Delta Adds Minneapolis To Copenhagen Flights, Linking Up With SAS

A couple of weeks ago, Delta Air Lines announced its transatlantic expansion for 2025, which included seven new routes to Europe. A couple of days ago, the airline revealed one additional route, which seems like an obvious enough addition. I wanted to provide an update, as this route is now on sale, so we know what the schedule will look like.

Delta adds route to Copenhagen, Denmark

As of May 22, 2025, Delta plans to add flights between Minneapolis (MSP) and Copenhagen, Denmark (CPH). The 4,281-mile flight will operate 3x weekly with the following schedule:

DL116 Minneapolis to Copenhagen departing 6:25PM arriving 10:05AM (+1 day)
DL117 Copenhagen to Minneapolis departing 12:25PM arriving 3:10PM

The eastbound flight is blocked at 8hr40min and will operate on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays, and the westbound flight is blocked at 9hr45min and will operate on Sundays, Wednesdays, and Fridays.

Delta will fly from Minneapolis to Copenhagen

Delta intends to use an Airbus A330-300 for the route, featuring Delta One (business class), Delta Premium Select (premium economy), Delta Comfort+ (extra legroom economy), and Main Cabin (economy).

While it’s not stated one way or another, presumably this is a seasonal service, so we’re probably not talking about that many total frequencies.

This new service out of Minneapolis complements Delta’s existing seasonal flight to the city out of New York (JFK). Delta has a decent transatlantic network out of Minneapolis, though it’s not to the same level as what you’ll find out of Atlanta (ATL), Detroit (DTW), or New York (JFK).

Delta will fly an Airbus A330-300 to Copenhagen

This makes sense, given the SAS codeshare

This route addition from Delta seems logical enough. Scandinavian Airlines (SAS) recently joined the SkyTeam alliance, after it emerged from bankruptcy, and Air France-KLM took a stake in the airline. Beyond that, Delta and SAS have launched a codeshare agreement, offering increased connectivity between the two airlines. Clearly this route is intended to serve those connecting beyond Copenhagen as well, given that it’s SAS’ global hub.

SAS is shifting its US strategy a bit to better align with its newly developed partnerships. We’ve already seen SAS add flights to Atlanta and announce flights to Seattle, so I imagine we’ll increasingly see Delta service to Copenhagen, and SAS service to Delta hubs. I’m sure either Delta or SAS will launch Detroit flights soon as well.

When Delta recently announced its summer expansion for 2025, I was surprised to find that there were no additions to Copenhagen. So it makes sense to see this added now, though I’m curious why it wasn’t added in the first place.

Delta will operate its biggest transatlantic schedule ever in 2025. However, it’s hard to get too excited about the carrier’s 2025 expansion. There’s nothing really off the beaten track, and seven of the eight new routes are just 3-4x weekly. For that matter, all the routes are operated by either 767s or “classic” A330s, which hardly have Delta’s best product.

It certainly pales in comparison to United’s expansion for 2025, which is remarkable for its unique destinations, rather than number of frequencies or aircraft. We’ve never seen such a creative expansion from a US airline.

Delta will operate its biggest schedule to Europe in 2025

Bottom line

As of May 2025, Delta will add a (likely seasonal) 3x weekly flight between Minneapolis and Copenhagen, using an Airbus A330. This is clearly motivated by SAS joining the SkyTeam alliance, and adding a codeshare agreement with Delta. This isn’t that much to get excited about, though it seems like a logical and safe addition.

What do you make of Delta adding Copenhagen flights?

Conversations (57)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

ImportViking Diamond

Wow Timmy, you really have outdunn yourself this time. I've never seen someone being so butthurt due to an airline adding some adventurous new routes to its network. Really, I've seen toddlers acting more mature if things didn't go their way. And the only thing you found to 'defend' how 'premium' Delta is, is the use of wide bodies? You even have to somehow involve the current shitshow at Boeing to show how superior Delta is? That's more far-fetched than the range of an A350-900ULR can cover. I'd almost think you're desperate. Timmy, we don't live in the 1970s anymore. Jumbo jets are out. We now live in an era of boutique airlines and personal attention. Smaller is better, when it comes to aircraft. We now also live in an era where new technology gives new opportunities and United has been grabbing these opportunities with both hands, where DL completely missed the boat. I think that's also what most other readers here appreciate so much about the announced new routes: it shows entrepreneurial spirit, strategy, vision and a willingness to actually try new things, given the possibilities. Are you really saying that United should have bought and utilized a 747 or so to Greenland to show you some dominance on international routes? And how do you assert dominance and superiority when your beloved DL can't even fly daily to Scandinavia's biggest SkyTeam hub, CPH, from one of its own hubs on a widebody? As a business traveler, it would be much more convenient for me if there were daily flights and I'd happily spend that time on a smaller aircraft that cuts out traveling distance and gets the job done, and that gets me back home one or two days earlier than some 3-times-a-week old and worn widebody. Thanks for calling us a 'UA fan club' and Ben a 'troll'. Every insult from you is actually a compliment. Every circus needs a clown and I guess we have you. Please don't visit a psychologist to get treatment for your Delta obsession, we'd miss this kind of contributions. Again, thanks for the laughs, you reaction was hysterical!

1
‼ 0
Justsaying Guest

To me this is odd because I don’t think there is that high amount of demand to Copenhagen. Especially out of places like Atlanta it seems odd

0
‼ 0
ZTravel Diamond

Very underwhelming & boring!

0
‼ 0
Marco Guest

Agree with the below comment that this (just like the new ATL-CPH route by SK) is not an O/D market of any significance. The widebody equipment would be better off on something like SFO-ICN, quite frankly. Or better yet, on domestic trans-cons. And not sure what the point is of flying less-than-daily.

0
‼ 0
ImportViking Diamond

Fun fact. 'Delta' means 'to participate' in some Scandinavian languages. Let them finally live up to that.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published