Delta Plans Seattle To Singapore A350 Flights, Carrier’s Third Longest Route

We know that Delta has huge growth aspirations across the Pacific, particularly to Asia. It’s an area where Delta has increasingly fallen behind United in recent years, but Delta now hopes to not only catch up, but even beat United. We’ll see what comes of that, and in particular, find out just how costly that growth is.

While this shouldn’t come as much of a surprise, Delta executives are now publicly confirming plans to return to Singapore, a destination that hasn’t been served by the airline since 2019, when that was an intra-Asia tag flight from Japan. We’re also learning out of which airport that service will likely operate…

Delta is eyeing Singapore for further Asia expansion

As Delta executives view it, the airline is pretty maxed out in terms of its European potential, and in the long run, they see the most long haul growth potential in Asia, the Middle East, and Africa. So, what kind of expansion should we expect?

Delta is planning flights from Seattle to Singapore

Sean Cudahy reports that Delta Chief Commercial Officer Joe Esposito has just explicitly confirmed that the airline is returning to Singapore. That’s not really a surprise, since we’ve known that was in the cards.

But what’s perhaps most interesting is the hub out of which the service will operate — Esposito ruled out that the service could operate out of Los Angeles, so it’s pretty clear that the airline will operate this service out of Seattle (SEA). That also matches previous reporting from JonNYC.

Now, we’ll see with what timeline this service actually launches. My guess is that we’re looking at a fall 2027 service start, at best. At 8,070 miles, this will be Delta’s third longest flight, after its routes to South Africa, which are from Atlanta (ATL) to Cape Town (CPT) and Johannesburg (JNB).

One certainly wonders if this Singapore route could be operated by Delta’s new Airbus A350-1000s, which will feature an all-new passenger experience. While the plane has great range and per seat economics, the only thing I’d say is that it’s “a lot of plane” for a new market, in terms of the overall capacity (even with the very premium layout).

In both the Seattle and Los Angeles to Singapore market, Singapore Airlines is the only other carrier operating. So competitively there’s not a huge difference in that regard, though Singapore Airlines does have significantly more service out of Los Angeles.

Delta is hugely growing its presence in Asia

My take on Delta’s Asia expansion plans

It’s fantastic to see Delta looking to grow its presence in Asia. Point-to-point flying to Asia is a market that United has basically had cornered in recent years, and competition is good for consumers.

It’s amazing to think for how many years Delta basically squandered its Asia advantage. Keep in mind that back in the day, Northwest had a robust Asia network, and after the merger with Delta, we saw that network decreased slowly but steadily, as Delta instead focused on routing everything through Seoul Incheon, and into the Korean Air network. So I’m happy to see a reversal of that strategy.

I also have to say that given Delta’s hubris, it’s kind of fun to see the airline having to increasingly play “catch up,” rather than coming in as the dominant carrier. And I think that very much sums up what’s going on in Asia.

The most basic structural disadvantage that Delta has is that United has a fortress hub in San Francisco (SFO), which is where a large part of its Asia network flies from. That’s fantastic for connectivity, not to mention San Francisco is a very strong market for Asia traffic.

Delta, meanwhile, is taking a split hub approach, flying out of both Los Angeles and Seattle. Obviously Delta is trying to make the best of its situation, but there’s no denying that this is an uphill battle:

  • Both Delta’s Los Angeles and Seattle hubs are roughly half the size of United’s San Francisco hub, so the connectivity and local loyalty just aren’t there in the same way
  • Delta is in second place in Seattle, which isn’t great from a loyalty revenue perspective, given that Alaska continues to be the dominant carrier for the local community
  • Los Angeles is a market that’s really hard to win, and if Delta can actually turn it into a profitable hub where it has a significant market share advantage, it’ll be the first airline to succeed at that in the long run
  • Compared to United, Delta just doesn’t have the breadth or depth of network that United has; for example, one flight a day to Hong Kong is great, but United’s four flights per day are better

It also has to be emphasized that in terms of actually transporting passengers profitably (or at less of a loss), United does a better job at that than Delta, despite its lower overall profitability. Comparing passenger revenue per air seat mile to cost per air seat mile, United is at 16.18 cents vs. 16.46 cents, while Delta is at 17.37 cents vs. 19.31 cents.

