Uh Oh: Hertz’s New AI Technology Detects Vehicle Damage

I’m not sure whether this is good news or bad news. Given that we’re talking about something involving Hertz, it’s probably bad news.

Hertz partners with UVeye to document vehicle condition

One of the potentially frustrating aspects of renting a car involves the process of assessing a vehicle’s condition. Currently, the process of documenting vehicle damage at pick-up and drop-off is highly manual, and there’s no denying that some rental car companies get a bit aggressive with accusing customers of damaging cars. So that’s where Hertz’s new technology comes into play.

Hertz has announced that it’s partnering with UVeye to transform its “vehicle maintenance process.” UVeye is a company with AI-driven vehicle inspection systems.

The idea is that the UVeye system can carefully document the condition of vehicles both upon pick-up and drop-off, and easily determine if there’s any damage without it being a manual process. As you exit and enter the facility, you’ll drive through the UVeye system, which has a bunch of cameras, and you’ll be given a report about the vehicle’s condition.

This is also supposed to be about helping with general vehicle maintenance, though I suspect the primary reason Hertz is investing in this opportunity is because of the additional revenue opportunities. 😉

Here’s how Hertz describes this technology:

With more than half a million vehicles around the globe, keeping vehicles in well maintained condition before, during, and after rentals is a critical priority for Hertz. Vehicle assessments in the rental industry have always relied heavily on manual inspections conducted in varying conditions. By implementing UVeye’s advanced AI-driven inspection technology, Hertz can significantly enhance the frequency, accuracy, and efficiency of its vehicle maintenance processes, ensuring reliable service, improved vehicle availability and transparency for its customers. 

UVeye’s AI-powered camera systems and machine learning algorithms enable real-time, automated inspections of a vehicle’s body, glass, tires, and undercarriage. The technology enables improvements in safety and vehicle availability by detecting maintenance issues with unprecedented speed and precision. UVeye’s tire treadwear system captures high-resolution images that are instantly analyzed to determine whether a tire needs replacement, reducing the need for manual checks and ensuring timely, proactive service. By complementing manual checks with UVeye’s technology, customers will enjoy more efficient and transparent automated checks when picking up and dropping off their vehicles.

Atlanta Airport (ATL) is the first Hertz facility to be equipped with this technology, though the plan is to roll this out at all major US airport locations by the end of the year.

This technology is a double-edged sword

I’m of two minds when it comes to this new technology that Hertz is deploying.

On the one hand, I appreciate that the process is being streamlined, and this system adds a good amount of transparency. Assessing vehicle condition manually is just such an inefficient process, and the burden is really on the person renting the car to prove a lack of damage. For such a big industry, it’s incredible that there hasn’t been more widespread technology like this up until now.

On the other hand, expect that this new system will also detect any little scratch or dent, so don’t expect that you’ll be able to get away with any damage, when that might’ve previously been possible. One wonders just how much of an increase we’ll see in customers being charged for damage. This makes it more important than ever before to pay for your rental car with a credit card offering coverage.

Hertz is deploying new technology for car condition

Bottom line

Hertz is partnering with UVeye to introduce technology that will determine a vehicle’s condition without it being a manual process. Cars will be driven through the UVeye system both upon pick-up and drop-off, and then customers will get a report with any damage.

This is good for transparency, though probably not good in terms of the number of times that customers will be charged for damage.

What do you make of Hertz’s new vehicle damage technology?

Conversations (42)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

William Mitchell Guest

I rented a car through Priceline and got assigned a contract with Thrifty. Picked up the vehicle and asked about taking photos of existing damage. I was told there was no need that the new system at Hartsfield Jackson International Airport in Atlanta does before amd after photos. I was skeptical so I took five minutes to carefully walk around the car looking for and taking photos of any existing damage. The attendant was not interested to sign off anything again noting it was all handled by the automated system. Upon returning the vehicle ten days later and in less time than I could get to my gate, I got an email noting reported damage. I reviewed the before and after images and there was a very small (less than size of a dime) red box on the after image showing what I assume is a reported ding to the trunk top side. The images are very grainy and the reported damage is within a Barry white line, I am guessing from some lights of the automated system. Further, the before image white light lines do not line up with the after image thus if there was a ding (I do not believe there is) it could easily have been in the area between white lines (car is blue) and again, images are grainy and do not clearly show damage. To make this even more upsetting, the $80 damage has added on fees of $129.88 with a countdown timer that apparently started with 40 hours to “save 61%” by accepting the damage report and paying promptly. I did not accept and now the discount is at 41%. I also question the reliability of this system because some of the photos I took myself showing damage do not show when reviewing the report where it shows existing and new damage. I have a 30+ year career in technology and love automation and even like AI for the many benefits it can offer including this new system. That said, I truly believe it made a mistake in my case as I was very gentle with this rental and nothing was placed on the trunk during the time I had the vehicle and I would even walk around it when returning to parking lots to make sure no one dinged it. I even would park it further away from other cars to avoid damages. I hope Thrifty can produce better before and after images of the reported damage as I believe in this case it is a false positive. What is most frustrating is the “scare tactic” to hurry and save by just accepting the report. It’s not like Throfty it os costing Thrifty any more to wait for a customer to request better proof of damages nor saving them money if someone hurries to pay. To me that is a very poorly business practice just to try and pressure customers into paying without asking questions.

0
‼ 0
omarsidd Diamond

Sounds terrible and will be abused. I'm definitely avoiding Hertz locations with this tech. In practice, most rental places don't care (explicitly or effectively) about very minor damage. But this lets them care and charge aggressively. No doubt when the numbers aren't going "up and right" enough, they can re-tune it to be more aggressive or issue higher charges. The absolute wrong outcome from AI-usage, but the one we can expect from American-style late-stage capitalism.

0
‼ 0
BRIAN P Guest

Light Scratches and Dings are normal wear and tear. While you are at it, why don't you charge me for the amount of tire thread that I used? If you charge for light scratches and dings, I won't rent from you. I would be better off Ubering & Lyfting every where.

0
‼ 0
Not a Fan Guest

Scam and will get abused. Minor scratches are expected with usage and nobody cares on their rental car. Will be used to fleece customers for $100-300 per rental. They'll never fix these because again nobody cares. Also will force people to buy their insurance. Will effectively double cost of car rentals. Total money grab. I suspect Ackman going big on Hertz sees this huge revenue stream. Maybe the industry will differentiate here and they'll be a clearly indentifiable company that doesn't fleece the consumer. Worst of all, it'll be a hidden random surcharge after the fact. This is terrible for the consumer.

1
‼ 0
Not a Fan Guest

Scam and will get abused. Minor scratches are expected with usage and nobody cares on their rental car. Will be used to fleece customers for $100-300 per rental. They'll never fix these because again nobody cares. Also will force people to buy their insurance. Will effectively double cost of car rentals. Total money grab. I suspect Ackman going big on Hertz sees this huge revenue stream. Maybe the industry will differentiate here and they'll be a clearly indentifiable company that doesn't fleece the consumer. Worst of all, it'll be a hidden random surcharge after the fact. This is terrible for the consumer. Have fun fighting AI.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published