasonable democracy everyone should have the right to converse with people of all backgrounds and agendas. Openly accepting that politicians do have to work with industry does not automatically guarantee a bad outcome which is perhaps an odd mindset to people who believe that industry is inherently bad for society and evil to the world.

0
‼ 0
platy Guest

In my opinion, Lambie is a mixed bag. I reluctantly agree with her on some issues (strengthen political donation laws, resist commercialisation of tertiary education to the detriment of poorer folk), but otherwise she's a certified far right wing nut job (raving anti-Islamist, war criminal apologist). She originally stood for a fringe party (Palmer United) set up by a bumbling mining magnate called Clive Palmer. A few of his candidates were elected only almost every one of them, including Lambie, then deserted his party to act as independent politicians or joined other minor parties of fringe-dwells muppets. Most faltered, but somehow Lambie prevailed. Palmer tried to resurrect his party, but was been decimated in recent elections. I suspect Lambie is at heart a fairly decent person, just very misguided / poorly informed / pig buttocks ignorant, etc., on a range of issues. Other fringe polls also misbehave when travelling, including the raving loon, Bob Katter in North Queensland. He makes a big deal of refusing to take his hat off at airport security. I've watched his antics at Cairns domestic security, luckily then to enjoy a complimentary upgrade for myself and partner from coach to business when he was overlooked and sat defiantly in his seat some rows back in coach. Bob's no fool and knows how to play to the gallery. @ Ben Yes, it amazes me too that there is no corporate ethical accountability. QF has a published guidelines document for ethical behaviour which staff are expected to follow - it excludes political favours. The behaviour would be frowned upon by global US-based corporations, for which I have consulted through my business. This apparently forgotten in the case of the Chairman's Lounge, which is the hottest ticket in town by invitation of the Chairman only, for handpicked CEOs and politicians. Qantas also supplies our thirsty politicians by sending them free wine, which they sometimes remember to declare on their registers of gifts and financial interests. There is a very cosy relationship between the airline and the politicians. Whenever QF is under financial stress they crawl to government with their begging bowl. During the pandemic they creamed government "job keeper" payments for under utilised staff only to sack many once the job keeper payments ended at end March 2021. Similarly in late 2013 when the share price had collapsed they went whinging to the government - fortunately, the latter called their bluff - a situation which I discussed with a certain current Australian political party leader when we sat next to each on a flight at the time.

0
‼ 0
skedguy Guest

All this for calling Alan Joyce a po*f? OY!

0
‼ 0
Crosscourt Guest

Painful woman. I'm perplexed as to why to find the chairman's lounge different or questionable. You think BA or US carriers don't have something similar or emirates? I've been a chairman's lounge member...

0
‼ 0
Morgan Guest

Fair apology but good she deserves a 6 month ban.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published