Delta is trying to less reliant on Seoul Incheon & Korean Air

Bottom line

Delta is growing quite a bit in Asia at the moment. The airline has already launched flights to Hong Kong, with flights now on sale to Manila and Tokyo Narita. On top of that, Delta has officially confirmed it plans to fly to Singapore in the near future, with the service likely to be out of Seattle rather than Los Angeles.

It’s great for passengers to see more competition across the Pacific, as Delta sure is making up for a lack of effort for years. However, the airline will also have quite the disadvantage compared to United for a long time…

What do you make of Delta’s plans to fly to Singapore?

Conversations (139)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

john Guest

Re comment about SIN completing a return to all major East Asian cities served by NWA: Let's not forget that Delta also served Bangkok, Busan, and Guangzhou (plus little but important Guam). If Delta is serious about being a major player in Asia and a truly global airline, it needs to return to these cities and add more Asian destinations like Kuala Lumpur and Jakarta. Convincing China Southern to repartner and perhaps join Skyteam (big ask) would be wonderful. China Southern is a 4-star airline but it's planes and service are better than Korean Air, in my experience.

0
‼ 0
bacos Member

I'm not so sure on the "most americans would book their flight" bit; I think it cuts both ways. My wife is like this. She prefers DL and all things equal she will choose DL out of familiarity, much as your Asians choose Asian carriers for the same reasons, even if she has to connect. I have only recently been able to get her on Asian carriers, and she sees the quality difference - yet it only matters about so much to her. When I am with her she will take the asian carrier because she lets me navigate any bumps - but when I am not, she'd rather fly DL because she knows what she'll get. Most US people have no idea the joys of J on CX or SG. I did a RTW jaunt last year to NZ on CX/SG/ANA. It blew her away. (first time on ANA/CX for me too, even got The Room and in The Pier, wow. SG Suites, well, I fly SG JFK-FRA a lot so at least I had an inkling.) But again, you have to read these boards to know any better; DL marketing makes their J look great too, you have to get stuck on their 767 and get their indifferent crew to know any better, and if you choose DL first, you'll never have a chance to know.Not to mention the hordes of uninformed people who still seem to think SkyMiles are worth something; they aren't on boards like these to know any better, and even then, the world of miles is just too complicated for them to want to spend attention on it. They go with the flow and that flow for them is on a US carrier.I would agree with your doubt the corporate aspects are drivers, for the reasons you say. It's all the premium leisure travelers. You see all the time in WSJ and others how Americans are traveling more and willing to spend on it and they want a piece of it. Will it be enough to make huge profits? Perhaps not, but it might be enough to pay for itself, and then they get the marketing aspects. And if you want to expand, you have to take these kinds of gambles, or you end up like AA. It's not like they can't afford the risk.

0
‼ 0
Tim Dunn Diamond

The real question that has not been discussed is how soon DL intends to start SIN, presumably from SEA as Ben surmises. Given that DL execs have said that DL will return to SIN, completing a return to all of the major E. Asia cities DL served prior to the NRT hub pulldown except for Beijing, it would seem that DL’s return to SIN will be within 18 months and likely sooner; even a winter 2027 SIN start would support a route announcement within the next couple months. A start in mid-summer 2026 would support an announcement within weeks. The A350-1000s are supposedly on track for delivery in the early spring of 2027 and likely will enter service in early summer. 35K deliveries for 2027 are still heavily loaded in the back half of 2027 but the first 20 of what will certainly be a fleet larger than 20 will be coming pretty quickly so DL’s route growth will accelerate in the latter half of 2027, into 2028 and into 2029 when the next wave of 359s and 339s start coming. Even w/ DL’s stated intent to return to SIN on top of MNL and HKG, DL has not given firm plans for starting LAX-ICN and JFK-ICN, both of which DL is certain to fly on its own metal. DL execs also just said that they want to fly AJS-ICN on their own metal which means that there will be non-hub or focus city routes from ICN to the US flown by both DL and/or KE. DL execs said their TPAC expansion would be aggressive and they are proving that they intend to add new routes quickly.

0
‼ 0
tom Guest

Am I the only one who thinks SQ is vastly overrated? Well trained flight attendants but mediocre food and outdated BC seats. Also, their contract lounge in SEA is forgettable. I think Delta’s newer planes are competitive.

0
‼ 0
John Guest

Imagine being forced to fly Delta instead of SQ on this ultra long haul seated in economy with Dim Sum, TravelinPenis, and 0000 for company...pure Hell.

1
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published