10% Of KLM Passengers From South Africa Test Positive For Coronavirus
Update: As a follow-up to this story from yesterday, of the 61 passengers who tested positive for coronavirus from these two KLM flights, the omicron variant has been found in 13 of them, so that accounts for ~21% of the cases on these flights.

Around 10% of passengers on KLM flights from South Africa yesterday tested positive for coronavirus upon arrival, despite a pre-travel testing requirement. That sure makes you wonder…

Friday’s eventful KLM flights from South Africa

We’re seeing all kinds of new travel restrictions added as a result of the omicron coronavirus variant. Many countries are banning nonstop flights and travelers from South Africa, and some KLM passengers got caught up in that yesterday.

KLM operates flights from both Cape Town (KL598) and Johannesburg (KL592) to Amsterdam, and Friday’s flights were problematic. The Netherlands imposed a South Africa flight ban on Friday in light of the new variant, but at the time KLM flights were already enroute from South Africa to the Netherlands.

When the KLM flights landed at Amsterdam Schiphol Airport, authorities weren’t sure what to do with these passengers. One flight was held on the tarmac for several hours, and a New York Times Global Health Reporter was even on the flight, live Tweeting the whole situation.

https://twitter.com/snolen/status/1464226622127677476

Eventually passengers were allowed to deplane, but then passengers had to undergo mandatory testing. And that’s where this story gets especially interesting, if you ask me.

At least 61 KLM passengers test positive for coronavirus

Of the roughly 600 passengers on the two flights, at least 61 people have tested positive for coronavirus, which is a positivity rate of around 10% (and presumably more people will test positive for coronavirus in the coming days). This is pretty wild, because it’s reported that passengers also had to show a negative coronavirus test result prior to travel, taken within 24 hours.

Passengers were kept at the airport until their coronavirus test results were available. Of the 61 passengers who tested positive, 13 tested positive for the new omicron variant, so that represents around 21% of the passengers.

Passengers who tested positive need to go into quarantine — those who live in the Netherlands can quarantine at home, while others were put into hotels. Those who tested negative have been told to quarantine for at least five days, though could continue their travels to their final destination.

What should we even make of this?

It’s pretty shocking to consider that 10% of passengers on these two KLM flights tested positive for coronavirus:

  • Passengers had to get tested prior to travel, suggesting that they only started testing positive within the past 24-36 hours
  • If anyone caught coronavirus on the plane, it’s unlikely that they’d test positive so quickly after contracting it, suggesting that most people testing positive had coronavirus before even getting on the plane
  • We don’t know much about the omicron variant yet, but between vaccination, pre-travel testing, natural immunity, etc., you can’t help but wonder what’s going on that’s causing 10% of passengers to test positive
  • While South Africa is seeing an increase in coronavirus cases, the number of passengers who tested positive for coronavirus is disproportionate to the epidemiological situation in the country (as of now)

I’ve written in the past about how coronavirus testing for travel is a shady business. Not only is it really easy to fake a coronavirus test result, but the providers that do the testing are also often questionable, in terms of analyzing test results, verifying that the person being tested is who they say they are, etc. I can’t help but wonder how many of the pre-travel testing results were legitimate…

Bottom line

Two KLM flights from South Africa yesterday made headlines, as the Netherlands banned flights from South Africa while these planes were enroute. In the end passengers were allowed to disembark in Amsterdam, but then had to be tested. At least 61 of the 600 passengers have tested positive for coronavirus. That’s an incredibly high number, especially when you consider that these passengers also had to be tested before travel.

What do you make of the positivity rate of KLM passengers from South Africa?

Conversations (69)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

DTS Guest

Interesting: most comments on negative tests prior to departure conclude that the tests were forged. Please be advised, and we know that since the early days of the pandemic: you will likely not test positive immediately after becoming infected with SARS-CoV-2 (the virus causing Covid 19), it usually takes at least 48hrs. And you will likely become infectious rather quickly after becoming infected. Meaning, there is a period where you test negative after an infection, but you already pose a risk to others.

0
‼ 0
Jetset Guest

The NYTimes journalist was interviewed by the BBC on a recent Global News podcast episode and confirmed not all passengers were required to present a negative test. Amsterdam apparently doesn’t require a negative test for transit and so PCR results were only required if your final destination needed it. So lots of folks who wouldn’t have been tested.

0
‼ 0
Richard J Tallman Guest

I don’t get it. Why are you the only one talking about this 10% positivity rate of passengers. As soon as I red the news yesterday I thought to myself… how many people fly on 2 wide bodies? That’s around 600 people, I thought to myself… and 61 people testing positive well… that’s about 10%!!! That is truly incredible, and terrifying, to think that 10% of a flight would be positive. And then I started to check all of the news wires waiting for at least 1 member of the press or news organization to mention this alarming statistic, but until now, nobody has. So this morning I did a google search of “10% test positive on KLM flight” and I found your article/post. Until now you are the only one who has mentioned this, which I find to be the real story here… good job to you and let’s wait to see how long it takes before anybody else finds it a good idea to highlight this really scary statistic!

0
‼ 0
Flieger Guest

The testing is a business. And the people that test you couldnt care any less, be it in a "reputable" testing facility... such as a CVS or Walgreens, or in some shady "a guy in a shack doing covid tests for money" business. These are total checkbox exercises and I do not understand why any country would accept tests from places like SA and the likes...

0
‼ 0
AC360 Guest

If someone is only going to change flights in Amsterdam (transient passengers), they probably don’t have to present a negative COVID test result. Right? In other words, some of the passengers who tested positive probably weren’t even required to present a negative COVID test result before boarding the KLM flight.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published