Norwegian Cancelling All Transatlantic Flights From Scotland

18 months ago, Norwegian made a huge announcement that they were launching a series of narrow body flights between Europe and North America, using Boeing 737 MAX aircraft. Most transatlantic flights are operated by long haul, wide body aircraft, so this announcement was significant because there were now much smaller planes that had lower operating costs and would be much easier to fill.

Now the 737 MAX does have restrictions on how far it can fly non stop, so Norwegian was limited in the routes they could operate the aircraft with. So they chose European cities in Ireland and Scotland that were as far west as possible, and then secondary airports in the east coast US.

There was plenty of debate amongst OMAAT readers at the time of the viability of these routes.

Some of you recognised the catchment area of the US airports was significant enough that these flights would work at the right prices.

Others noted that the distance from the major cities of New York and Boston that they were serving made it too time consuming and inconvenient, regardless of the cost savings.

Edinburgh, Scotland

Norwegian initially announced that they would fly from Edinburgh, Scotland to the following destinations

  • Stewart Airport (SWF),
  • Hartford (BDL), and
  • Providence (PVD)

However, this strategy has not worked for Norwegian as planned.

In January 2018, Norwegian announced they were cancelling flights from Edinburgh to Hartford from March 2018, and reducing services to Stewart and Providence. Then in April 2018 they announced they would cancel flights from Edinburgh to Providence from October 2018.

Now comes the news that they will also be cancelling flights from Edinburgh to Stewart from March 2019, meaning they will no longer operate transatlantic flights from Edinburgh.

Norwegian has blamed the frustrating UK Air Passenger Duty Tax which the Scottish Government has considered reducing for flights from Scotland, as Norwegian launched the flights. The Scottish Government has decided not to reduce the APD, so Norwegian has said routes from Scotland are not profitable.

Bottom line

It is always a risk launching a route on the prospect of a government initiative that will reduce costs.

If Norwegian could manage to get the 737 MAX to work to secondary cities in mainland Europe (without the UK APD) I could definitely see the model working — after all, Primera Air is trying it, and they don’t have anywhere near the brand recognition that Norwegian does.

Norwegian will continue to operate flights between the US and Ireland using the 737 MAX aircraft and it’s still an exciting time to travel given all these airlines are trying all these interesting new routes with their next generation aircraft.

I’ve just seen they are also cancelling all transatlantic flights from Belfast.

Edinburgh remains a wonderful destination to visit, regardless of how you might fly there.

Would you fly a Norwegian 737 across the Atlantic?

Conversations (28)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

The nice Paul Diamond

@ Gordon “APD makes no difference to business ... flyers who are mostly not sensitive to price” I always wonder what sort of businesses people are describing when they write things like this. Probably businesses that will go bust in the foreseeable future. *Every* organisation I’ve worked for has had strict rules about expensing, though the best strike a balance between cost and convenience (since convenience=time and time=money).

0
‼ 0
Mike Guest

I visit Scotland quite often to see my friends there. I always book a £10 Ryanair flight GLA-DUB to avoid APD and then catch my onward long-haul flight from DUB. Thanks, Ryanair :)

0
‼ 0
M LIM New Member

What about having flights out of Inverness as a hub with local connections to Edinburgh & rest of UK? Selling it as separate tickets. That would avoid APD & increase tourism in the Scottish north

0
‼ 0
Marriott Marty Guest

I recall a while back that Inverness airport was exempt from APD, is that still true (as it is In Scotland...

0
‼ 0
Tom Guest

Several years ago we received an email from the CEO of BA (I believe it was sent to all of their frequent flyers), explaining that the taxes and APD were making it impossible to offer competitive airfare in and out of LHR. He requested that we send a letter to the Chancellor of the Exchequer explaining the impact these fees were having on our travel decisions regarding travel to the UK. We sent the letter, I suspect it was joined by many others. The timing was just prior to the planned 2016 fee hike. The increase in fees went ahead....we’ve altered our plans accordingly. The government philosophy seems to be that the business travelers will pay the fees regardless of amount to avoid the inconvenience associated with making other airport/ airline arrangements. They may be correct...until there’s a downturn in the economy...

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member