Unvaccinated United Airlines Employees Return To Work

Among the major airlines in the United States, United Airlines has taken by far the strictest stance when it comes to requiring employee to be vaccinated. The airline has gone so far as to put employees requesting a medical or religious vaccine exemption on unpaid leave. That will shortly be changing, as these employees will be returning to work.

United brings back unvaccinated employees

It’s being reported that United Airlines employees who haven’t been vaccinated against coronavirus for religious or medical reasons can return to work at the end of March 2022.

This will only apply to US-based employees who requested a vaccine exemption, and not to the more than 200 employees who refused to get vaccinated and didn’t get a valid exemption. Those employees will continue to remain terminated. It’s estimated that around 2,000 employees successfully requested a vaccine exemption, so that’s potentially quite a few people returning to work.

From early on in the pandemic, United CEO Scott Kirby made it clear that getting employees vaccinated was a priority, regardless of whether or not there was a government mandate requiring it. He viewed it as an important step to protecting employees and customers, and stated that it would save lives.

In the fall of 2021, the airline made it clear that unvaccinated employees with an exemption would no longer be allowed to work in customer-facing roles. There was an attempt to find these employees non-customer facing roles, but those opportunities were limited, so most employees were put on unpaid leave. As you might have guessed, this policy has caused several lawsuits to be filed.

Unvaccinated United employees can return to work

United no longer considers the pandemic to be a serious risk

Here’s what’s interesting about United’s move. When United put unvaccinated employees on unpaid leave in November 2021, the airline said it would only bring back unvaccinated employees when the pandemic no longer poses a serious threat.

It goes without saying that case numbers are way down compared to the omicron peak we saw several weeks back. I think many of us are wondering what’s next — is another big wave coming, is there enough immunity between infections and vaccination to allow the pandemic to die down a bit, or what?

One thing is for sure — more and more of the world has decided to just live with coronavirus. We’ve seen many countries declare the end of coronavirus-related restrictions, accepting that the current situation is likely the new normal. It’ll be interesting to see whether that sticks, or if that’s a temporary move until the next wave. Nonetheless it’s noteworthy to see an airline essentially proclaiming that the pandemic no longer poses a serious threat.

One thing I can’t help but wonder about is what morale will be like among these employees. There are potentially quite a few people returning to work, and many have filed lawsuits and are likely not happy with the airline. Will they be happy to return to their jobs, or…?

United no longer views the pandemic as a big risk

Bottom line

In late 2021 United Airlines put most unvaccinated employees with an exemption on unpaid leave, meaning United had the strongest stance on vaccines of any major US airline. United executives said that unvaccinated employees wouldn’t return to work until the pandemic no longer poses a serious threat to public health, and it seems the airline has decided that the time is now.

What do you make of United bringing back unvaccinated employees?

Conversations (19)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

FlyerDon Guest

If I was United I would advise these returning employees that their medical insurance will not cover hospital costs if they contract covid and require hospitalization. The only exception would be for those that had legitimate medical conditions that prevented them from being vaccinated.

0
‼ 0
E. Guest

Considering the vaccines seem fairly useless, unfortunately (yes, I got vaccinated!), and we were all lied to by these companies - it's appalling people were fired for exercising their medical autonomy. They don't prevent spread, don't prevent infection, none of it and don't seem to help very much with outcomes either.

1
‼ 0
vbscript2 Guest

While there's plenty of extreme opinions (and, frankly, complete nonsense) from both sides of this issue, both their initial decision and this one seem reasonable from a data-driven standpoint. New cases are down to around 1/20 of their omicron-surge highs and still falling quickly (as exponential functions do.) By the end of the month, they'll likely at least halve again, getting us back down near the levels from early July of last year, before the delta and omicron surges started. It made sense to exclude unvaccinated employees from customer-facing roles during the omicron surge, particularly in an industry whose lifeblood is the ability of people to travel safely and reliably. But that surge is ending now, so allowing those employees to return by the end of the month now makes sense. Spread of communicable disease is an exponential function. When that exponent is much larger than 1 (and, thus, cases are increasing very rapidly,) more restrictive measures are needed than when that exponent is much less than 1, as is now the case.

3
‼ 0
shoeguy Guest

If these employees didn't get vaccinated due to a real health issue, which is a thing, then fine. If they opted out for the sake of identity politics, or over a gross misunderstanding of what freedom is and what it means, or worse, for a religious exemption, then they own a big part of COVID19's community spread, are part of the problem of the pandemic, not its solution. They have no sense of civic duty or pride and represent cogs in the wheel of misinformation, misery, aggression, oppression, and sit prominently atop all the things that made this pandemic the miserable human experience it is.

1
‼ 0
abey Guest

I feel like what's highly missed in this whole Kirby decision is the likelihood of sick employees and cost/airline reliability associated with that. Economics was likely the key driver in his decision followed by caring for employees

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published