London Heathrow Airport Third Runway: The Saga Continues

For nearly 20 years, there has been talk of London Heathrow Airport (LHR) getting a third runway. It’s recommended by the government. Then it’s approved. Then it’s blocked by a court. Then it’s approved again. Then it’s blocked again.

Well, there’s now a new development, as there’s a renewed push for Heathrow to get a third runway. Will it actually happen, though? Well…

The debate over a third runway at Heathrow Airport

Heathrow is one of the world’s biggest airports, and it served nearly 84 million passengers in 2024. The catch is that the airport is heavily capacity constrained, as it only has two runways. Currently the airport allows up to 480,000 aircraft movements per year.

In order to operate from the airport, airlines need slots, and those slots are incredibly valuable. Famously, in 2016, Oman Air paid a record $75 million for a pair of slots at the airport, to be able to fly there.

The only practical way Heathrow can significantly expand capacity is with the construction of a third runway. As you’d expect, this is controversial.

The argument in favor of a third runway is pretty simple — it would help fuel economic growth, by allowing more nonstop service between Heathrow and other destinations. Air connectivity fuels economic growth. Period. However, the arguments against it are numerous:

  • It would be costly, and once construction starts, it would take at least a decade to complete
  • Roughly 1,000 homes near the airport would need to be demolished, to make room for the airport
  • Another runway won’t help the UK with its climate targets, since it will lead to increased emissions
  • The London area has six different airports, and some have significant capacity available, so in many ways this is just about continuing to build a mega hub

While it was a quiet several years when it came to the possibility of a third runway at Heathrow, this is now being considered more seriously again. Chancellor Rachel Reeves, the UK’s finance minister, has today backed a third runway at Heathrow.

She has stated that it could create 100,000 jobs, and that “a third runway is badly needed,” and that the government “cannot duck the decision any longer.” As she went on to explain:

“I can confirm today that this government supports a third runway at Heathrow and is inviting proposals to be brought forward by the summer. We will then take forward a full assessment through the airport national policy statement. This will ensure that the project is value for money and our clear expectation is that any associated service transport costs will be financed through private funding. It will ensure that a third runway is delivered in line with our legal, environmental and climate objectives.”

Interestingly, she has criticized previous governments for backing the third runway proposal without actually making progress, so she’s really setting herself up for a bit of a test here, by seeing if she can do better. Of course let me emphasize that any project like this would take at least a decade, so this wouldn’t open before 2035 at the very earliest.

My take on the prospect of a third runway at Heathrow

Should Heathrow have a third runway? I mean, yes, personally I think this seems like a reasonable proposal, and ultimately it’s important for a major market to have a large, competitive airport, with lots of nonstop connectivity.

That being said, do I think this will actually come to fruition? I think it’s unlikely, and that we’re going to see more of the same — proposals, recommendations, approvals, blocking by a court, etc.

Why? Well, a couple of reasons. First of all, infrastructure investments just aren’t very sexy for politicians. People are only in elected office for so long, and if you put a lot of effort into something that takes a decade or more to complete, you don’t really get political brownie points for that, in the same way as something that has more instant gratification.

The other issue is just all the parties that are at odds with one another, and how often public sentiment shifts based on who’s in office. The third runway is opposed by many politicians, environmentalists, those living near the airport, and even many airline executives. For example, since British Airways is the single biggest airline at Heathrow, the airline opposes this expansion, since it would increase competition.

Even if we see a proposal now, and then a tentative approval, you know there’s going to be endless litigation, and a judge somewhere along the way who blocks something. Then if there’s a change in political vibes, the project will be scrapped as fast as it started. At least that’s my take…

Will Heathrow Airport get a third runway?

Bottom line

There’s once again talk of Heathrow Airport getting a third runway, as the current government has expressed strong support for the concept. This is a debate that has been going on for nearly 20 years, so this is hardly novel. In the past we’ve seen this concept proposed and even approved, only to then be blocked by courts.

Only time will tell if things go differently this time. I do think a third runway for Heathrow makes sense, though I also think that actually seeing this all the way through is an uphill battle.

What do you make of the prospects of Heathrow getting a third runway?

Conversations (67)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

JSS Guest

Let's be honest, LHR was built 96 years ago. Any muppet that moves near airports or under flight paths know full well that noise is a consequence of aircraft movements (the same can be said for the NIMBY's who complain about Sydney Airport as well.....and many other airports that have been around a long time) If you move near an airport suck it up and stop complaining, and governments need to start ignoring the idiots who do.

0
‼ 0
grayanderson Diamond

So, when the whole lawsuit was going on a few years ago I honestly don't know why the government didn't just start prepping a report to drop in case they lost (or even just run it before the case). "Fine, here's the report weighing that, we still consider it acceptable, now get lost." I suspect they might have just stripped the requirement if the government had held a functioning majority prior to 2019 (the case resolved in 2020, but at that point there was...a lot on their plate all of a sudden). Remember, the notional grounds weren't "the expansion is illegal" so much as "the government didn't weigh X concern they're required to weigh", and I suspect it would have been an effective slap at some of these campaigns that use grounds that don't /technically/ bar a project from happening to stop it. I suspect this time it'll be a lot harder to make that stick because all it would (probably) take is a whipped motion exempting the airport expansion from the Paris Climate Accord priority to sink any lawsuit, and the government can lose an absurd number of MPs to the opposition lobby (or nearly half their caucus to abstentions) and the vote would still pass.

0
‼ 0
USUKHKflyer Member

Would be sad to lose the 17th century pub in Longford village. A quick walk from the Premier Inn Terminal 5 / Thistle and so much nicer than their own bars, plus you get to commune with airport employees in a historic setting. I agree with those that say there are other ways to achieve growth. Heathrow isn't convenient for anyone not in West London. Expand the other London airports and make it easier to fly overseas from major other UK airports to not constrain London.

0
‼ 0
Barbarella Guest

Let's be honest a hub only works by having both long haul and short haul connectivity + OD demand. This way all markets are funneled in one place. The failure of NRT in Tokyo is a blatant example being too distant from the city center while lacking onward connectivity what it has in capacity vs HND. There is value in the UK managing to be the gateway to Europe while being out of it, leveraging London's attractivity, and be a strategic platform to connect major Indian cities to a granular number of US and Canadian cities (which ME3 struggle to do). But that requires 1 efficient hub with 3 runways (or 4 like CDG) and strategically located terminals. The better package would be to add at least a runway each to LHR and GTW close LCY to scheduled flights, close LTN, STN and SEN altogether and improve national connectivity to the 3 remaining airports (express local trains for up to 2 hour journey and subsidized air service from the rest of the country). Sell that as an overall infrastructure project. This will give an incentive to Virgin to develop as a full carrier increasing competition and business, LCCs will have space to grow in GTW and the lower fares from increased competition can fuel some added airport taxes esp. in LHR international connections to make it worthwhile long term to the British. The Brits are business savvy and the Nimbys don't weigh that much when you tally the votes, the issue is that people that are not at all disturbed by LHR expansion are against it because they feel it's all for London once again. The project is good, the package lacks some lubricant.

0
‼ 0
Fulmar Guest

I wrote my politics degree thesis on a third runway and alternates to Heathrow- in 1973

5
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published