Kylie Jenner’s Bizarre Private Jet Controversy

Kylie Jenner is making headlines at the moment for her private jet usage, though I’m not sure I get why this in particular is getting backlash, because it seems perfectly in line with her brand and everything she stands for?

Kylie Jenner’s very short private jet flights

This controversy started when Kylie Jenner posted a picture on Instagram with her boyfriend Travis Scott (I think that’s what he is, I’m not up to date on the drama?) in front of their private jets, with the caption “you wanna take mine or yours?”

Kylie has a Bombardier Global 7500, while Travis has an Embraer Lineage 1000 (a variant of the Embraer 190, which is a commercial jet).

Kylie Jenner’s Instagram picture

That post got some backlash in the comments, but I suppose everything does, when you have hundreds of millions of followers.

Around the same time, the @CelebrityJets Twitter account posted some interesting flights operated by Kylie’s private jet. This is an automated account that uses publicly available data to track where the private jets of celebrities are flying.

In particular, the flight has been operating some very short flights, between Van Nuys and Camarillo. Those airports are just 35 miles apart, and the flights took 12 to 17 minutes. Note that while there’s a rumor of a three minute flight, that didn’t actually happen, and as just an estimate based on the distance.

https://twitter.com/CelebJets/status/1548067135192121346
https://twitter.com/CelebJets/status/1547047653690822661

Many think that Kylie has been using her private jet to fly around Los Angeles in order to skip traffic. While I suppose that can’t be ruled out, I think the much more likely explanation is that the jet was repositioning. Odds are that she wanted to fly it into one airport, and then the jet repositioned, either for another flight, or because it’s based there.

I can’t imagine she’d be saving much time flying vs. driving, even with the wild traffic in Los Angeles. After all, getting to & from two airports takes time as well.

I don’t understand the selective outrage?

I’m certainly not here to defend Kylie (as you’ll see below), but I guess I’m a bit confused as to why these short flights are causing selective outrage? When billionaires have private jets, they typically like them to leave out of the airport closest to them. Who wouldn’t, if money is no factor, and you have no environmental concerns?

Is a 12-minute flight across town really worse for the environment than Kylie flying to the other side of the globe on her jet, when there’s a nonstop commercial flight she could take in first class? Is it worse than Kim Kardashian chartering a Boeing 777 for her birthday party? Or Kim Kardashian and Kanye chartering a 747 a few years back?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cehMG-kO0so

But that gets at the bigger issue here, which is the way in which our society idolizes these kinds of people. I know Bill Maher is controversial, and I disagree with him on many issues, but I think most reasonable people would agree with the underlying message of the first part of the below clip.

So yeah, do 12-17 minute private jet flights send the wrong message and seem like they should do damage to someone’s reputation? Sure. But this is exactly in line with everything the Jenners and Kardashians have been doing for years, so I don’t see what’s different here?

Bottom line

Some people seem shocked and frustrated that Kylie Jenner’s private jet is operating short flights around Los Angeles. In reality, I suspect that these are just repositioning flights to get the plane back to its base, or to operate another flight. After all, when you’re a billionaire with a big private jet, you want to fly out of the closest airport to where you’re at.

To me this is no more ridiculous than anything else that the Jenners and Kardashians do, which, admittedly, is a pretty high threshold.

Where do you stand on this controversy?

Conversations (36)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Tom Guest

Yes, the outage seems pretty selective, so I completely agree with Ben's sentiment. But the environmental impact occurs no matter who uses a huge plane as private transportation. It seems to me the only fair way to address this is through taxation tied to environmental impact. If I am charged, say, $100 for the environmental impact generated by me sitting in an economy seat for a trip across the Atlantic, surely a private jet traveler could be charged $10K or $100K for a flight with a per-capita impact 100 or 1000 times as great. Invest all proceeds into climate change research and mitigation and this might be a win-win-win for everyone: good for the planet, good PR for the super rich and the industry.

0
‼ 0
Fred Guest

Celebs and rich folks can do whatever they want, fly their planes wherever. Wake up a bit here. Aren't they throwing climate change at us. Even Bill Gates, flying everywhere and he is buying farms to take away meat and give us insects. Nice transition to the new world. Climate change again and again. Time to change, don't fly so many private planes, take the train (in Europe that is). How about Limos, can still work at your plans in the back, don't need to drive. Its all plain to see, that is if you are "awake".

0
‼ 0
Fred Guest

This reminds me very much when I lived in France (sic) and the erroneous expression used by the elite did not go over very well with our public then. "Let them eat cake" and as you may know, heads rolled. Also when I lived in NYC and wealthy Leona Helmsley owner of Helmsley hotels, stated "rich people don't pay taxes". It did fair well for her either with jail and large fines. So I take it from the recent news, that it is not only Jenner, Kardashians, but other celebrities as well. Lest not forget who was reprimanded just this week by the Queen of England for using the helicopters and planes to much. That would be William & Kate. Harry & Meghan escape Queen's wrath as they don't belong there anymore. So maybe Ben, this is the beginning of rising up against all those who "preach climate change, but take the private planes." My parents always said "practice what you preach". Lets see how it plays out as the minions (many of us) are being crushed at stores and paychecks shrinking.

0
‼ 0
Privileged Guest

Celebrities and billionaires in my opinion should be able to do what they want, so long as they contribute to the well-being of society of others, the K crew are not in this group and therefore should deserve the scorn of Twitter for their lack of contributions.

0
‼ 0
Hobbs Guest

If I followed a billionaire on social media, I wouldn’t demand that they take an Uber.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published