Boeing Gives Up On New Midsize Airplane (For Now)

This shouldn’t come as much of a surprise, but Boeing doesn’t have plans to introduce any new kinds of jets in the next decade.

Basics of the rumored Boeing New Midsize Airplane (NMA)

Airbus and Boeing are always trying to compete with one another on aircraft types. Not only do we see incremental improvements to existing aircraft models (737 MAX, A321neo, etc.), but every so often we see completely new concepts introduced (A220, 787, etc.).

Boeing has a significant capacity and range gap in its current lineup of passengers jets, as the airline isn’t producing anything between a Boeing 737 and a Boeing 787. Back in 2015, Boeing decided there was enough room in the market to work on a completely new design. This has been referred to as Boeing’s New Midsize Airplane (NMA) concept, or even as the Boeing 797.

The general thought has been that this new concept would fill one of two voids for Boeing:

  • A plane that’s a replacement for the Boeing 767, with two aisles, seven seats per row, and a capacity of 225-275 passengers
  • A plane that can compete with the new Airbus A321XLR, which is the longest range narrow body jet; while the A321neo and Boeing 737 MAX lines are generally competitive, Airbus has the significant advantage when it comes to the range of some variants

Boeing never really publicly promised anything in particular with this concept, but we know that the company was working on this for years. The whole project ended up getting pushed to the side a bit, between the Boeing 737 MAX being grounded globally, the pandemic, issues with the Boeing 777X getting certified, etc.

So, what’s the latest with Boeing’s NMA concept?

Boeing’s NMA could be an updated Boeing 767

Why Boeing is no longer working on a New Midsize Airplane

This week, Boeing CEO David Calhoun formally put to rest any rumors that Boeing might be working on a new aircraft design. Why?

  • There aren’t currently any new propulsion systems that would deliver incremental efficiencies that would make this concept viable
  • If Boeing does introduce a totally new aircraft concept, the company wants it to be a groundbreaking plane, rather than to just have incremental improvements
  • Boeing is focusing on making incremental improvements to existing planes, which have been successful, and make the planes more appealing; for example, we’ve seen range and maximum takeoff weight improvements with Boeing’s newer jets, which improve economics

So, when should we expect Boeing to come up with a totally new aircraft type? Calhoun suggests it might be somewhere around the middle of the next decade, so let’s call it 2035:

“There’ll be a moment in time where we’ll pull the rabbit out of the hat and introduce a new airplane sometime in the middle of the next decade.”

Admittedly I don’t think there are any firm plans there, so only time will tell how this plays out.

Boeing is working on improving existing planes

I can’t blame Boeing for this

I’m not surprised to see Boeing not prioritizing another aircraft type right now:

  • Designing a new aircraft from scratch is incredibly costly, and takes a very long time
  • Keep in mind Boeing started working on the 777X concept in 2013, and that’s just an update to the existing Boeing 777; that’s now expected to enter service in 2025 at the earliest, so that’s a minimum of a 12 year process
  • Boeing is continuing to lose billions of dollars, so it seems like it’s more logical to continue working on incremental improvements to existing jets, rather than starting from scratch
  • At this point Airbus is at a significant long-term advantage compared to Boeing in terms of its product lineup; the company has the A220 (Boeing doesn’t have a competitor), the A321XLR (Boeing doesn’t have a competitor), the A330neo (which somewhat fills the gap between the A321neo and A350), and we’ve seen significant improvements to the A350-1000, which make it pretty competitive to the 777X
  • I can’t help but feel like aircraft technology will have to improve by a lot more than 20% by 2035; we know Airbus is working on some zero emissions concepts, with the hope of having them flying by 2035
Boeing’s 777X project is taking 12+ years to become a reality

Bottom line

Boeing is putting its New Midsize Airplane (NMA) concept on the back-burner. The plan is to now not have a completely new aircraft type until 2035 or so, and instead focus on incremental improvements for the time being. With the pace at which technology evolves and commitments to sustainability change, I can’t help but think that new concepts by 2035 will probably look different than the current NMA plan.

What do you make of Boeing not planning any new aircraft types until the mid-2030s?

Conversations (62)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Dudley New Guest

Boeing could improve the existing 767-200/300/400ER aircraft with new composite wings & tailplane + a choice of new technology engines including the Rolls Royce Ultrafan. Airlines probably want the gap between the Boeing 737 + Airbus A320 series to be filled incrementally rather than a huge jump to the B787 or A350 range.

0
‼ 0
FCC Guest

Boeing just lost the race to Airbus. They’ll lose to Comac (China) within a decade. Boeing is going the way of Hewlett-Packard or even Motorola. From innovation lead companies to cowardly profit-motive lead companies.

0
‼ 0
Dusty Guest

Just another example of the problem with modern "engineering" firms, especially in the US. If it it's not groundbreaking, it's not considered worth doing. Nevermind that incremental improvement on previous designs is exactly how these companies came to dominate the market in the first place. Iterating on known and existing products lets you project development time and costs more accurately, which in turn keeps costs down by preventing cost overruns and project delays (sorry, can't get EMALS to work, sorry, no engine exists that gives us the projected fuel efficiency for this size plane, etc. etc.), allows new tech to be phased in as it becomes ready and then debugged more efficiently. But until then, you design within the limits of available tech. Then you upgrade. The OG 777, 747, A320, etc didn't just spring into being as their current versions.

0
‼ 0
puty Guest

Since McDonald-Douglas, Boeing has ceased to exist. Stonecipher and McNerney looted the company. What is left is the hollowed-out shell of a once-great engineering institution.

0
‼ 0
Seattle757 New Member

"The engine technology is not there"... when was the last time we heard that? It was when people were calling on Boeing to replace the 737 with a clean sheet design. Along comes Airbus and voila! The A320neo family and all of a sudden the engine technology is there. We could have had a clean sheet design but McNerney only cared about one thing - how to use Boeing as his own personal piggy bank for himself and shareholders and redirect money that would have gone to Research and Development to buying back stock. Now we have no competitor to the A321neoXLR and no replacement to the 757 (we keep being told the 737 Max 10 is the replacement but we all know this is malarkey). Now what is the excuse for not designing and building a new clean sheet NMA 2.0? "The engine technology is not there". Now Boeing may not be buying back stock, but where do you think that money that isn't being invested is going to? Trust me, it has being irritating working at an "Airplane Bank"

2
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published